TR 22.867
Study on 5G Smart Energy and Infrastructure
V18.2.0 (Wzip)
2021/12 102 p.
- Rapporteur:
- Mr. XIA, XU
China Telecomunication Corp.
essential Table of Contents for TR 22.867 Word version: 18.2.0
each title links to the equivalent title in the CONTENT
List of Figures and Tables
| Figure 5.1.1-1 | Example of Distributed Energy Storage grid architecture |
| Table 5.1.6-1 | periodic communication service performance requirements - data for distributed energy storage |
| Table 5.1.6-2 | Aperiodic communication service performance requirements - video for distributed energy storage |
| Figure 5.2.1-1 | AMI example architecture |
| Figure 5.2.3-1 | smart meter works as home gateway |
| Table 5.2.6-1 | Communication KPI for advanced metering (note 1) |
| Figure 5.3.1-1 | Example of distributed feeder automation architecture |
| Table 5.3.1-1 | the typical power load estimated in the CBD |
| Table 5.3.6-1 | KPI for Distributed Feeder Automation (note 1) |
| Figure 5.4.1-1 | Line Current Differential Protection by two protection relays (Relay_a and Relay_b), deployed in two substations |
| Figure 5.5.3-1 | Multiple End-to-End QoS Flows from Substation to DSO Service Network |
| Table 5.5.5-1 | KPIs for Smart Energy Services |
| Table 5.5.6-1 | KPIs for Smart Energy Services |
| Figure 5.7.1-1 | Remote DSO management of connectivity for Smart Energy |
| Figure 5.7.2-1 | A DSO-MNO Management Model |
| Figure 5.8.1-1 | Example of Smart Distribution Transformer Terminal work flow |
| Table 5.8.6-1 | Key Performance for Smart Distribution Transformer Terminal |
| Table 5.9.1-1 | typical safety zone and related energy application |
| Figure 5.9.1-1 | isolation demand for energy applications |
| Figure 5.10.1-1 | Different Security Domains |
| Figure 5.10.3-1 | Different Security Domains |
| Figure 5.12.1-1 | the big picture of Smart Energy |
| Figure 5.12.2.1-1 | Distributed Feeder Automation |
| Table 5.12.2.5-1 | performance requirements applicable to this use case |
| Table 5.12.2.6-1 | service performance requirements for Feeder automation |
| Table 5.12.2.6-2 | service performance requirements for Feeder automation continued |
| Table 5.12.3.6-1 | performance requirement for High speed current differential protection |
| Table 5.12.3.6-2 | |
| Figure 5.13.1-1 | Synchrophasor data collection network [X6] |
| Table 5.13.1-1 | PMU reporting rate and the corresponding Reporting Period in IEEE Std C37.118™-2011 [25] |
| Table 5.13.1-2 | PMU measurement reporting latency |
| Table 5.13.1-3 | max End-to-end communication latency (ms) at different PMU reporting rate |
| Table 5.14.5-1 | Transport of Surveillance HDTV KPI Requirements |
| Figure 5.15.1-1 | IEC 61850 communication stack |
| Table 5.15.1-1 | Time constraints for IEC 61850 messages [33] |
| Table 5.15.1-2 | general security requirements for different communication services [34] |
| Table 5.15.6-1 | |
| Table 5.15.6-2 | |
| Figure 5.16.1-1 | New ecosystem and the positioning of interfaces |
| Figure 5.16.1-2 | Microgrid controlled by its own EMS (Source: DNV GL). A microgrid is a group of interconnected loads and distributed energy resources with defined electrical boundaries that acts as a single controllable entity and is able to operate in both grid-connected and islanded mode [44] |
| Table 5.16.1-1 | Tripping time under certain abnormal conditions (s). The interconnection protection requirements vary among standards |
| Figure 5.17.1-1 | TCP-UDP/IP profile based utility M2M system illustrating a client reporting to two different head-end servers in the DSO's data centre [50] |
| Figure 5.17.1-2 | DSO EDL's management platform of MSM service. EDL has two subscriptions to two mobile operators |
| Figure 5.17.1-3 | Illustration of a typical utility M2M management mechanism [50], implemented ubiquitously in currently available commercial M2M systems for utility operators |
| Table 5.19.1-1 | Allowed inaccuracy defined by IEC 61850-9-3 [7] |
| Table 5.19.6.2-1 | Clock synchronization service performance requirements |
| Table 5.20.5-1 | Communications requirements of SE service |
| Table 5.21.6-1 | |
| Figure 5.22.1-1 | (a) Conventional grid restoration (hierarchical top-down blackout recovery) and (b) autarkic microgrid restoration (each islanded microgrid autonomously recovers from blackout) Figure taken from [58] |
| Table 5.22.6-1 | |
| Figure 5.23.3-1 | Service flow diagram for edgePMU use case |
| Table 5.23.5-1 | |
| Table 5.24.5-1 | Communications requirements of Load and Generation Prediction service |
| Table 7.1-1 | Consolidated Potential Requirements |
| Table 7.2-1 | KPI Table of Periodic Communication Services |
| Table 7.2-2 | KPI Table of Aperiodic Communication Services |
| Table 7.2-3 | Clock Synchronization Service Performance Requirements |
| Figure A.1-1 | Underground Access Approaches |
| Figure A.2-1 | Example Underground 3GPP Access Deployment using PLC |