Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
21222324252627282931323334353637384‑5x

Content for  TR 38.835  Word version:  18.0.1

Top   Top   Up   Prev   Next
1…   4…   5…   6   A   B…   B.1.2   B.1.3   B.1.4   B.1.5   B.1.6   B.1.7   B.1.8   B.1.9   B.1.10   B.2…   B.2.2   B.2.3   B.2.4   B.2.5   B.2.6   B.2.7   B.2.8   B.2.9   B.2.10   B.2.11   B.2.12   B.2.13   B.2.14   B.2.15   B.2.16   B.2.17   B.2.18   C…

 

B.2.2  Dynamic CDRX alignmentp. 60

This clause captures evaluation results for enhanced CDRX based on dynamic alignment between CDRX and XR traffic. The following evaluations were provided by companies:
  • Nokia evaluated dynamic adaptation of DRX parameters based on auxiliary L1/L2 signalling in addition to semi-static solution to align XR traffic and CDRX operation.
  • ZTE and Qualcomm evaluated dynamic CDRX enhancement to adjust the CDRX start offset.
sourcedata row indexTdoc sourcePower saving schemeCDRX cycle (ms)ODT (ms)IAT (ms)Load H/L#UE /cellfloor (Capa­city)% of DL satis­fied UE% of UL satis­fied UE% of DL + UL satis­fied UECapa­city gain (%)Mean PSG of all UEs (%)Mean PSG of satis­fied UEs (%)Addi­tional Assump­tions
ZTE8R1-2211905Always on---H111193.18%100%-93.18%0.00%0%-
ZTE11R1-2211905Dynamic indication5064H111190.1%100%90.1%-3.31%23%-
ZTE12R1-2211905Non-uniform CDRX cycle17-17-1664H111190.15%100%90.15%-3.25%23.86%-
ZTE13R1-2211905Uniform non-integer CDRX cycle(1000/60)64H111190.15%100%90.15%-3.25%23.85%-
ZTE14R1-2211905Multiple CDRX (3 CDRX configurations)50ms DRX cycle64H111190.11%100%90.11%-3.29%24%-
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.2-1, the following observations can be made:
  • For FR1, DL + UL joint evaluation, InH, high load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps and 10ms PDB, it is observed from ZTE that:
    • dynamic alignment provides:
      • power saving gain of 23% for all UEs
      • capacity gain of -3.31%
    • semi-static alignment as the performance reference provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 23.90% in the range of 23.85% to 24% for all UEs
      • mean capacity gain of -3.26% in the range of -3.29% to -3.25%.
sourcedata row indexTdoc sourcePower saving schemeCDRX cycle (ms)ODT (ms)IAT (ms)Load H/L#UE /cellfloor (Capa­city)% of satis­fied UECapa­city gain (%)Mean PSG of all UEs (%)Mean PSG of satis­fied UEs (%)Addi­tional Assump­tions
NokiaR1-2211551Always On Baseline---H6690%0.0%0.0%-
Nokia1R1-2211551CDRX1688H6660%-33.3%13.30%-
Nokia2R1-2211551Cyclic DRX pattern{16,17,17}88H6640%-55.6%16.00%-
Nokia3R1-2211551Adaptive DRX1688H6662%-31.1%15.00%-Note1
Nokia4R1-2211551Adaptive DRX{16, 17, 17}88H6662%-31.1%15.00%-Note1
Nokia5R1-2211551Adaptive DRX1688H6675%-16.7%19.00%-Note2
NOTE 1:
startOffset = ExpectedArrival - FixedTimeShift
NOTE 1:
scalingFactor X={1/2,1/4}
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.2-2, the following observations can be made:
  • For FR1, DL only evaluation, InH, high load, CG 30Mbps traffic at 60fps and 15ms PDB, it is observed from Nokia that:
    • adaptive DRX provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 16.33% in the range of 15.00% to 19.00% for all UEs
      • mean capacity gain of -26.3% in the range of -31.1% to -16.7%
    • semi-static CDRX periodicity alignment provides:
      • power saving of 16.00%
      • capacity gain of -55.6%
    • R15/16 CDRX provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 13.30% for all UEs
      • capacity gain of -33.3%
sourcedata row indexTdoc sourcePower saving schemeCDRX cycle (ms)ODT (ms)IAT (ms)Load H/L#UE /cellfloor (Capa­city)% of satis­fied UECapa­city gain (%)Mean PSG of all UEs (%)Mean PSG of satis­fied UEs (%)Addi­tional Assump­tions
NokiaR1-2211551Always On Baseline---H5595%0.0%0.0%-
Nokia7R1-2211551CDRX1688H550%-100.0%--
Nokia8R1-2211551Cyclic DRX pattern{16,17,17}88H550%-100.0%--
Nokia9R1-2211551Adaptive DRX1688H5525%-73.7%15.00%-Note1
Nokia10R1-2211551Adaptive DRX{16, 17, 17}88H5525%-73.7%15.00%-Note1
Nokia11R1-2211551Adaptive DRX1688H5570%-26.3%19.00%-Note2
ZTE1R1-2211905Always on---H111193.18%0.00%0%-
ZTE4R1-2211905Dynamic indication5064H111190.1%-3.31%33%-
ZTE5R1-2211905Non-uniform CDRX cycle17-17-1664H111190.15%-3.25%33.9%-
ZTE6R1-2211905Uniform non-integer CDRX cycle(1000/60)64H111190.18%-3.22%33.8%-
ZTE7R1-2211905Multiple CDRX (3 CDRX configu­rations)50ms DRX cycle64H111190.1%-3.31%34%-
NOTE 1:
startOffset = ExpectedArrival - FixedTimeShift
NOTE 2:
scalingFactor X={1/2,1/4}
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.2-3, the following observations can be made:
  • For FR1, DL only evaluation, InH, high load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps and 10ms PDB, it is observed from Nokia that:
    • adaptive DRX provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 16.33% in the range of 15.00% to 19.00% for all UEs
      • mean capacity gain of -57.90% in the range of -73.7% to -26.3%
    • semi-static CDRX periodicity alignment and R15/16 CDRX provides:
      • capacity gain of -100%
  • For FR1, DL only evaluation, InH, high load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps and 10ms PDB, it is observed from ZTE that:
    • dynamic alignment provides power:
      • saving gain of 33% for all UEs
      • capacity gain of -3.31%.
    • semi-static alignment as the performance reference provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 33.90% in the range of 33.80% to 34% for all UEs
      • mean capacity gain of -3.26% in the range of-3.22% to -3.31%.
sourcedata row indexTdoc sourcePower saving schemeCDRX cycle (ms)ODT (ms)IAT (ms)Load H/L#UE /cellfloor (Capa­city)% of satis­fied UECapa­city gain (%)Mean PSG of all UEs (%)Addi­tional Assump­tions
QC39R1-2212134Always On---H7790%0.0%0%
QC40R1-2212134eCDRX + PDCCH skipping1644H7727%-70.0%31.5%Note 1
QC41R1-2212134eCDRX + PDCCH skipping1688H7784%-6.7%17.4%Note 1
QC42R1-2212134eCDRX + PDCCH skipping16816H7788%-2.2%12.7%Note 1
QC43R1-2212134Enhan­cement:
eCDRX + PDCCH skipping + Adaptive ON Start
1644H7727%-70.0%60.5%Note 1
QC44R1-2212134Enhan­cement:
eCDRX + PDCCH skipping + Adaptive ON Start
1688H7784%-6.7%48.9%Note 1
QC45R1-2212134Enhan­cement:
eCDRX + PDCCH skipping + Adaptive ON Start
16816H7788%-2.2%42.7%Note 1
QC46R1-2212134eCDRX + PDCCH skipping1644H7727%-70.0%45.5%Note 2
QC47R1-2212134eCDRX + PDCCH skipping1688H7784%-6.7%43.1%Note 2
QC48R1-2212134eCDRX + PDCCH skipping16816H7788%-2.2%43.7%Note 2
QC49R1-2212134Enhan­cement:
>eCDRX + PDCCH skipping + Adaptive ON Start
1644H7727%-70.0%74.5%Note 2
QC50R1-2212134Enhan­cement:
eCDRX + PDCCH skipping + Adaptive ON Start
1688H7784%-6.7%74.6%Note 2
QC51R1-2212134Enhan­cement:
eCDRX + PDCCH skipping + Adaptive ON Start
16816H7788%-2.2%73.7%Note 2
NOTE 1:
PDCCH skipping inside ON duration only
NOTE 2:
PDCCH skipping inside ON duration and for IAT (early IAT termination)
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.2-4, the following observations can be made:
  • For FR2, DL only evaluation, InH, high load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps and 10ms PDB, it is observed from Qualcomm that:
    • adaptative On Start (on top of semi-static alignment and PDCCH skipping) provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 62.48% in the range of 42.70% and 74.60% for all UEs
      • mean capacity gain of -26.30% in the range of -70.0% to -2.2%
    • semi-static alignment and PDCCH skipping as the performance reference provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 32.32% in the range of 12.70% to 45.50% for all UEs
      • mean capacity gain of -26.30% in the range of -70.0% to -2.2%
sourcedata row indexTdoc sourcePower saving schemeCDRX cycle (ms)ODT (ms)IAT (ms)Load H/L#UE /cellfloor (Capa­city)% of satis­fied UECapa­city gain (%)Mean PSG of all UEs (%)Mean PSG of satis­fied UEs (%)Addi­tional Assump­tions
NokiaR1-2206225Always On Baseline---H8896%0.0%-
Nokia1R1-2206225CDRX1688H8650%-48%13.30%-
Nokia2R1-2206225Adaptive DRX16[1,16]0H8669%-28%12.00%-Note 1
Nokia3R1-2206225Adaptive DRX16[8,16]0H8776%-20%9.00%-Note 2
Nokia4R1-2206225Adaptive DRX16[4,12]0H835%-94%22.00%-Note 3
NOTE 1:
Onduration can be adapted in the range indicated in ODT column.
NOTE 2:
Onduration can be adapted in the range indicated in ODT column. Range for startOffset adaptation was [0,2]ms
NOTE 3:
Onduration can be adapted in the range indicated in ODT column. Range for startOffset adaptation was [0,4]ms
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.2-5, the following observations can be made:
  • For FR1, DL only evaluation, DU, high load, CG 30Mbps traffic at 60fps and 15ms PDB, it is observed from Nokia that:
    • adaptive DRX provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 13.33% in the range of 9.00% to 22.00% for all UEs
      • mean capacity gain of -47.33xx% in the range of -20% to X-94%%
    • R15/16 CDRX provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 13.30% for all UEs
      • capacity gain of -48%
sourcedata row indexTdoc sourcePower saving schemeCDRX cycle (ms)ODT (ms)IAT (ms)Load H/L#UE /cellfloor (Capa­city)% of satis­fied UECapa­city gain (%)Mean PSG of all UEs (%)Mean PSG of satis­fied UEs (%)Addi­tional Assump­tions
NokiaR1-2206225Always On Baseline---H6696%0.0%-
Nokia1R1-2206225CDRX1688H600%-100%0.0%-
Nokia2R1-2206225Adaptive DRX16[1,16]0H6425%-73%9.3%-Note 1
Nokia3R1-2206225Adaptive DRX16[8,16]0H6571%-26%13%-Note 2
Nokia4R1-2206225Adaptive DRX16[4,12]0H625%-69%18.2%-Note 3
NOTE 1:
Onduration can be adapted in the range indicated in ODT column.
NOTE 2:
Onduration can be adapted in the range indicated in ODT column. Range for startOffset adaptation was [0,2]ms
NOTE 3:
Onduration can be adapted in the range indicated in ODT column. Range for startOffset adaptation was [0,3]ms
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.2-6, the following observations can be made:
  • For FR1, DL only evaluation, DU, high load, AR/VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps and 10ms PDB, it is observed from Nokia that:
    • adaptive DRX provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 13.5% in the range of 9.3% to 18.2% for all UEs
      • mean capacity gain of -56% in the range of -26% to -73%
    • R15/16 CDRX provides:
      • mean power saving gain of 0% for all UEs
      • capacity gain of -100%
Up

Up   Top   ToC