Content for TR 45.914 Word version: 16.0.0
8 Adaptive symbol constellation
8.1 Concept Description
8.2 Performance Characterization
8.3 Impacts on the Mobile Station
8.4 Impacts on the BSS
8.5 Impacts on Network Planning
8.6 Impacts on the Specification
8.7 Summary of Evaluation versus Objectives
8.8 References
...
...
8 Adaptive symbol constellation Word‑p. 137
8.1 Concept Description
8.1.1 Symbol Constellation for the Downlink
8.1.2 -QPSK Modulator Word‑p. 138
8.1.3 Choice of Symbol Constellation Word‑p. 139
8.1.4 Adaptive Constellation Rotation Word‑p. 140
8.1.5 Frequency hopping Word‑p. 142
8.1.5.1 Legacy support Word‑p. 145
8.1.5.2 Additional signaling
8.1.6 SAM - Single Antenna MIMO - for VAMOS
8.2 Performance Characterization
8.2.1 Link Level Performance
8.2.1.1 Simulation assumptions Word‑p. 148
8.2.1.2 Sensitivity Performance Word‑p. 149
8.2.1.2.1 SAIC receiver
8.2.1.2.1.1 Support of legacy mobiles Word‑p. 151
8.2.1.2.2 MUROS receiver Word‑p. 152
8.2.1.2.3 SIC receiver Word‑p. 154
8.2.1.3 Interference Performance Word‑p. 159
8.2.1.3.1 non-SAIC receiver
8.2.1.3.2 SAIC receiver Word‑p. 161
8.2.1.3.2.1 Adaptive Constellation Rotation Word‑p. 169
8.2.1.3.3 MUROS receiver Word‑p. 171
8.2.1.3.4 SIC receiver Word‑p. 172
8.2.1.3.4.1 Investigations by Telefon AB LM Ericsson
8.2.1.3.4.2 Investigations by ST-NXP Wireless France Word‑p. 176
8.2.1.3.5 SAM Receiver for VAMOS
8.2.1.4 Results from: MUROS - Performance of Alpha-QPSK with Legacy DARP MS Word‑p. 191
8.2.1.4.1 Simulation Assumptions
8.2.1.4.1.1 Legacy Terminals
8.2.1.4.1.2 Transmitted MUROS Signal Word‑p. 192
8.2.1.4.1.3 Alpha-QPSK
8.2.1.4.1.4 MUROS Interference Models Word‑p. 193
8.2.1.4.1.5 Other Simulation Parameters
8.2.1.4.2 Downlink Performance Results
8.2.1.4.2.1 Sensitivity Performance
8.2.1.4.2.2 MTS-1 Performance Word‑p. 194
8.2.1.4.2.3 MTS-2 Performance Word‑p. 195
8.2.1.4.2.4 MTS-3 Performance Word‑p. 196
8.2.1.4.2.5 MTS-4 Performance Word‑p. 197
8.2.1.4.3 Summary of Results Word‑p. 198
8.2.2 Network Level Performance
8.2.2.1 Adaptive constellation rotation
8.2.2.2 Support of legacy non-DARP Phase I receivers using ∝-QPSK Word‑p. 199
8.2.2.2a Downlink power control using ∝-QPSK Word‑p. 200
8.2.2.3 Evaluation of VAMOS MAIO hopping Word‑p. 202
8.2.2.3a MAIO Hopping Scheme Methodology Word‑p. 203
8.2.2.3a.1 MAIO Hopping Sequence Generation
8.2.2.3a.2 Channel Allocation and Adaptation
8.2.2.3a.3 Power Control Word‑p. 204
8.2.2.3a.4 Mechanism for Applying MAIO Hopping
8.2.2.3a.5 Penetration Levels and MS Types
8.2.2.3a.6 Link 2 System Interface
8.2.2.3a.7 System Performance Evaluation
8.2.2.4 Evaluation of wide pulse for VAMOS Word‑p. 206
8.2.2.4.1 Background
8.2.2.4.2 Methodology Word‑p. 207
8.2.2.4.2.1 Power control Word‑p. 208
8.2.2.4.2.2 Channel allocation
8.2.2.4.2.3 Modelling of link performance
8.2.2.4.3 Results
8.2.2.4.3.1 Simulation assumptions
8.2.2.4.3.2 System capacity gains
8.2.2.4.3.3 Impact on legacy users
8.2.2.4.3.4 Discussion Word‑p. 213
8.2.3 Verification of Link to System Mapping
8.2.3.1 Methodology, DL
8.2.3.1.1 Interference scenarios
8.2.3.1.2 Raw BER verification levels Word‑p. 214
8.2.3.1.3 Interference statistics Word‑p. 215
8.2.3.1.4 Adjacent channel interference
8.2.3.1.5 Mappings
8.2.3.2 Verification, DL Word‑p. 217
8.2.4 Verfication of 4-dimension Link to System Mapping Word‑p. 223
8.2.5 Methodology and verification of integrated link simulator modeling Word‑p. 227
8.2.6 Results
8.3 Impacts on the Mobile Station Word‑p. 230
8.4 Impacts on the BSS
8.5 Impacts on Network Planning Word‑p. 231
8.6 Impacts on the Specification
8.7 Summary of Evaluation versus Objectives
8.8 References Word‑p. 234
