Tech-
invite
3GPP
space
IETF
space
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
4‑5x
Content for
TR 45.914
Word version: 16.0.0
0…
4…
7…
8…
9…
11…
7
Orthogonal Sub Channels for Circuit Switched Voice Capacity Evolution
7.1
Concept description
7.2
Performance Characterization
7.3
Impacts on the Mobile Station
7.4
Impacts on the BSS
7.5
Impacts on Network Planning
7.6
Impacts on the Specifications
7.7
Summary of Evaluation versus Objectives
7.8
References
...
7
Orthogonal Sub Channels for Circuit Switched Voice Capacity Evolution
7.1
Concept description
7.1.1
Overview
7.1.2
Downlink concept
7.1.2.1
Basic OSC concept
7.1.2.1.1
Mapping of user bits using QPSK modulation
7.1.2.1.2
Burst structure, training sequence, tail and guard bits
Word‑p. 66
7.1.2.1.3
Tx pulse shaping filter
Word‑p. 67
7.1.2.1.3.1
Investigated Candidate TX Pulse Shapes
7.1.2.1.3.1.1
Candidate Pulse Shape 1
7.1.2.1.3.1.2
Candidate Pulse Shape 2
Word‑p. 69
7.1.2.1.3.2
Comparison of Filter Characteristics
Word‑p. 70
7.1.2.1.4
Symbol rotation
Word‑p. 71
7.1.2.1.5
DTX handling when one sub channel is inactive
7.1.2.1.6
FACCH signalling
7.1.2.1.7
SACCH signalling
7.1.2.2
Enhanced OSC concept
Word‑p. 72
7.1.2.2.1
Sub channel specific power control
7.1.2.2.2
Power Balancing
Word‑p. 73
7.1.2.2.3
Soft Stealing for FACCH with sub channel specific power control
7.1.2.2.4
Soft Stealing for SACCH with sub channel specific power control
7.1.2.2.5
User Diversity
Word‑p. 74
7.1.2.2.5.1
Basic User Diversity
7.1.2.2.5.2
Optimized User Diversity
Word‑p. 75
7.1.2.2.5.3
Support of Optimized User Diversity for scenarios with mixed MS types
Word‑p. 76
7.1.2.2.5.4
Benefits of Optimized User Diversity
Word‑p. 82
7.1.3
Uplink concept
Word‑p. 83
7.1.3.1
Modulation and burst structure
7.1.3.2
Usage of new training sequences
7.1.3.3
Tx pulse shape
7.1.3.4
Associated control channels
7.1.3.5
User diversity
7.1.3.6
BTS receiver
7.1.4
RR signalling
7.2
Performance Characterization
Word‑p. 84
7.2.1
Link Level Performance
7.2.1.1
Sensitivity Performance
7.2.1.1.1
Sensitivity in downlink
7.2.1.1.1.1
Sensitivity in downlink without sub channel specific power control
7.2.1.1.1.2
Sensitivity in downlink with subchannel specific power control
Word‑p. 87
7.2.1.1.2
Sensitivity in uplink
Word‑p. 88
7.2.1.2
Interference Performance
Word‑p. 89
7.2.1.2.1
Interference limited performance in downlink
7.2.1.2.1.1
Interference performance in downlink without subchannel specific power control
7.2.1.2.1.1.1
Performance for MUROS Test Scenario 1
7.2.1.2.1.1.2
Performance for MUROS Test Scenario 2
7.2.1.2.1.1.3
Performance for Using Optimized TX Pulse Shapes
Word‑p. 91
7.2.1.2.1.2
Interference performance in downlink with subchannel specific power control
Word‑p. 92
7.2.1.3
Results from: MUROS - Performance of Legacy MS
Word‑p. 94
7.2.1.3.1
Simulation Assumptions
7.2.1.3.1.1
Legacy Terminals
7.2.1.3.1.2
Transmitted MUROS Signal
Word‑p. 95
7.2.1.3.1.3
MUROS Interference Models
7.2.1.3.1.4
Other Simulation Parameter
7.2.1.3.2
Downlink Performance Results
7.2.1.3.2.1
Sensitivity Performance
7.2.1.3.2.2
MTS-1 Performance
Word‑p. 96
7.2.1.3.2.3
MTS-2 Performance
Word‑p. 97
7.2.1.3.2.4
MTS-3 Performance
Word‑p. 98
7.2.1.3.2.5
MTS-4 Performance
Word‑p. 99
7.2.1.3.2.6
ACI Performance
Word‑p. 100
7.2.1.3.3
Summary of results
Word‑p. 101
7.2.2
Network Level Performance
7.2.2.1
Network Configurations
7.2.2.2
Performance results
Word‑p. 102
7.2.2.2.1
MUROS-1
Word‑p. 103
7.2.2.2.2
MUROS-2
7.2.2.2.3
MUROS-3
7.2.2.2.4
OSC capacity gains and HW efficiency
Word‑p. 104
7.2.2.2.5
Performance of optimized user diversity
Word‑p. 105
7.2.2.2.6
Performance applying Sub Channel Specific Power Control for OSC
Word‑p. 106
7.2.2.2.7
Performance for Usage of Optimized TX Pulse Shape in Downlink
Word‑p. 107
7.2.2.2.7.1
Setup for System Performance Evaluation
7.2.2.2.7.1.1
Network configurations
7.2.2.2.7.1.2
Channel mode adaptation
7.2.2.2.7.1.3
Link to system interface
7.2.2.2.7.2
System Performance Results
7.2.2.2.7.2.1
MUROS-1
7.2.2.2.7.2.2
MUROS-2
Word‑p. 109
7.2.2.2.7.3
Performance Comparison
Word‑p. 111
7.2.2.2.7.3.1
Introduction
7.2.2.2.7.3.2
Comparison
7.2.2.2.7.3.3
Interference analysis
Word‑p. 112
7.2.3
Performance Summary
Word‑p. 113
7.2.4
Modelling methodology for a VAMOS and legacy mobile receiver
7.2.4.1
Introduction
7.2.4.2
L2S Modelling Methodology
7.2.4.3
Initial Interference Profile
Word‑p. 114
7.2.4.4
'ACP' factors
Word‑p. 115
7.2.4.4.1
Introduction
7.2.4.4.2
RawBER 'ACP' factors for VAMOS I receiver
7.2.4.4.3
RawBER 'ACP' factors for Legacy Non-DARP receiver
Word‑p. 116
7.2.4.5
Final Interference Profile
Word‑p. 117
7.2.5
Verification of Link to System Mapping
Word‑p. 119
7.2.5.1
Introduction
7.2.5.2
Link To System Interface For Vamos-I Receiver
7.2.5.3
Mappings For The Vamos-I Receiver
Word‑p. 120
7.2.5.3.1
MUROS-1
7.2.5.3.1.1
50 % VAMOS-I mobile penetration
7.2.5.3.1.2
75 % VAMOS-I mobile penetration
Word‑p. 121
7.2.5.3.1.3
100 % VAMOS-I mobile penetration
Word‑p. 122
7.2.5.3.2
MUROS-2
Word‑p. 124
7.2.5.3.2.1
50 % VAMOS-I mobile penetration
7.2.5.3.2.2
75 % VAMOS-I mobile penetration
Word‑p. 125
7.2.5.3.2.3
100 % VAMOS-I mobile penetration
Word‑p. 126
7.2.5.4
Mappings For The Legacy Non-Darp Receiver
Word‑p. 128
7.3
Impacts on the Mobile Station
Word‑p. 129
7.4
Impacts on the BSS
7.4.1
BTS Transmitter
7.4.2
BTS Receiver
7.4.3
Radio Resource Management (RRM)
Word‑p. 130
7.4.3.1
Power Control
7.4.3.2
Dynamic Channel Allocation (DCA)
7.4.3.3
AMR Channel Rate and Codec Mode Adaptation
7.5
Impacts on Network Planning
7.5.1
Impacts to Abis interface
7.5.1.1
Impact of OSC on Abis allocation strategy
7.5.1.2
Impact of OSC on bandwidth consumption
Word‑p. 131
7.5.1.3
Abis migration paths
7.5.2
Impacts on Frequency Planning
Word‑p. 132
7.6
Impacts on the Specifications
7.7
Summary of Evaluation versus Objectives
7.7.1
Performance objectives
Word‑p. 133
7.7.2
Compatibility objectives
Word‑p. 134
7.8
References
Word‑p. 135