Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETF RFCsSIP
Quick21222324252627282931323334353637384‑5x
Top   in Index   Prev   Next

TR 23.816
Identification of communication services in IMS

3GPP‑Page   ToC  
V7.0.0 (Wzip)  2006/03  15 p.
Rapporteur:
Mr. Bertenyi, Balazs
Nokia Networks

full Table of Contents for  TR 23.816  Word version:  7.0.0

Here   Top

0  IntroductionWord‑p. 4

During the definition of IMS, 3GPP has adopted the approach of defining a number of IMS enablers to be used by a number of services. The adoption of the IMS by other standardisation bodies such as OMA, TISPAN and ATIS is a testament to the success of this approach. With a system that supports a number of services on a common set of enablers leads to the need of identifying the communication service that is being invoked.
This technical report captures the results of a feasibility study into the identification of IMS communication services with a focus on the application of an IMS communication service identifier and the necessary administrative procedures.
A brief summary of the needs to identify a IMS communication service include:
  • the IMS network is required to identify the correct application server(s) to link into the SIP call path over the ISC, when an application server is required;
  • the media authorization policy may use a communication service identifier as input;
  • it is desirable for the network to be able to authorize the use of a communication service;
  • charging may use a communication service identifier as input;
  • in a multi-UE scenario where a recipient has several UEs with different UE capabilities, it is useful to be able to route the SIP request to the UE(s) supporting a requested communication service;
  • in order to enable the User Equipment to identify the correct application logic, while allowing for many services to be offered using the same enablers and media types;
  • often interworking requires knowledge of the services being interworked, as such interworking between an IMS based service and a non-IMS based service may benefit from the identification of the requested communication service;
  • allowing the network to authorise the use of the service for a particular user;
  • communication service prioritisation in the case of network overload;
  • to be an input into inter-operator interconnect service level agreements;
  • provide a scope for the IOP specifications related to a particular communication service.
Up

1  ScopeWord‑p. 5

The scope of the technical report is to capture the results of a feasibility study in the needs of identifying IMS communication services with and in the need of the IMS communication service identifier.
This technical report contains the results into a study on the communication service identifier with a focus on the following aspects:
  • a frame work description for the usage and applicability of the communication service identifier and its relationship with the PSI and other existing IMS mechanisms;
  • identifying the architectural requirements for a communication service identifier that enable the usage scenarios identified in the above justification section;
  • identifying requirements on compatibility and evolution of a communication service in relation to the communication service identifier;
  • identify the methods for administrative procedures for a communication service identifier, including the requirements upon when a service identifier value is required to be allocated;
In addition alternative mechanisms to identify communication services may be identified.
Up

2  ReferencesWord‑p. 5

3  Definitions, symbols and abbreviationsWord‑p. 5

3.1  DefinitionsWord‑p. 5

3.2  SymbolsWord‑p. 6

3.3  AbbreviationsWord‑p. 6

4  Need of identifying IMS communication servicesWord‑p. 6

5  The IMS communication service IdentifierWord‑p. 10

6  Administrative procedures for the IMS communication service identifierWord‑p. 13

7  Alternative means to identify IMS communication servicesWord‑p. 14

8  ConclusionWord‑p. 14

$  Change historyWord‑p. 15


Up   Top