Tech-invite  3GPPspecsRELsGlossariesSIPRFCs
8887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100

in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 8606

ISDN User Part (ISUP) Cause Location Parameter for the SIP Reason Header Field

Pages: 7
Proposed Standard
Updates:  3326

Top   ToC   RFC8606 - Page 1
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         R. Jesske
Request for Comments: 8606                              Deutsche Telekom
Updates: 3326                                                  June 2019
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721


             ISDN User Part (ISUP) Cause Location Parameter
                    for the SIP Reason Header Field

Abstract

The SIP Reason header field is defined to carry ISUP (ISDN User Part) cause values as well as SIP response codes. Some services in SIP networks may need to know the ISUP location where the call was released in the PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) to correctly interpret the reason of release. This document updates RFC 3326 by adding a location parameter for this purpose. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8606. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Top   ToC   RFC8606 - Page 2

Table of Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Rationale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 8.1. Registration of the Location Parameter for the Reason Header Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1. Introduction

Section 3.4 of [RFC3326] describes a SIP message flow for canceling an INVITE request when a REL (release) message is received from the ISUP side. That document specifies the SIP Reason header field [RFC3326] that is used to indicate the reason of release. The reason of release indicates why a SIP Dialog or a PSTN call, in cases where the call was interworked to the PSTN, was terminated. The termination may be normal, based on a failure within an entity (e.g. temporary failure) or caused by other factors (e.g., congestion). The reason may be a SIP response or an ISUP release cause as specified within [Q.850]. [RFC6432] specifies that an ISUP [Q.850] cause code can be carried within a SIP response, but not the Q.850 location information. The [Q.850] location information identifies the part of the ISUP network where the call was released. This document adds a location value parameter to the reason-extension parameter defined in [RFC3326] so that the [Q.850] location value can be interworked from the PSTN. The interworking from the PSTN needs only to include the location received by the interworking gateway. [Q.850] describes the definitions of the cause code values and the locations used in ISDN and DSS1 (Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1) environments. The cause code is used for identifying the reason of release of a call, and the location identifies where the call was released.
Top   ToC   RFC8606 - Page 3

2. Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Rationale

The primary intent of the parameter defined in this specification is for use in IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem) networks defined by 3GPP, but it is also open to be used by any other networks that include ISUP interworking gateways and use Q.850 reason codes. The purpose of this parameter is to hold the location of the call release so that it can be transported from the originating PSTN entity to the SIP entity via a response or BYE message. The ISDN location is defined in [Q.850].

4. Mechanism

As defined by [RFC6432], any SIP Response message, with the exception of 100 (Trying), MAY contain a Reason header field with a Q.850 [Q.850] cause code. This specification adds a parameter with the ISUP location value defined in [Q.850] to the Reason header field that identifies the location of the call release in ISUP. The location is a 4-bit value that reflects the possible locations where an ISUP call is released. Some values are spare or reserved for national use. The Augmented BNF (ABNF) [RFC5234] for this parameter is shown in Figure 1.
Top   ToC   RFC8606 - Page 4
     reason-extension    =/ isup-cause-location
     isup-cause-location =  "location" EQUAL isup-location-value

     isup-location-value =
        "U" /      ; for 0 0 0 0 user
        "LPN" /    ; for 0 0 0 1 private network serving the local user
        "LN" /     ; for 0 0 1 0 public network serving the local user
        "TN" /     ; for 0 0 1 1 transit network
        "RLN" /    ; for 0 1 0 0 public network serving the remote user
        "RPN" /    ; for 0 1 0 1 private network serving the remote user
        "LOC-6" /  ; for 0 1 1 0 spare
        "INTL" /   ; for 0 1 1 1 international network
        "LOC-8" /  ; for 1 0 0 0 spare
        "LOC-9" /  ; for 1 0 0 1 spare
        "BI" /     ; for 1 0 1 0 network beyond interworking point
        "LOC-11" / ; for 1 0 1 1 spare
        "LOC-12" / ; for 1 1 0 0 reserved for national use
        "LOC-13" / ; for 1 1 0 1 reserved for national use
        "LOC-14" / ; for 1 1 1 0 reserved for national use
        "LOC-15"   ; for 1 1 1 1 reserved for national use

                  Figure 1: ABNF for isup-cause-location

   Note: These are the location values defined within [Q.850].  The
   'LOC-*' names are the wire codepoints for the values currently left
   as 'spare' or 'reserved' in [Q.850]; these will continue to be the
   wire codepoints in the case of future allocation or national usage of
   the such values.

   The UAC or UAS SHALL include the location parameter in a request or
   response when setting up the Reason header field with a [Q.850] cause
   when the ISUP [Q.850] location is available.

   The use of the location parameter is restricted to Q.850 cause
   values.  Other values MUST be ignored if present.

5. Example

The following example shows a SIP 404 response message containing a Reason header field with a [Q.850] cause value and an isup-cause- location value. The 404 Response will be sent when a gateway receives an ISUP release with a [Q.850] cause set to 1, meaning Unallocated (unassigned) number, i.e., the number is not known in the PSTN.
Top   ToC   RFC8606 - Page 5
         SIP/2.0 404 Not Found
         Via: SIP/2.0/TCP proxy.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKx5st
         Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.0.2.3:5060;branch=z9hG4bK4321
         From: Alice <sips:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=1234567
         To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=765432
         Call-ID: 12345600@atlanta.example.com
         CSeq: 1 INVITE
         Reason: Q.850;cause=1;text="Unallocated (unassigned) number";
              location=LN
         Content-Length: 0

        Figure 2: Example of a Location in the Reason Header Field

6. Privacy Considerations

While the addition of the location parameter provides an indicator of the entity that added the location in the signaling path, it provides little more exposure than the [Q.850] cause itself. The ISUP location value itself will not reveal the identity of the originating or terminating party of the call. It shows only the ISUP network location of the device that released the call. The ISUP location does not show the physical location of the caller or callee.

7. Security Considerations

This document doesn't change any of the security considerations described in [RFC3326]. The addition of the location parameter provides an indicator of the [Q.850] location where the call was released within the PSTN. This information may be used for specific location-driven services but does not create any additional security constraints. Because the [Q.850] location is very imprecise, the [Q.850] location value itself will not add any major security constraints. The use of this parameter is not restricted to a specific architecture. [RFC3398] describes detailed security considerations due to interworking between ISUP and SIP. Beyond these considerations, the addition of the location does not introduce new security concerns. The location shows the network part where the call was released. Knowing this does not increase the possibilities of extended fraud scenarios.
Top   ToC   RFC8606 - Page 6

8. IANA Considerations

8.1. Registration of the Location Parameter for the Reason Header Field

IANA has registered a new SIP header parameter in the "Header Field Parameters and Parameter Values" subregistry of the "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Parameters" registry <https://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters>, per the guidelines in [RFC3968]: Header Field: Reason Parameter Name: location Predefined Values: Yes Reference: RFC 8606

9. Normative References

[Q.850] ITU-T, "Usage of cause and location in the Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1 and the Signalling System No. 7 ISDN user part", Recommendation ITU-T Q.850, October 2018, <https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Q.850>. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC3326] Schulzrinne, H., Oran, D., and G. Camarillo, "The Reason Header Field for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 3326, DOI 10.17487/RFC3326, December 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3326>. [RFC3398] Camarillo, G., Roach, A., Peterson, J., and L. Ong, "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Mapping", RFC 3398, DOI 10.17487/RFC3398, December 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3398>. [RFC3968] Camarillo, G., "The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) Header Field Parameter Registry for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", BCP 98, RFC 3968, DOI 10.17487/RFC3968, December 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3968>.
Top   ToC   RFC8606 - Page 7
   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.

   [RFC6432]  Jesske, R. and L. Liess, "Carrying Q.850 Codes in Reason
              Header Fields in SIP (Session Initiation Protocol)
              Responses", RFC 6432, DOI 10.17487/RFC6432, November 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6432>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Michael Kreipl, Thomas Belling, Marianne Mohali, Peter Daws, Paul Kyzivat, Dale Worley, Yehoshua Gev, and Keith Drage for the comments and review.

Author's Address

Roland Jesske Deutsche Telekom Heinrich-Hertz Str, 3-7 Darmstadt 64295 Germany Email: r.jesske@telekom.de URI: www.telekom.de