Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETF RFCsSIP
9190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 3398

Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Mapping

Pages: 68
Proposed Standard
Errata
Part 1 of 3 – Pages 1 to 30
None   None   Next

Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 1
Network Working Group                                       G. Camarillo
Request for Comments: 3398                                      Ericsson
Category: Standards Track                                    A. B. Roach
                                                             dynamicsoft
                                                             J. Peterson
                                                                 NeuStar
                                                                  L. Ong
                                                                   Ciena
                                                           December 2002


      Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP)
              to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Mapping

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This document describes a way to perform the mapping between two signaling protocols: the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) of Signaling System No. 7 (SS7). This mechanism might be implemented when using SIP in an environment where part of the call involves interworking with the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN).

Table of Contents

1. Introduction............................................ 3 2. Scope................................................... 4 3. Terminology............................................. 5 4. Scenarios............................................... 5 5. SIP Mechanisms Required................................. 7 5.1 'Transparent' Transit of ISUP Messages.................. 7 5.2 Understanding MIME Multipart Bodies..................... 7 5.3 Transmission of DTMF Information........................ 8 5.4 Reliable Transmission of Provisional Responses.......... 8 5.5 Early Media............................................. 8 5.6 Mid-Call Transactions which do not change SIP state..... 9
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 2
   5.7     Privacy Protection......................................  9
   5.8     CANCEL causes........................................... 10
   6.      Mapping................................................. 10
   7.      SIP to ISUP Mapping..................................... 11
   7.1     SIP to ISUP Call flows.................................. 11
   7.1.1   En-bloc Call Setup (no auto-answer)..................... 11
   7.1.2   Auto-answer call setup.................................. 12
   7.1.3   ISUP T7 Expires......................................... 13
   7.1.4   SIP Timeout............................................. 14
   7.1.5   ISUP Setup Failure...................................... 15
   7.1.6   Cause Present in ACM Message............................ 16
   7.1.7   Call Canceled by SIP.................................... 17
   7.2     State Machine........................................... 18
   7.2.1   INVITE received......................................... 19
   7.2.1.1 INVITE to IAM procedures................................ 19
   7.2.2   ISUP T7 expires......................................... 23
   7.2.3   CANCEL or BYE received.................................. 23
   7.2.4   REL received............................................ 24
   7.2.4.1 ISDN Cause Code to Status Code Mapping.................. 24
   7.2.5   Early ACM received...................................... 27
   7.2.6   ACM received............................................ 27
   7.2.7   CON or ANM Received..................................... 28
   7.2.8   Timer T9 Expires........................................ 29
   7.2.9   CPG Received............................................ 29
   7.3     ACK received............................................ 30
   8.      ISUP to SIP Mapping..................................... 30
   8.1     ISUP to SIP Call Flows.................................. 30
   8.1.1   En-bloc call setup (non auto-answer).................... 31
   8.1.2   Auto-answer call setup.................................. 32
   8.1.3   SIP Timeout............................................. 33
   8.1.4   ISUP T9 Expires......................................... 34
   8.1.5   SIP Error Response...................................... 35
   8.1.6   SIP Redirection......................................... 36
   8.1.7   Call Canceled by ISUP................................... 37
   8.2     State Machine........................................... 39
   8.2.1   Initial Address Message received........................ 39
   8.2.1.1 IAM to INVITE procedures................................ 40
   8.2.2   100 received............................................ 41
   8.2.3   18x received............................................ 41
   8.2.4   2xx received............................................ 43
   8.2.5   3xx Received............................................ 44
   8.2.6   4xx-6xx Received........................................ 44
   8.2.6.1 SIP Status Code to ISDN Cause Code Mapping.............. 45
   8.2.7   REL Received............................................ 47
   8.2.8   ISUP T11 Expires........................................ 47
   9.      Suspend/Resume and Hold................................. 48
   9.1     Suspend (SUS) and Resume (RES) Messages................. 48
   9.2     Hold (re-INVITE)........................................ 50
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 3
   10.     Normal Release of the Connection........................ 50
   10.1    SIP initiated release................................... 50
   10.2    ISUP initiated release.................................. 51
   10.2.1  Caller hangs up......................................... 51
   10.2.2  Callee hangs up (SUS)................................... 52
   11.     ISUP Maintenance Messages............................... 52
   11.1    Reset messages.......................................... 52
   11.2    Blocking messages....................................... 53
   11.3    Continuity Checks....................................... 53
   12.     Construction of Telephony URIs.......................... 54
   12.1    ISUP format to tel URL mapping.......................... 56
   12.2    tel URL to ISUP format mapping.......................... 57
   13.     Other ISUP flavors...................................... 58
   13.1    Guidelines for sending other ISUP messages.............. 58
   14.     Acronyms................................................ 60
   15.     Security Considerations................................. 60
   16.     IANA Considerations..................................... 64
   17.     Acknowledgments......................................... 64
   18.     Normative References.................................... 64
   19.     Non-Normative References................................ 65
           Authors' Addresses...................................... 67
           Full Copyright Statement................................ 68

1. Introduction

SIP [1] is an application layer protocol for establishing, terminating and modifying multimedia sessions. It is typically carried over IP. Telephone calls are considered a type of multimedia sessions where just audio is exchanged. Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) [12] is a level 4 protocol used in Signaling System No. 7 (SS7) networks. It typically runs over Message Transfer Part (MTP) although it can also run over IP (see SCTP [19]). ISUP is used for controlling telephone calls and for maintenance of the network (blocking circuits, resetting circuits etc.). A module performing the mapping between these two protocols is usually referred to as Media Gateway Controller (MGC), although the terms 'softswitch' or 'call agent' are also sometimes used. An MGC has logical interfaces facing both networks, the network carrying ISUP and the network carrying SIP. The MGC also has some capabilities for controlling the voice path; there is typically a Media Gateway (MG) with E1/T1 trunking interfaces (voice from Public Switched Telephone Network - PSTN) and with IP interfaces (Voice over IP - VoIP). The MGC and the MG can be merged together in one physical box or kept separate.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 4
   These MGCs are frequently used to bridge SIP and ISUP networks so
   that calls originating in the PSTN can reach IP telephone endpoints
   and vice versa.  This is useful for cases in which PSTN calls need to
   take advantage of services in IP world, in which IP networks are used
   as transit networks for PSTN-PSTN calls, architectures in which calls
   originate on desktop 'softphones' but terminate at PSTN terminals,
   and many other similar next-generation telephone architectures.

   This document describes logic and procedures which an MGC might use
   to implement the mapping between SIP and ISUP by illustrating the
   correspondences, at the message level and parameter level, between
   the protocols.  It also describes the interplay between parallel
   state machines for these two protocols as a recommendation for
   implementers to synchronize protocol events in interworking
   architectures.

2. Scope

This document focuses on the translation of ISUP messages into SIP messages, and the mapping of ISUP parameters into SIP headers. For ISUP calls that traverse a SIP network, the purpose of translation is to allow SIP elements such as proxy servers (which do not typically understand ISUP) to make routing decisions based on ISUP criteria such as the called party number. This document consequently provides a SIP mapping only for those ISUP parameters which might be used by intermediaries in the routing of SIP requests. As a side effect of this approach, translation also increases the overall interoperability by providing critical information about the call to SIP endpoints that cannot understand encapsulated ISUP, or perhaps which merely cannot understand the particular ISUP variant encapsulated in a message. This document also only takes into account the call functionality of ISUP. Maintenance messages dealing with PSTN trunks are treated only as far as they affect the control of an ongoing call; otherwise these messages neither have nor require any analog in SIP. Messages indicating error or congestion situations in the PSTN (MTP- 3) and the recovery mechanisms used such as User Part Available and User Part Test ISUP messages are outside the scope of this document There are several flavors of ISUP. International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) International ISUP [12] is used through this document; some differences with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) [11] ISUP and the Telecommunication Technology Committee (TTC) ISUP are also outlined. ITU-T ISUP is used in this document because it is the most widely known of all the ISUP flavors. Due to the small number of fields
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 5
   that map directly from ISUP to SIP, the signaling differences between
   ITU-T ISUP and specific national variants of ISUP will generally have
   little to no impact on the mapping.  Note, however, that the ITU-T
   has not substantially standardized practices for Local Number
   Portability (LNP) since portability tends to be grounded in national
   numbering plan practices, and that consequently LNP must be described
   on a virtually per-nation basis.  The number portability practices
   described in this document are presented as an optional mechanism.

   Mapping of SIP headers to ISUP parameters in this document focuses
   largely on the mapping between the parameters found in the ISUP
   Initial Address Message (IAM) and the headers associated with the SIP
   INVITE message; both of these messages are used in their respective
   protocols to request the establishment of a call.  Once an INVITE has
   been sent for a particular session, such headers as the To and From
   field become essentially fixed, and no further translation will be
   required during subsequent signaling, which is routed in accordance
   with Via and Route headers.  Hence, the problem of parameter-to-
   header mapping in SIP-T is confined more or less to the IAM and the
   INVITE.  Some additional detail is given in the population of
   parameters in the ISUP messages Address Complete Message (ACM) and
   Release Message (REL) based on SIP status codes.

   This document describes when the media path associated with a SIP
   call is to be initialized, terminated, modified, etc., but it does
   not go into details such as how the initialization is performed or
   which protocols are used for that purpose.

3. Terminology

In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [2] and indicate requirement levels for compliant SIP implementations.

4. Scenarios

There are several scenarios where ISUP-SIP mapping takes place. The way the messages are generated is different depending on the scenario.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 6
   When there is a single MGC and the call is from a SIP phone to a PSTN
   phone, or vice versa, the MGC generates the ISUP messages based on
   the methods described in this document.

   +-------------+       +-----+       +-------------+
   | PSTN switch +-------+ MGC +-------+ SIP UAC/UAS |
   +-------------+       +-----+       +-------------+

   The scenario where a call originates in the PSTN, goes into a SIP
   network and terminates in the PSTN again is known as "SIP bridging".
   SIP bridging should provide ISUP transparency between the PSTN
   switches handling the call.  This is achieved by encapsulating the
   incoming ISUP messages in the body of the SIP messages (see [3]).  In
   this case, the ISUP messages generated by the egress MGC are the ones
   present in the SIP body (possibly with some modifications; for
   example, if the called number in the request Uniform Resource
   Identifier - URI - is different from the one present in the ISUP due
   to SIP redirection, the ISUP message will need to be adjusted).

   +------+   +-------------+   +-----+   +------------+   +------+
   | PSTN +---+ Ingress MGC +---+ SIP +---+ Egress MGC +---+ PSTN |
   +------+   +-------------+   +-----+   +------------+   +------+

   SIP is used in the middle of both MGCs because the voice path has to
   be established through the IP network between both MGs; this
   structure also allows the call to take advantage of certain SIP
   services.  ISUP messages in the SIP bodies provide further
   information (such as cause values and optional parameters) to the
   peer MGC.

   In both scenarios, the ingress MGC places the incoming ISUP messages
   in the SIP body by default.  Note that this has security
   implications; see Section 15.  If the recipient of these messages
   (typically a SIP User Agent Client/User Agent Server - UAC/UAS) does
   not understand them, a negotiation using the SIP 'Accept' and
   'Require' headers will take place and they will not be included in
   the next SIP message exchange.

   There can be a Signaling Gateway (SG) between the PSTN and the MGC.
   It encapsulates the ISUP messages over IP in a manner such as the one
   described in [19].  The mapping described in this document is not
   affected by the underlying transport protocol of ISUP.

   Note that overlap dialing mechanisms (use of the Subsequent Address
   Message - SAM) are outside the scope of this document.  This document
   assumes that gateways facing ISUP networks in which overlap dialing
   is used will implement timers to insure that all digits have been
   collected before an INVITE is transmitted to a SIP network.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 7
   In some instances, gateways may receive incomplete ISUP messages
   which indicate message segmentation due to excessive message length.
   Commonly these messages will be followed by a Segmentation Message
   (SGM) containing the remainder of the original ISUP message.  An
   incomplete message may not contain sufficient parameters to allow for
   a proper mapping to SIP; similarly, encapsulating (see below) an
   incomplete ISUP message may be confusing to terminating gateways.
   Consequently, a gateway MUST wait until a complete ISUP message is
   received (which may involve waiting until one or more SGMs arrive)
   before sending any corresponding INVITE.

5. SIP Mechanisms Required

For a correct mapping between ISUP and SIP, some SIP mechanisms above and beyond those available in the base SIP specification are needed. These mechanisms are discussed below. If the SIP UAC/UAS involved in the call does not support them, it is still possible to proceed, but the behavior in the establishment of the call may be slightly different than that expected by the user (e.g., other party answers before receiving the ringback tone, user is not informed about the call being forwarded, etc.).

5.1 'Transparent' Transit of ISUP Messages

To allow gateways to take advantage of the full range of services afforded by the existing telephone network when placing calls from PSTN to PSTN across a SIP network, SIP messages MUST be capable of transporting ISUP payloads from gateway to gateway. The format for encapsulating these ISUP messages is defined in [3]. SIP user agents which do not understand ISUP are permitted to ignore these optional MIME bodies.

5.2 Understanding MIME Multipart Bodies

In most PSTN interworking situations, SIP message bodies will be required to carry session information (Session Description Protocol - SDP) in addition to ISUP and/or billing information. PSTN interworking nodes MUST understand the MIME type of "multipart/mixed" as defined in RFC2046 [4]. Clients express support for this by including "multipart/mixed" in an "Accept" header.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 8

5.3 Transmission of Dual-Tone Multifrequency (DTMF) Information

How DTMF tones played by the user are transmitted by a gateway is completely orthogonal to how SIP and ISUP are interworked; however, as DTMF carriage is a component of a complete gatewaying solution some guidance is offered here. Since the codec selected for voice transmission may not be ideally suited for carrying DTMF information, a symbolic method of transmitting this information in-band is desirable (since out-of-band transmission alone would provide many challenges for synchronization of the media stream for tone re-insertion). This transmission MAY be performed as described in RFC2833 [5].

5.4 Reliable Transmission of Provisional Responses

Provisional responses (in the 1xx class) are used in the transmission of call progress information. PSTN interworking in particular relies on these messages for control of the media channel and timing of call events. When interworking with the PSTN, SIP messages MUST be sent reliably end-to-end; reliability of requests is guaranteed by the base protocol. One application-layer provisional reliability mechanism for responses is described in [18].

5.5 Early Media

Early media denotes the capability to play media (audio for telephony) before a SIP session has been established (before a 2xx response code has been sent). For telephony, establishment of media in the backwards direction is desirable so that tones and announcements can be played, especially when interworking with a network that cannot signal call status out of band (such as a legacy MF network). In cases where interworking has not been encountered, use of early media is almost always undesirable since it consumes inter-machine trunk recourses to play media for which no revenue is collected. Note that since an INVITE almost always contains the SDP required to send media in the backwards direction, and requires that user agents prepare themselves to receive backwards media as soon as an INVITE transmitted, the baseline SIP protocol has enough support to enable rudimentary unidirectional early media systems. However, this mechanism has a number of limitations - for example, media streams offered in the SDP of the INVITE cannot be modified or declined, and bidirectional RTCP required for session maintenance cannot be established.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 9
   Therefore gateways MAY support more sophisticated early media systems
   as they come to be better understood.  One mechanism that provides a
   way of initiating a fully-featured early media system is described in
   [20].

   Note that in SIP networks not just switches but also user agents can
   generate the 18x response codes and initiate early backwards media,
   and that therefore some gateways may wish to enforce policies that
   restrict the use of backwards media from arbitrary user agents (see
   Section 15).

5.6 Mid-Call Transactions which do not change SIP state

When interworking with the PSTN, there are situations when gateways will need to send messages to each other over SIP that do not correspond to any SIP operations. In support of mid-call transactions and other ISUP events that do not correspond to existing SIP methods, SIP gateways MUST support the INFO method, defined in RFC2976 [6]. Note that this document does not prescribe or endorse the use of INFO to carry DTMF digits. Gateways MUST accept "405 Method Not Allowed" and "501 Not Implemented" as non-fatal responses to INFO requests - that is, any call in progress MUST NOT be torn down if a destination so rejects an INFO request sent by a gateway.

5.7 Privacy Protection

ISUP has a concept of presentation restriction - a mechanism by which a user can specify that they would not like their telephone number to be displayed to the person they are calling (presumably someone with Caller ID). When a gateway receives an ISUP request that requires presentation restriction, it must therefore shield the identity of the caller in some fashion. The base SIP protocol supports a method of specifying that a user is anonymous. However, this system has a number of limitations - for example, it reveals the identity of the gateway itself, which could be a privacy-impacting disclosure. Therefore gateways MAY support more sophisticated privacy systems. One mechanism that provides a way of supporting fully-featured privacy negotiation (which interacts well with identity management systems) is described in [9B].
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 10

5.8 CANCEL causes

There is a way in ISUP to signal that you would like to discontinue an attempt to set up a call - the general-purpose REL is sent in the forwards direction. There is a similar concept in SIP - that of a CANCEL request that is sent in order to discontinue the establishment of a SIP dialog. For various reasons, however, CANCEL requests cannot contain message bodies, and therefore in order to carry the important information in the REL (the cause code) end-to-end in sip bridging cases, ISUP encapsulation cannot be used. Ordinarily, this is not a big problem, because for practical purposes the only reason that a REL is ever issued to cancel a call setup attempt is that a user hangs up the phone while it is still ringing (which results in a "Normal clearing" cause code). However, under exceptional conditions, like catastrophic network failure, a REL may be sent with a different cause code, and it would be handy if a SIP network could carry the cause code end-to-end. Therefore gateways MAY support a mechanism for end-to-end delivery of such failure reasons. One mechanism that provides this capability is described in [9].

6. Mapping

The mapping between ISUP and SIP is described using call flow diagrams and state machines. One state machine handles calls from SIP to ISUP and the second from ISUP to SIP. There are details, such as some retransmissions and some states (waiting for the Release Complete Message - RLC, waiting for SIP ACK etc.), that are not shown in the figures in order to make them easier to follow. The boxes represent the different states of the gateway, and the arrows show changes in the state. The event that triggers the change in the state and the actions to take appear on the arrow: event / section describing the actions to take. For example, 'INVITE / 7.2.1' indicates that an INVITE request has been received by the gateway, and the procedure upon reception is described in the section 7.2.1 of this document. It is RECOMMENDED that gateways implement functional equivalence with the call flows detailed in Section 7.1 and Section 8.1. Deviations from these flows are permissible in support of national ISUP variants, or any of the conservative policies recommended in Section 15.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 11

7. SIP to ISUP Mapping

7.1 SIP to ISUP Call flows

The following call flows illustrate the order of messages in typical success and error cases when setting up a call initiated from the SIP network. "100 Trying" acknowledgements to INVITE requests are not displayed below although they are required in many architectures. In these diagrams, all call signaling (SIP, ISUP) is going to and from the MGC; media handling (e.g., audio cut-through, trunk freeing) is being performed by the MG, under the control of the MGC. For the purpose of simplicity, these are shown as a single node, labeled "MGC/MG."

7.1.1 En-bloc Call Setup (no auto-answer)

SIP MGC/MG PSTN 1|---------INVITE---------->| | |<----------100------------| | | |------------IAM---------->|2 | |<=========Audio===========| | |<-----------ACM-----------|3 4|<----------18x------------| | |<=========Audio===========| | | |<-----------CPG-----------|5 6|<----------18x------------| | | |<-----------ANM-----------|7 | |<=========Audio==========>| 8|<----------200------------| | |<=========Audio==========>| | 9|-----------ACK----------->| | 1. When a SIP user wishes to begin a session with a PSTN user, the SIP node issues an INVITE request. 2. Upon receipt of an INVITE request, the gateway maps it to an IAM message and sends it to the ISUP network. 3. The remote ISUP node indicates that the address is sufficient to set up a call by sending back an ACM message. 4. The "called party status" code in the ACM message is mapped to a SIP provisional response (as described in Section 7.2.5 and Section 7.2.6) and returned to the SIP node. This response may contain SDP to establish an early media stream (as shown in the diagram). If no SDP is present, the audio will be established in both directions after step 8.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 12
   5.  If the ISUP variant permits, the remote ISUP node may issue a
       variety of Call Progress (CPG) messages to indicate, for example,
       that the call is being forwarded.

   6.  Upon receipt of a CPG message, the gateway will map the event
       code to a SIP provisional response (see Section 7.2.9) and send
       it to the SIP node.

   7.  Once the PSTN user answers, an Answer (ANM) message will be sent
       to the gateway.

   8.  Upon receipt of the ANM, the gateway will send a 200 message to
       the SIP node.

   9.  The SIP node, upon receiving an INVITE final response (200), will
       send an ACK to acknowledge receipt.

7.1.2 Auto-answer call setup

SIP MGC/MG PSTN 1|---------INVITE---------->| | |<----------100------------| | | |------------IAM---------->|2 | |<=========Audio===========| | |<-----------CON-----------|3 | |<=========Audio==========>| 4|<----------200------------| | |<=========Audio==========>| | 5|-----------ACK----------->| | Note that this flow is not supported in ANSI networks. 1. When a SIP user wishes to begin a session with a PSTN user, the SIP node issues an INVITE request. 2. Upon receipt of an INVITE request, the gateway maps it to an IAM message and sends it to the ISUP network. 3. Since the remote node is configured for automatic answering, it will send a Connect Message (CON) upon receipt of the IAM. (For ANSI, this message will be an ANM). 4. Upon receipt of the CON, the gateway will send a 200 message to the SIP node. 5. The SIP node, upon receiving an INVITE final response (200), will send an ACK to acknowledge receipt.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 13

7.1.3 ISUP T7 Expires

SIP MGC/MG PSTN 1|---------INVITE---------->| | |<----------100------------| | | |------------IAM---------->|2 | |<=========Audio===========| | | *** T7 Expires *** | | ** MG Releases PSTN Trunk ** | 4|<----------504------------|------------REL---------->|3 5|-----------ACK----------->| | 1. When a SIP user wishes to begin a session with a PSTN user, the SIP node issues an INVITE request. 2. Upon receipt of an INVITE request, the gateway maps it to an IAM message and sends it to the ISUP network. The ISUP timer T7 is started at this point. 3. The ISUP timer T7 expires before receipt of an ACM or CON message, so a REL message is sent to cancel the call. 4. A gateway timeout message is sent back to the SIP node. 5. The SIP node, upon receiving an INVITE final response (504), will send an ACK to acknowledge receipt.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 14

7.1.4 SIP Timeout

SIP MGC/MG PSTN 1|---------INVITE---------->| | |<----------100------------| | | |------------IAM---------->|2 | |<=========Audio===========| | |<-----------CON-----------|3 | |<=========Audio==========>| 4|<----------200------------| | | *** T1 Expires *** | | |<----------200------------| | | *** T1 Expires *** | | |<----------200------------| | | *** T1 Expires *** | | |<----------200------------| | | *** T1 Expires *** | | |<----------200------------| | | *** T1 Expires *** | | |<----------200------------| | | *** T1 Expires *** | | 5|<----------200------------| | | *** T1 Expires *** | | | ** MG Releases PSTN Trunk ** | 7|<----------BYE------------|------------REL---------->|6 | |<-----------RLC-----------|8 1. When a SIP user wishes to begin a session with a PSTN user, the SIP node issues an INVITE request. 2. Upon receipt of an INVITE request, the gateway maps it to an IAM message and sends it to the ISUP network. 3. Since the remote node is configured for automatic answering, it will send a CON message upon receipt of the IAM. In ANSI flows, rather than a CON, an ANM (without ACM) would be sent. 4. Upon receipt of the ANM, the gateway will send a 200 message to the SIP node and set SIP timer T1. 5. The response is retransmitted every time the SIP timer T1 expires. 6. After seven retransmissions, the call is torn down by sending a REL to the ISUP node, with a cause code of 102 (recover on timer expiry).
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 15
   7.  A BYE is transmitted to the SIP node in an attempt to close the
       call.  Further handling for this clean up is not shown, since the
       SIP node's state is not easily known in this scenario.

   8.  Upon receipt of the REL message, the remote ISUP node will reply
       with an RLC message.

7.1.5 ISUP Setup Failure

SIP MGC/MG PSTN 1|---------INVITE---------->| | |<----------100------------| | | |------------IAM---------->|2 | |<-----------REL-----------|3 | |------------RLC---------->|4 5|<----------4xx+-----------| | 6|-----------ACK----------->| | 1. When a SIP user wishes to begin a session with a PSTN user, the SIP node issues an INVITE request. 2. Upon receipt of an INVITE request, the gateway maps it to an IAM message and sends it to the ISUP network. 3. Since the remote ISUP node is unable to complete the call, it will send a REL. 4. The gateway releases the circuit and confirms that it is available for reuse by sending an RLC. 5. The gateway translates the cause code in the REL to a SIP error response (see Section 7.2.4) and sends it to the SIP node. 6. The SIP node sends an ACK to acknowledge receipt of the INVITE final response.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 16

7.1.6 Cause Present in ACM Message

SIP MGC/MG PSTN 1|---------INVITE---------->| | |<----------100------------| | | |------------IAM---------->|2 | |<=========Audio===========| | |<---ACM with cause code---|3 4|<------183 with SDP-------| | |<=========Audio===========| | ** Interwork timer expires ** 5|<----------4xx+-----------| | | |------------REL---------->|6 | |<-----------RLC-----------|7 8|-----------ACK----------->| | 1. When a SIP user wishes to begin a session with a PSTN user, the SIP node issues an INVITE request. 2. Upon receipt of an INVITE request, the gateway maps it to an IAM message and sends it to the ISUP network. 3. Since the ISUP node is unable to complete the call and wants to generate the error tone/announcement itself, it sends an ACM with a cause code. The gateway starts an interwork timer. 4. Upon receipt of an ACM with cause (presence of the CAI parameter), the gateway will generate a 183 message towards the SIP node; this contains SDP to establish early media cut-through. 5. A final INVITE response, based on the cause code received in the earlier ACM message, is generated and sent to the SIP node to terminate the call. See Section 7.2.4.1 for the table which contains the mapping from cause code to SIP response. 6. Upon expiration of the interwork timer, a REL is sent towards the PSTN node to terminate the call. Note that the SIP node can also terminate the call by sending a CANCEL before the interwork timer expires. In this case, the signaling progresses as in Section 7.1.7. 7. Upon receipt of the REL message, the remote ISUP node will reply with an RLC message. 8. The SIP node sends an ACK to acknowledge receipt of the INVITE final response.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 17

7.1.7 Call Canceled by SIP

SIP MGC/MG PSTN 1|---------INVITE---------->| | |<----------100------------| | | |------------IAM---------->|2 | |<=========Audio===========| | |<-----------ACM-----------|3 4|<----------18x------------| | |<=========Audio===========| | | ** MG Releases IP Resources ** | 5|----------CANCEL--------->| | 6|<----------200------------| | | ** MG Releases PSTN Trunk ** | | |------------REL---------->|7 8|<----------487------------| | | |<-----------RLC-----------|9 10|-----------ACK----------->| | 1. When a SIP user wishes to begin a session with a PSTN user, the SIP node issues an INVITE request. 2. Upon receipt of an INVITE request, the gateway maps it to an IAM message and sends it to the ISUP network. 3. The remote ISUP node indicates that the address is sufficient to set up a call by sending back an ACM message. 4. The "called party status" code in the ACM message is mapped to a SIP provisional response (as described in Section 7.2.5 and Section 7.2.6) and returned to the SIP node. This response may contain SDP to establish an early media stream. 5. To cancel the call before it is answered, the SIP node sends a CANCEL request. 6. The CANCEL request is confirmed with a 200 response. 7. Upon receipt of the CANCEL request, the gateway sends a REL message to terminate the ISUP call. 8. The gateway sends a "487 Call Cancelled" message to the SIP node to complete the INVITE transaction. 9. Upon receipt of the REL message, the remote ISUP node will reply with an RLC message.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 18
   10.  Upon receipt of the 487, the SIP node will confirm reception
        with an ACK.

7.2 State Machine

Note that REL can be received in any state; the handling is the same for each case (see Section 10). +---------+ +----------------------->| Idle |<---------------------+ | +----+----+ | | | | | | INVITE/6.2.1 | | V | | T7/6.2.2 +-------------------------+ REL/6.2.4 | +<----------------+ Trying +------------>+ | +-+--------+------+-------+ | | CANCEL/6.2.3 | | | | | +<----------------+ | E.ACM/ | ACM/ | CON/ANM | | | 6.2.5 |6.2.6 | 6.2.7 | | V | | | | T9/6.2.8 +--------------+ | | | +<----------+ Not alerting | | | | | +-------+------+ | | | | CANCEL/6.2.3 | | | | | |<--------------+ | CPG/ | | | | | 6.2.9 | | | | V V | | | T9/6.2.8 +---------------+ | REL/6.2.4 | +<----------------+ Alerting |-|-------------------->| |<----------------+--+-----+------+ | | | CANCEL/6.2.3 | ^ | | | | CPG/ | | | ANM/ | | | 6.2.9 +--+ | 6.2.7 | | | V V | | +-------------------------+ REL/9.2 | | | Waiting for ACK |------------>| | +-------------+-----------+ | | | | | | ACK/6.2.10 | | V | | BYE/9.1 +-------------------------+ REL/9.2 | +<----------------+ Connected +------------>+ +-------------------------+
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 19

7.2.1 INVITE received

When an INVITE request is received by the gateway, a "100 Trying" response MAY be sent back to the SIP network indicating that the gateway is handling the call. The necessary hardware resources for the media stream MUST be reserved in the gateway when the INVITE is received, since an IAM message cannot be sent before the resource reservation (especially TCIC selection) takes place. Typically the resources consist of a time slot in an E1/T1 and an RTP/UDP port on the IP side. Resources might also include any quality-of-service provisions (although no such practices are recommended in this document). After sending the IAM the timer T7 is started. The default value of T7 is between 20 and 30 seconds. The gateway goes to the 'Trying' state.
7.2.1.1 INVITE to IAM procedures
This section details the mapping of the SIP headers in an INVITE message to the ISUP parameters in an Initial Address Message (IAM). A PSTN-SIP gateway is responsible for creating an IAM when it receives an INVITE. Five mandatory parameters appear within the IAM message: the Called Party Number (CPN), the Nature of Connection Indicator (NCI), the Forward Call Indicators (FCI), the Calling Party's Category (CPC), and finally a parameter that indicates the desired bearer characteristics of the call - in some ISUP variants the Transmission Medium Requirement (TMR) is required, in others the User Service Information (USI) (or both). All IAM messages MUST contain these five parameters at a minimum. Thus, every gateway must have a means of populating each of those five parameters when an INVITE is received. Many of the values that will appear in these parameters (such as the NCI or USI) will most likely be the same for each IAM created by the gateway. Others (such as the CPN) will vary on a call-by-call basis; the gateway extracts information from the INVITE in order to properly populate these parameters. There are also quite a few optional parameters that can appear in an IAM message; Q.763 [17] lists 29 in all. However, each of these parameters need not to be translated in order to achieve the goals of SIP-ISUP mapping. As is stated above, translation allows SIP network elements to understand the basic PSTN context of the session (who it is for, and so on) if they are not capable of deciphering any encapsulated ISUP. Parameters that are only meaningful to the PSTN will be carried through PSTN-SIP- PSTN networks via encapsulation -
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 20
   translation is not necessary for these parameters.  Of the
   aforementioned 29 optional parameters, only the following are
   immediately useful for translation: the Calling Party's Number (CIN,
   which is commonly present), Transit Network Selection (TNS), Carrier
   Identification Parameter (CIP, present in ANSI networks), Original
   Called Number (OCN), and the Generic Digits (known in some variants
   as the Generic Address Parameter (GAP)).

   When a SIP INVITE arrives at a PSTN gateway, the gateway SHOULD
   attempt to make use of encapsulated ISUP (see [3]), if any, within
   the INVITE to assist in the formulation of outbound PSTN signaling,
   but SHOULD also heed the security considerations in Section 15.  If
   possible, the gateway SHOULD reuse the values of each of the ISUP
   parameters of the encapsulated IAM as it formulates an IAM that it
   will send across its PSTN interface.  In some cases, the gateway will
   be unable to make use of that ISUP - for example, if the gateway
   cannot understand the ISUP variant and must therefore ignore the
   encapsulated body.  Even when there is comprehensible encapsulated
   ISUP, the relevant values of SIP header fields MUST 'overwrite'
   through the process of translation the parameter values that would
   have been set based on encapsulated ISUP.  In other words, the
   updates to the critical session context parameters that are created
   in the SIP network take precedence, in ISUP-SIP-ISUP bridging cases,
   over the encapsulated ISUP.  This allows many basic services,
   including various sorts of call forwarding and redirection, to be
   implemented in the SIP network.

   For example, if an INVITE arrives at a gateway with an encapsulated
   IAM with a CPN field indicating the telephone number +12025332699,
   but the Request-URI of the INVITE indicates 'tel:+15105550110', the
   gateway MUST use the telephone number in the Request-URI, rather than
   the one in the encapsulated IAM, when creating the IAM that the
   gateway will send to the PSTN.  Further details of how SIP header
   fields are translated into ISUP parameters follow.

   Gateways MUST be provisioned with default values for mandatory ISUP
   parameters that cannot be derived from translation(such as the NCI or
   TMR parameters) for those cases in which no encapsulated ISUP is
   present.  The FCI parameter MUST also have a default, as only the 'M'
   bit of the default may be overwritten during the process of
   translation if the optional number portability translation mechanisms
   described below are used.

   The first step in the translation of the fields of an INVITE message
   to the parameters of an IAM is the inspection of the Request-URI.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 21
   If the optional number portability practices are supported by the
   gateway, then the following steps related to handling of the 'npdi'
   and 'rn' parameters of the Request-URI should be followed.

   If there is no 'npdi=yes' field within the Request-URI, then the
   primary telephone number in the tel URL (the digits immediately
   following 'tel:') MUST be converted to ISUP format, following the
   procedures described in Section 12, and used to populate the CPN
   parameter.

   If the 'npdi=yes' field exists in the Request-URI, then the FCI
   parameter bit for 'number translated' within the IAM MUST reflect
   that a number portability dip has been performed.

   If in addition to the 'npdi=yes' field there is no 'rn=' field
   present, then the main telephone number in the tel URL MUST be
   converted to ISUP format (see Section 12) and used to populate the
   CPN parameter.  This indicates that a portability dip took place, but
   that the called party's number was not ported.

   If in addition to the 'npdi=yes' field an 'rn=' field is present,
   then in ANSI ISUP the 'rn=' field MUST be converted to ISUP format
   and used to populate the CPN.  The main telephone number in the tel
   URL MUST be converted to ISUP format and used to populate the Generic
   Digits Parameter (or GAP in ANSI).  In some other ISUP variants, the
   number given in the 'rn=' field would instead be prepended to the
   main telephone number (with or without a prefix or separator) and the
   combined result MUST be used to populate the CPN.  Once the 'rn=' and
   'npdi=' parameters have been translation, the number portability
   translation practices are complete.

   The following mandatory translation practices are performed after
   number portability translations, if any.

   If number portability practices are not supported by the gateway,
   then the primary telephone number in the tel URL (the digits
   immediately following 'tel:') MUST be converted to ISUP format,
   following the procedures described in Section 12, and used to
   populate the CPN parameter.

   If the primary telephone number in the Request-URI and that of the To
   header are at variance, then the To header SHOULD be used to populate
   an OCN parameter.  Otherwise the To header SHOULD be ignored.

   Some optional translation procedures are provided for carrier-based
   routing.  If the 'cic=' parameter is present in the Request-URI, the
   gateway SHOULD consult local policy to make sure that it is
   appropriate to transmit this Carrier Identification Code (CIC, not to
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 22
   be confused with the MTP3 'circuit identification code') in the IAM;
   if the gateway supports many independent trunks, it may need to
   choose a particular trunk that points to the carrier identified by
   the CIC, or a tandem through which that carrier is reachable.
   Policies for such trunks (based on the preferences of the carriers
   with which the trunks are associated and the ISUP variant in use)
   SHOULD dictate whether the CIP or TNS parameter is used to carry the
   CIC.  In the absence of any pre-arranged policies, the TNS should be
   used when the CPN parameter is in an international format (i.e., the
   tel URL portion of the Request-URI is preceded by a '+', which will
   generate a CPN in international format), and (where supported) the
   CIP should be used in other cases.

   When a SIP call has been routed to a gateway, then the Request-URI
   will most likely contain a tel URL (or a SIP URI with a tel URL user
   portion) - SIP-ISUP gateways that receive Request-URIs that do not
   contain valid telephone numbers SHOULD reject such requests with an
   appropriate response code.  Gateways SHOULD however continue to
   process requests with a From header field that does not contain a
   telephone number, as will sometimes be the case if a call originated
   at a SIP phone that employs a SIP URI user@host convention.  The CIN
   parameter SHOULD be omitted from the outbound IAM if the From field
   is unusable.  Note that as an alternative, gateway implementers MAY
   consider some non-standard way of mapping particular SIP URIs to
   telephone numbers.

   When a gateway receives a message with (comprehensible) encapsulated
   ISUP, it MUST set the FCI indicator in the generated IAM so that all
   interworking-related bits have the same values as their counterparts
   in the encapsulated ISUP.  In most cases, these indicators will state
   that no interworking was encountered, unless interworking has been
   encountered somewhere else in the call path.  If usable encapsulated
   ISUP is not present in an INVITE received by the gateway, it is
   STRONGLY RECOMMENDED that the gateway set the Interworking Indicator
   bit of the FCI to 'no interworking' and the ISDN User Part Indicator
   to 'ISUP used all the way'; the gateway MAY also set the Originating
   Access indicator to 'Originating access non-ISDN' (generally, it is
   not safe to assume that SIP phones will support ISDN endpoint
   services, and the procedures in this document do not detail mappings
   to translate all such services).

   Note that when 'interworking encountered' is set in the FCI parameter
   of the IAM, this indicates that ISUP is interworking with a network
   which is not capable of providing as many services as ISUP does.
   ISUP networks will therefore not employ certain features they
   otherwise normally would, including potentially the use of ISDN cause
   codes in failure conditions (as opposed to sending ACMs followed by
   audible announcements).  If desired, gateway vendors MAY provide a
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 23
   configurable option, usable at the discretion of service providers,
   that will signal in the FCI that interworking has been encountered
   (and that ISUP is not used all the way) when encapsulated ISUP is not
   present; however, doing so may significantly limit the efficiency and
   transparency of SIP-ISUP translation.

   Claiming to be an ISDN node might make the callee request ISDN user
   to user services.  Since user to user services 1 and 2 must be
   requested by the caller, they do not represent a problem (see [14]).
   User to user service 3 can be requested by the callee also.  In non-
   SIP bridging situations, the MGC should be capable of rejecting this
   service request.

7.2.2 ISUP T7 expires

Since no response was received from the PSTN all the resources in the MG are released. A '504 Server Timeout' SHOULD be sent back to the SIP network. A REL message with cause value 102 (protocol error, recovery on timer expiry) SHOULD be sent to the PSTN. Gateways can expect the PSTN to respond with RLC and the SIP network to respond with an ACK indicating that the release sequence has been completed.

7.2.3 CANCEL or BYE received

If a CANCEL or BYE request is received before a final SIP response has been sent, a '200 OK' MUST be sent to the SIP network to confirm the CANCEL or BYE; a 487 MUST also be sent to terminate the INVITE transaction. All the resources are released and a REL message SHOULD be sent to the PSTN with cause value 16 (normal clearing). Gateways can expect an RLC from the PSTN to be received indicating that the release sequence is complete. In SIP bridging situations, a REL might be encapsulated in the body of a BYE request. Although BYE is usually mapped to cause code 16 (normal clearing), under exceptional circumstances the cause code in the REL message might be different. Therefore the Cause Indicator parameter of the encapsulated REL should be re-used in the REL sent to the PSTN. Note that a BYE or CANCEL request may contain a Reason header that SHOULD be mapped to the Cause Indicator parameter (see Section 5.8). If a BYE contains both a Reason header and encapsulated ISUP, the value in the Reason header MUST be preferred. All the resources in the gateway SHOULD be released before the gateway sends any REL message.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 24

7.2.4 REL received

This section applies when a REL is received before a final SIP response has been sent. Typically, this condition arises when a call has been rejected by the PSTN. Any gateway resources SHOULD be released immediately and an RLC MUST be sent to the ISUP network to indicate that the circuit is available for reuse. If the INVITE that originated this transaction contained a legitimate and comprehensible encapsulated ISUP message (i.e., an IAM using a variant supported by the gateway, preferably with a digital signature), then encapsulated ISUP SHOULD be sent in the response to the INVITE when possible (since this suggests an ISUP-SIP-ISUP bridging case) - therefore, the REL message just received SHOULD be included in the body of the SIP response. The gateway SHOULD NOT return a response with encapsulated ISUP if the originator of the INVITE did not enclose ISUP itself. Note that the receipt of certain maintenance messages in response to IAM such as Blocking Message (BLO) or Reset Message (RSC) (or their circuit group message equivalents) may also result in the teardown of calls in this phase of the state machine. Behavior for maintenance messages is given below in Section 11.
7.2.4.1 ISDN Cause Code to Status Code Mapping
The use of the REL message in the SS7 network is very general, whereas SIP has a number of specific tools that, collectively, play the same role as REL - namely BYE, CANCEL, and the various status/response codes. An REL can be sent to tear down a call that is already in progress (BYE), to cancel a previously sent call setup request that has not yet been completed (CANCEL), or to reject a call setup request (IAM) that has just been received (corresponding to a SIP status code). Note that it is not necessarily appropriate to map some ISDN cause codes to SIP messages because these cause codes are only meaningful to the ISUP interface of a gateway. A good example of this is cause code 44 "Request circuit or channel not available." 44 signifies that the CIC for which an IAM had been sent was believed by the receiving equipment to be in a state incompatible with a new call request - however, the appropriate behavior in this case is for the originating switch to re-send the IAM for a different CIC, not for the call to be torn down. Clearly, there is not (nor should there be) an SIP status code indicating that a new CIC should be selected - this matter is internal to the originating gateway. Hence receipt of cause code 44
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 25
   should not result in any SIP status code being sent; effectively, the
   cause code is untranslatable.

   If a cause value other than those listed below is received, the
   default response '500 Server internal error' SHOULD be used.

   Finally, in addition to the ISDN Cause Code, the CAI parameter also
   contains a cause 'location' that gives some sense of which entity in
   the network was responsible for terminating the call (the most
   important distinction being between the user and the network).  In
   most cases, the cause location does not affect the mapping to a SIP
   status code; some exceptions are noted below.  A diagnostic field may
   also be present for some ISDN causes; this diagnostic will contain
   additional data pertaining to the termination of the call.

   The following mapping values are RECOMMENDED:

   Normal event

   ISUP Cause value                        SIP response
   ----------------                        ------------
   1  unallocated number                   404 Not Found
   2  no route to network                  404 Not found
   3  no route to destination              404 Not found
   16 normal call clearing                 --- (*)
   17 user busy                            486 Busy here
   18 no user responding                   408 Request Timeout
   19 no answer from the user              480 Temporarily unavailable
   20 subscriber absent                    480 Temporarily unavailable
   21 call rejected                        403 Forbidden (+)
   22 number changed (w/o diagnostic)      410 Gone
   22 number changed (w/ diagnostic)       301 Moved Permanently
   23 redirection to new destination       410 Gone
   26 non-selected user clearing           404 Not Found (=)
   27 destination out of order             502 Bad Gateway
   28 address incomplete                   484 Address incomplete
   29 facility rejected                    501 Not implemented
   31 normal unspecified                   480 Temporarily unavailable

   (*) ISDN Cause 16 will usually result in a BYE or CANCEL

   (+) If the cause location is 'user' than the 6xx code could be given
   rather than the 4xx code (i.e., 403 becomes 603)

   (=) ANSI procedure - in ANSI networks, 26 is overloaded to signify
   'misrouted ported number'.  Presumably, a number portability dip
   should have been performed by a prior network.  Otherwise cause 26 is
   usually not used in ISUP procedures.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 26
   A REL with ISDN cause 22 (number changed) might contain information
   about a new number where the callee might be reachable in the
   diagnostic field.  If the MGC is able to process this information it
   SHOULD be added to the SIP response (301) in a Contact header.

   Resource unavailable

   This kind of cause value indicates a temporary failure.  A 'Retry-
   After' header MAY be added to the response if appropriate.

   ISUP Cause value                        SIP response
   ----------------                        ------------
   34 no circuit available                 503 Service unavailable
   38 network out of order                 503 Service unavailable
   41 temporary failure                    503 Service unavailable
   42 switching equipment congestion       503 Service unavailable
   47 resource unavailable                 503 Service unavailable

   Service or option not available

   This kind of cause value indicates that there is a problem with the
   request, rather than something that will resolve itself over time.

   ISUP Cause value                        SIP response
   ----------------                        ------------
   55 incoming calls barred within CUG     403 Forbidden
   57 bearer capability not authorized     403 Forbidden
   58 bearer capability not presently      503 Service unavailable
      available

   Service or option not available

   ISUP Cause value                        SIP response
   ----------------                        ------------
   65 bearer capability not implemented    488 Not Acceptable Here
   70 only restricted digital avail        488 Not Acceptable Here
   79 service or option not implemented    501 Not implemented

   Invalid message

   ISUP Cause value                        SIP response
   ----------------                        ------------
   87 user not member of CUG               403 Forbidden
   88 incompatible destination             503 Service unavailable
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 27
   Protocol error

   ISUP Cause value                        SIP response
   ----------------                        ------------
   102 recovery of timer expiry            504 Gateway timeout
   111 protocol error                      500 Server internal error

   Interworking

   ISUP Cause value                        SIP response
   ----------------                        ------------
   127 interworking unspecified            500 Server internal error

7.2.5 Early ACM received

An ACM message is sent in certain situations to indicate that the call is in progress in order to satisfy ISUP timers, rather than to signify that the callee is being alerted. This occurs for example in mobile networks, where roaming can delay call setup significantly. The early ACM is sent before the user is alerted to reset T7 and start T9. An ACM is considered an 'early ACM' if the Called Party's Status Indicator is set to 00 (no indication). After sending an early ACM, the ISUP network can be expected to indicate the further progress of the call by sending CPGs. When an early ACM is received the gateway SHOULD send a 183 Session Progress response (see [1]) to the SIP network. In SIP bridging situations (where encapsulated ISUP was contained in the INVITE that initiated this call) the early ACM SHOULD also be included in the response body. Note that sending 183 before a gateway has confirmation that the address is complete (ACM) creates known problems in SIP bridging cases, and it SHOULD NOT therefore be sent.

7.2.6 ACM received

Most commonly, on receipt of an ACM a provisional response (in the 18x class) SHOULD be sent to the SIP network. If the INVITE that initiated this session contained legitimate and comprehensible encapsulated ISUP, then the ACM received by the gateway SHOULD be encapsulated in the provisional response. If the ACM contains a Backward Call Indicators parameter with a value of 'subscriber free', the gateway SHOULD send a '180 Ringing' response. When a 180 is sent, it is assumed, in the absence of any early media extension, that any necessary ringback tones will be
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 28
   generated locally by the SIP user agent to which the gateway is
   responding (which may in turn be a gateway).

   If the Backward Call Indicators (BCI) parameter of the ACM indicates
   that interworking has been encountered (generally designating that
   the ISUP network sending the ACM is interworking with a less
   sophisticated network which cannot report its status via out-of-band
   signaling), then there may be in-band announcements of call status
   such as an audible busy tone or caller intercept message, and if
   possible a backwards media transmission SHOULD be initiated.
   Backwards media SHOULD also be transmitted if the Optional Backward
   Call Indicators parameter field for in-band media is set.  For more
   information on early media (before 200 OK/ANM) see Section 5.5.
   After early media transmission has been initiated, the gateway SHOULD
   send a 183 Session Progress response code.

   Gateways MAY have some means of ascertaining the disposition of in-
   band audio media; for example, a way of determining by inspecting
   signaling in some ISUP variants, or by listening to the audio, that
   ringing, or a busy tone, is being played over the circuit.  Such
   gateways MAY elect to discard the media and send the corresponding
   response code (such as 180 or 486) in its stead.  However, the
   implementation of such a gateway would entail overcoming a number of
   known challenges that are outside the scope of this document.

   When they receive an ACM, switches in many ISUP networks start a
   timer known as "T9" which usually lasts between 90 seconds and 3
   minutes (see [13]).  When early media is being played, this timer
   permits the caller to hear backwards audio media (in the form
   ringback, tones or announcements) from a remote switch in the ISUP
   network for that period of time without incurring any charge for the
   connection.  The nearest possible local ISUP exchange to the callee
   generates the ringback tone or voice announcements.  If longer
   announcements have to be played, the network has to send an ANM,
   which initiates bidirectional media of indefinite duration.  In
   common ISUP network practice, billing commences when the ANM is
   received.  Some networks do not support timer T9.

7.2.7 CON or ANM Received

When an ANM or CON message is received, the call has been answered and thus '200 OK' response SHOULD be sent to the SIP network. This 200 OK SHOULD contain an answer to the media offered in the INVITE. In SIP bridging situations (when the INVITE that initiated this call contained legitimate and comprehensible encapsulated ISUP), the ISUP message is included in the body of the 200 OK response. If it has not done so already, the gateway MUST establish a bidirectional media stream at this time.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 29
   When there is interworking with some legacy networks, it is possible
   for an ISUP switch to receive an ANM immediately after an early ACM
   (without CPG or any other backwards messaging), or without receiving
   any ACM at all (when an automaton answers the call).  In this
   situation the SIP user will never have received a 18x provisional
   response, and consequently they will not hear any kind of ringtone
   before the callee answers.  This may result in some clipping of the
   initial forward media from the caller (since forward media
   transmission cannot commence until SDP has been acquired from the
   destination).  In ISDN (see [12]) this is solved by connecting the
   voice path backwards before sending the IAM.

7.2.8 Timer T9 Expires

The expiry of this timer (which is not used in all networks) signifies that an ANM has not arrived a significant period of time after alerting began (with the transmission of an ACM) for this call. Usually, this means that the callee's terminal has been alerted for many rings but has not been answered. It may also occur in interworking cases when the network is playing a status announcement (such as one indicating that a number is not in service) that has cycled several times. Whatever the cause of the protracted incomplete call, when this timer expires the call MUST be released. All of the gateway resources related to the media path SHOULD be released. A '480 Temporarily Unavailable' response code SHOULD be sent to the SIP network, and an REL message with cause value 19 (no answer from the user) SHOULD be sent to the ISUP network. The PSTN can be expected to respond with an RLC and the SIP network to respond with an ACK indicating that the release sequence has been completed.

7.2.9 CPG Received

A CPG is a provisional message that can indicate progress, alerting or in-band information. If a CPG suggests that in-band information is available, the gateway SHOULD begin to transmit early media and cut through the unidirectional backwards media path.
Top   ToC   RFC3398 - Page 30
   In SIP bridging situations (when the INVITE that initiated this
   session contained legitimate and comprehensible encapsulated ISUP),
   the CPG SHOULD be sent in the body of a particular 18x response,
   determined from the CPG Event Code as follows:

   ISUP event code                         SIP response
   ----------------                        ------------
   1 Alerting                              180 Ringing
   2 Progress                              183 Session progress
   3 In-band information                   183 Session progress
   4 Call forward; line busy               181 Call is being forwarded
   5 Call forward; no reply                181 Call is being forwarded
   6 Call forward; unconditional           181 Call is being forwarded
   - (no event code present)               183 Session progress

   Note that if the CPG does not indicate "Alerting," the current state
   will not change.

7.3 ACK received

At this stage, the call is fully connected and the conversation can take place. No ISUP message should be sent by the gateway when an ACK is received.


(page 30 continued on part 2)

Next Section