Tech-invite3GPPspecsSIPRFCs
898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100

in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 7159

The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format

Pages: 16
Obsoletes:  46277158
Obsoleted by:  8259

ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 1
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                      T. Bray, Ed.
Request for Comments: 7159                                  Google, Inc.
Obsoletes: 4627, 7158                                         March 2014
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721


     The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format

Abstract

JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) is a lightweight, text-based, language-independent data interchange format. It was derived from the ECMAScript Programming Language Standard. JSON defines a small set of formatting rules for the portable representation of structured data. This document removes inconsistencies with other specifications of JSON, repairs specification errors, and offers experience-based interoperability guidance. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7159.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 2
Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

   This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
   Contributions published or made publicly available before November
   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
   than English.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 3

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ....................................................3 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document ..........................4 1.2. Specifications of JSON .....................................4 1.3. Introduction to This Revision ..............................4 2. JSON Grammar ....................................................4 3. Values ..........................................................5 4. Objects .........................................................6 5. Arrays ..........................................................6 6. Numbers .........................................................6 7. Strings .........................................................8 8. String and Character Issues .....................................9 8.1. Character Encoding .........................................9 8.2. Unicode Characters .........................................9 8.3. String Comparison ..........................................9 9. Parsers ........................................................10 10. Generators ....................................................10 11. IANA Considerations ...........................................10 12. Security Considerations .......................................11 13. Examples ......................................................12 14. Contributors ..................................................13 15. References ....................................................13 15.1. Normative References .....................................13 15.2. Informative References ...................................13 Appendix A. Changes from RFC 4627 .................................15

1. Introduction

JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) is a text format for the serialization of structured data. It is derived from the object literals of JavaScript, as defined in the ECMAScript Programming Language Standard, Third Edition [ECMA-262]. JSON can represent four primitive types (strings, numbers, booleans, and null) and two structured types (objects and arrays). A string is a sequence of zero or more Unicode characters [UNICODE]. Note that this citation references the latest version of Unicode rather than a specific release. It is not expected that future changes in the UNICODE specification will impact the syntax of JSON. An object is an unordered collection of zero or more name/value pairs, where a name is a string and a value is a string, number, boolean, null, object, or array. An array is an ordered sequence of zero or more values.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 4
   The terms "object" and "array" come from the conventions of
   JavaScript.

   JSON's design goals were for it to be minimal, portable, textual, and
   a subset of JavaScript.

1.1. Conventions Used in This Document

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. The grammatical rules in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC5234].

1.2. Specifications of JSON

This document updates [RFC4627], which describes JSON and registers the media type "application/json". A description of JSON in ECMAScript terms appears in Version 5.1 of the ECMAScript specification [ECMA-262], Section 15.12. JSON is also described in [ECMA-404]. All of the specifications of JSON syntax agree on the syntactic elements of the language.

1.3. Introduction to This Revision

In the years since the publication of RFC 4627, JSON has found very wide use. This experience has revealed certain patterns, which, while allowed by its specifications, have caused interoperability problems. Also, a small number of errata have been reported (see RFC Errata IDs 607 [Err607] and 3607 [Err3607]). This document's goal is to apply the errata, remove inconsistencies with other specifications of JSON, and highlight practices that can lead to interoperability problems.

2. JSON Grammar

A JSON text is a sequence of tokens. The set of tokens includes six structural characters, strings, numbers, and three literal names. A JSON text is a serialized value. Note that certain previous specifications of JSON constrained a JSON text to be an object or an
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 5
   array.  Implementations that generate only objects or arrays where a
   JSON text is called for will be interoperable in the sense that all
   implementations will accept these as conforming JSON texts.

      JSON-text = ws value ws

   These are the six structural characters:

      begin-array     = ws %x5B ws  ; [ left square bracket

      begin-object    = ws %x7B ws  ; { left curly bracket

      end-array       = ws %x5D ws  ; ] right square bracket

      end-object      = ws %x7D ws  ; } right curly bracket

      name-separator  = ws %x3A ws  ; : colon

      value-separator = ws %x2C ws  ; , comma

   Insignificant whitespace is allowed before or after any of the six
   structural characters.

      ws = *(
              %x20 /              ; Space
              %x09 /              ; Horizontal tab
              %x0A /              ; Line feed or New line
              %x0D )              ; Carriage return

3. Values

A JSON value MUST be an object, array, number, or string, or one of the following three literal names: false null true The literal names MUST be lowercase. No other literal names are allowed. value = false / null / true / object / array / number / string false = %x66.61.6c.73.65 ; false null = %x6e.75.6c.6c ; null true = %x74.72.75.65 ; true
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 6

4. Objects

An object structure is represented as a pair of curly brackets surrounding zero or more name/value pairs (or members). A name is a string. A single colon comes after each name, separating the name from the value. A single comma separates a value from a following name. The names within an object SHOULD be unique. object = begin-object [ member *( value-separator member ) ] end-object member = string name-separator value An object whose names are all unique is interoperable in the sense that all software implementations receiving that object will agree on the name-value mappings. When the names within an object are not unique, the behavior of software that receives such an object is unpredictable. Many implementations report the last name/value pair only. Other implementations report an error or fail to parse the object, and some implementations report all of the name/value pairs, including duplicates. JSON parsing libraries have been observed to differ as to whether or not they make the ordering of object members visible to calling software. Implementations whose behavior does not depend on member ordering will be interoperable in the sense that they will not be affected by these differences.

5. Arrays

An array structure is represented as square brackets surrounding zero or more values (or elements). Elements are separated by commas. array = begin-array [ value *( value-separator value ) ] end-array There is no requirement that the values in an array be of the same type.

6. Numbers

The representation of numbers is similar to that used in most programming languages. A number is represented in base 10 using decimal digits. It contains an integer component that may be prefixed with an optional minus sign, which may be followed by a fraction part and/or an exponent part. Leading zeros are not allowed. A fraction part is a decimal point followed by one or more digits.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 7
   An exponent part begins with the letter E in upper or lower case,
   which may be followed by a plus or minus sign.  The E and optional
   sign are followed by one or more digits.

   Numeric values that cannot be represented in the grammar below (such
   as Infinity and NaN) are not permitted.

      number = [ minus ] int [ frac ] [ exp ]

      decimal-point = %x2E       ; .

      digit1-9 = %x31-39         ; 1-9

      e = %x65 / %x45            ; e E

      exp = e [ minus / plus ] 1*DIGIT

      frac = decimal-point 1*DIGIT

      int = zero / ( digit1-9 *DIGIT )

      minus = %x2D               ; -

      plus = %x2B                ; +

      zero = %x30                ; 0

   This specification allows implementations to set limits on the range
   and precision of numbers accepted.  Since software that implements
   IEEE 754-2008 binary64 (double precision) numbers [IEEE754] is
   generally available and widely used, good interoperability can be
   achieved by implementations that expect no more precision or range
   than these provide, in the sense that implementations will
   approximate JSON numbers within the expected precision.  A JSON
   number such as 1E400 or 3.141592653589793238462643383279 may indicate
   potential interoperability problems, since it suggests that the
   software that created it expects receiving software to have greater
   capabilities for numeric magnitude and precision than is widely
   available.

   Note that when such software is used, numbers that are integers and
   are in the range [-(2**53)+1, (2**53)-1] are interoperable in the
   sense that implementations will agree exactly on their numeric
   values.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 8

7. Strings

The representation of strings is similar to conventions used in the C family of programming languages. A string begins and ends with quotation marks. All Unicode characters may be placed within the quotation marks, except for the characters that must be escaped: quotation mark, reverse solidus, and the control characters (U+0000 through U+001F). Any character may be escaped. If the character is in the Basic Multilingual Plane (U+0000 through U+FFFF), then it may be represented as a six-character sequence: a reverse solidus, followed by the lowercase letter u, followed by four hexadecimal digits that encode the character's code point. The hexadecimal letters A though F can be upper or lower case. So, for example, a string containing only a single reverse solidus character may be represented as "\u005C". Alternatively, there are two-character sequence escape representations of some popular characters. So, for example, a string containing only a single reverse solidus character may be represented more compactly as "\\". To escape an extended character that is not in the Basic Multilingual Plane, the character is represented as a 12-character sequence, encoding the UTF-16 surrogate pair. So, for example, a string containing only the G clef character (U+1D11E) may be represented as "\uD834\uDD1E". string = quotation-mark *char quotation-mark char = unescaped / escape ( %x22 / ; " quotation mark U+0022 %x5C / ; \ reverse solidus U+005C %x2F / ; / solidus U+002F %x62 / ; b backspace U+0008 %x66 / ; f form feed U+000C %x6E / ; n line feed U+000A %x72 / ; r carriage return U+000D %x74 / ; t tab U+0009 %x75 4HEXDIG ) ; uXXXX U+XXXX escape = %x5C ; \ quotation-mark = %x22 ; " unescaped = %x20-21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-10FFFF
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 9

8. String and Character Issues

8.1. Character Encoding

JSON text SHALL be encoded in UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32. The default encoding is UTF-8, and JSON texts that are encoded in UTF-8 are interoperable in the sense that they will be read successfully by the maximum number of implementations; there are many implementations that cannot successfully read texts in other encodings (such as UTF-16 and UTF-32). Implementations MUST NOT add a byte order mark to the beginning of a JSON text. In the interests of interoperability, implementations that parse JSON texts MAY ignore the presence of a byte order mark rather than treating it as an error.

8.2. Unicode Characters

When all the strings represented in a JSON text are composed entirely of Unicode characters [UNICODE] (however escaped), then that JSON text is interoperable in the sense that all software implementations that parse it will agree on the contents of names and of string values in objects and arrays. However, the ABNF in this specification allows member names and string values to contain bit sequences that cannot encode Unicode characters; for example, "\uDEAD" (a single unpaired UTF-16 surrogate). Instances of this have been observed, for example, when a library truncates a UTF-16 string without checking whether the truncation split a surrogate pair. The behavior of software that receives JSON texts containing such values is unpredictable; for example, implementations might return different values for the length of a string value or even suffer fatal runtime exceptions.

8.3. String Comparison

Software implementations are typically required to test names of object members for equality. Implementations that transform the textual representation into sequences of Unicode code units and then perform the comparison numerically, code unit by code unit, are interoperable in the sense that implementations will agree in all cases on equality or inequality of two strings. For example, implementations that compare strings with escaped characters unconverted may incorrectly find that "a\\b" and "a\u005Cb" are not equal.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 10

9. Parsers

A JSON parser transforms a JSON text into another representation. A JSON parser MUST accept all texts that conform to the JSON grammar. A JSON parser MAY accept non-JSON forms or extensions. An implementation may set limits on the size of texts that it accepts. An implementation may set limits on the maximum depth of nesting. An implementation may set limits on the range and precision of numbers. An implementation may set limits on the length and character contents of strings.

10. Generators

A JSON generator produces JSON text. The resulting text MUST strictly conform to the JSON grammar.

11. IANA Considerations

The MIME media type for JSON text is application/json. Type name: application Subtype name: json Required parameters: n/a Optional parameters: n/a Encoding considerations: binary Security considerations: See [RFC7159], Section 12. Interoperability considerations: Described in [RFC7159] Published specification: [RFC7159] Applications that use this media type: JSON has been used to exchange data between applications written in all of these programming languages: ActionScript, C, C#, Clojure, ColdFusion, Common Lisp, E, Erlang, Go, Java, JavaScript, Lua, Objective CAML, Perl, PHP, Python, Rebol, Ruby, Scala, and Scheme.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 11
   Additional information:
      Magic number(s): n/a
      File extension(s): .json
      Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT

   Person & email address to contact for further information:
      IESG
      <iesg@ietf.org>

   Intended usage:  COMMON

   Restrictions on usage:  none

   Author:
      Douglas Crockford
      <douglas@crockford.com>

   Change controller:
      IESG
      <iesg@ietf.org>

   Note:  No "charset" parameter is defined for this registration.
      Adding one really has no effect on compliant recipients.

12. Security Considerations

Generally, there are security issues with scripting languages. JSON is a subset of JavaScript but excludes assignment and invocation. Since JSON's syntax is borrowed from JavaScript, it is possible to use that language's "eval()" function to parse JSON texts. This generally constitutes an unacceptable security risk, since the text could contain executable code along with data declarations. The same consideration applies to the use of eval()-like functions in any other programming language in which JSON texts conform to that language's syntax.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 12

13. Examples

This is a JSON object: { "Image": { "Width": 800, "Height": 600, "Title": "View from 15th Floor", "Thumbnail": { "Url": "http://www.example.com/image/481989943", "Height": 125, "Width": 100 }, "Animated" : false, "IDs": [116, 943, 234, 38793] } } Its Image member is an object whose Thumbnail member is an object and whose IDs member is an array of numbers. This is a JSON array containing two objects: [ { "precision": "zip", "Latitude": 37.7668, "Longitude": -122.3959, "Address": "", "City": "SAN FRANCISCO", "State": "CA", "Zip": "94107", "Country": "US" }, { "precision": "zip", "Latitude": 37.371991, "Longitude": -122.026020, "Address": "", "City": "SUNNYVALE", "State": "CA", "Zip": "94085", "Country": "US" } ]
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 13
   Here are three small JSON texts containing only values:

   "Hello world!"

   42

   true

14. Contributors

RFC 4627 was written by Douglas Crockford. This document was constructed by making a relatively small number of changes to that document; thus, the vast majority of the text here is his.

15. References

15.1. Normative References

[IEEE754] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic", IEEE Standard 754, August 2008, <http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/754/>. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC5234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. [UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard", <http://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/>.

15.2. Informative References

[ECMA-262] Ecma International, "ECMAScript Language Specification Edition 5.1", Standard ECMA-262, June 2011, <http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/ Ecma-262.htm>. [ECMA-404] Ecma International, "The JSON Data Interchange Format", Standard ECMA-404, October 2013, <http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/ Ecma-404.htm>. [Err3607] RFC Errata, Errata ID 3607, RFC 3607, <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 14
   [Err607]   RFC Errata, Errata ID 607, RFC 607,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.

   [RFC4627]  Crockford, D., "The application/json Media Type for
              JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)", RFC 4627, July 2006.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 15

Appendix A. Changes from RFC 4627

This section lists changes between this document and the text in RFC 4627. o Changed the title and abstract of the document. o Changed the reference to [UNICODE] to be not version specific. o Added a "Specifications of JSON" section. o Added an "Introduction to This Revision" section. o Changed the definition of "JSON text" so that it can be any JSON value, removing the constraint that it be an object or array. o Added language about duplicate object member names, member ordering, and interoperability. o Clarified the absence of a requirement that values in an array be of the same JSON type. o Applied erratum #607 from RFC 4627 to correctly align the artwork for the definition of "object". o Changed "as sequences of digits" to "in the grammar below" in the "Numbers" section, and made base-10-ness explicit. o Added language about number interoperability as a function of IEEE754, and added an IEEE754 reference. o Added language about interoperability and Unicode characters and about string comparisons. To do this, turned the old "Encoding" section into a "String and Character Issues" section, with three subsections: "Character Encoding", "Unicode Characters", and "String Comparison". o Changed guidance in the "Parsers" section to point out that implementations may set limits on the range "and precision" of numbers. o Updated and tidied the "IANA Considerations" section. o Made a real "Security Considerations" section and lifted the text out of the previous "IANA Considerations" section.
ToP   noToC   RFC7159 - Page 16
   o  Applied erratum #3607 from RFC 4627 by removing the security
      consideration that begins "A JSON text can be safely passed" and
      the JavaScript code that went with that consideration.

   o  Added a note to the "Security Considerations" section pointing out
      the risks of using the "eval()" function in JavaScript or any
      other language in which JSON texts conform to that language's
      syntax.

   o  Added a note to the "IANA Considerations" clarifying the absence
      of a "charset" parameter for the application/json media type.

   o  Changed "100" to 100 and added a boolean field, both in the first
      example.

   o  Added examples of JSON texts with simple values, neither objects
      nor arrays.

   o  Added a "Contributors" section crediting Douglas Crockford.

   o  Added a reference to RFC 4627.

   o  Moved the ECMAScript reference from Normative to Informative and
      updated it to reference ECMAScript 5.1, and added a reference to
      ECMA 404.

Author's Address

Tim Bray (editor) Google, Inc. EMail: tbray@textuality.com