Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETF RFCsSIP
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 2609

Service Templates and Service: Schemes

Pages: 33
Proposed Standard
Updates:  2165

Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 1
Network Working Group                                        E. Guttman
Request for Comments: 2609                                   C. Perkins
Updates: 2165                                                  J. Kempf
Category: Standards Track                              Sun Microsystems
                                                              June 1999

                 Service Templates and Service: Schemes

Status of This Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.


The "service:" URL scheme name is used to define URLs (called "service: URLs" in this document) that are primarily intended to be used by the Service Location Protocol in order to distribute service access information. These schemes provide an extensible framework for client-based network software to obtain configuration information required to make use of network services. When registering a service: URL, the URL is accompanied by a set of well-defined attributes which define the service. These attributes convey configuration information to client software, or service characteristics meaningful to end users. This document describes a formal procedure for defining and standardizing new service types and attributes for use with the "service:" scheme. The formal descriptions of service types and attributes are templates that are human and machine understandable. They SHOULD be used by administrative tools to parse service registration information and by client applications to provide localized translations of service attribute strings.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 2

Table of Contents

1. Introduction 2 1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Service Location Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.2.1. Compatibility with SLPv1 . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2. Service URL Syntax and Semantics 5 2.1. Service URL Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2. Service URL Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3. Use of service: URLs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.4. Specifying the Service Type-Specific URL Syntax. . . . 10 2.5. Accommodating Abstract Service Types . . . . . . . . 10 2.5.1. Advertising Abstract Service Types . . . . . . 11 3. Syntax and Semantics of Service Type Specifications 12 3.1. Syntax of Service Type Templates . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2. Semantics of Service Type Templates. . . . . . . . . . 15 3.2.1. Definition of a Service Template . . . . . . . 15 3.2.2. Service Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.3. Version Number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.4. Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.5. Syntax of the Service Type-specific URL Part . 17 3.2.6. Attribute Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4. A Process For Standardizing New Service Types 21 5. IANA Considerations 22 6. Internationalization Considerations 24 6.1. Language Identification and Translation. . . . . . . . 24 7. Security Considerations 25 A. Service Template Examples 26 A.1. FOO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 26 A.2. Abstract Service Type: Net-Transducer . . . . . . . . 28 A.3. Concrete Service Type: Net-Transducer:Thermometer . . 29 A.4. service: URLs and SLP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 B. Acknowledgments 30 C. References 31 D. Authors' Addresses 32 E. Full Copyright Statement 33

1. Introduction

This document describes a URL scheme, called service: URL, which defines network access information for network services using a formal notation. In addition it describes how to define a set of attributes to associate with a service: URL. These attributes will allow end users and programs to select between network services of the same type that have different capabilities. The attributes are defined in a template document that is readable by people and machines.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 3
   A client uses attributes to select a particular service.  Service
   selection occurs by obtaining the service: URL that offers the right
   configuration for the client.  Service type templates define the
   syntax of service: URLs for a particular service type, as well as the
   attributes which accompany a service: URL in a service registration.

   Templates are used for the following distinct purposes:

    1. Standardization

       The template is reviewed before it is standardized.  Once it is
       standardized, all versions of the template are archived by IANA.

    2. Service Registration

       Servers making use of the Service Location Protocol [10] register
       themselves and their attributes.  They use the templates to
       generate the service registrations.  In registering, the service
       must use the specified values for its attributes.

    3. Client presentation of Service Information

       Client applications may display service information.  The
       template provides type information and explanatory text which may
       be helpful in producing user interfaces.

    4. Internationalization

       Entities with access to the template for a given service type in
       two different languages may translate between the two languages.

       A service may register itself in more than one language using
       templates, though it has been configured by an operator who
       registered service attributes in a single language.

   All grammar encoding follows the Augmented BNF (ABNF) [8] for syntax

1.1. Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [6].
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 4
   The following terminology is used for describing service: URLs.

      service scheme

         A URL scheme whose name starts with the string "service:" and
         is followed by the service type name, constructed according to
         the rules in this document.

      service: URL

         A URL constructed according to the service scheme definition.
         It typically provides at least the following:  The name of an
         access protocol, and an address locating this service.  The
         service: URL may include url path information specific to the
         type of service, as well as attribute information encoded
         according to the URL grammar.  The service: URL is used by the
         Service Location Protocol to register and discover the location
         of services.  It may be used by other protocols and in
         documents as well.

      service type

         A name identifying the semantics by which the remainder of the
         service: URL is to be understood.  It may denote either a
         particular network protocol, or an abstract service associated
         with a variety of protocols.  If the service type denotes a
         particular protocol, then the service type name SHOULD either
         be assigned the name of a particular well known port [2] by
         convention or be the Assigned Numbers name for the service [1].

      abstract service type

         A service type name which is associated with a variety of
         different protocols.  An example is given in Section A.
         Section 2 discusses various ways that abstract types can be

      service registration

         A service: URL and optionally a set of attributes comprise a
         service registration.  This registration is made by or on
         behalf of a given service.  The URL syntax and attributes must
         conform to the service template for the registered service.

      service template

         A formal description of the service attributes and service
         scheme associated with a particular service type.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 5

1.2. Service Location Protocol

The Service Location Protocol version 2 [10] allows service: URLs to be registered and discovered, though service: URLs may be also used in other contexts. Client applications discover service registrations by issuing queries for services of a particular type, specifying the attributes of the service: URLs to return. Clients retrieve the attributes of a particular service by supplying its service: URL. Attributes for all service registrations of a particular type can also be retrieved. Services may register themselves, or registrations may be made on their behalf. These registrations contain a service: URL, and possibly attributes and digital signatures.

1.2.1. Compatibility with SLPv1

This document adopts the encoding conventions of SLPv2. Compatibility with SLPv1 [[15]] is possible, if the following conventions are observed: 1. Abstract service types must not be used. SLPv2 specifies the use of Service URLs with abstract service types. SLPv1 does not support them. Thus, a service template which is to serve both SLPv1 and SLPv2 must not use abstract service types. 2. The syntax for representing opaque values in this document is consistent with SLPv2. The syntax must be converted for use with SLPv1. Instead of a sequence of "\FF" then "\" HEXDIG HEXDIG for each byte in the opaque value, SLPv1 uses radix-64 notation. 3. Escape characters are significantly differently in SLPv1 and SLPv2. Instead of using escaped byte notation for escaped characters, SLPv1 uses the HTML convention `&' `#' 1*DIGIT `;'.

2. Service URL Syntax and Semantics

This section describes the syntax and semantics of service: URLs.

2.1. Service URL Syntax

The syntax of the service: URL MUST conform to an 'absolute URI' as defined by [5]. The syntax of a service: URL differs enough from a 'generic URI' that it is best to treat it as an opaque URI unless a specific parser for the service: URL is available.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 6
   All service:  URLs have the same syntax up to the 'url-part' The
   syntax for a service URL depends on the service type following the
   service scheme.  All service:  URLs have a service access point
   portion, indicating the address of the service to access.

   The syntax for the <sap> field depends upon the service type
   definition.  The <sap> field is the service access point, and
   describes how to access the service.  In addition, although both
   upper case and lower case characters are recognized in the <service-
   type> field for convenience, the name is case-folded into lower case.
   Service types are therefore not distinguished on the basis of case,
   so, for example, "http" and "HTTP" designate the same service type.
   This is consistent with general URL practice, as outlined in [5].

   The ABNF for a service: URL is:

      service: URL    =   "service:" service-type ":" sap
      service-type    =   abstract-type ":" url-scheme / concrete-type
      abstract-type   =   type-name [ "." naming-auth ]
      concrete-type   =   protocol [ "." naming-auth ]
      type-name       =   resname
      naming-auth     =   resname
      url-scheme      =   resname
                          ; A recognized URL scheme name, standardized
                          ; either through common practice or through
                          ; approval of a standards body.
      resname         =   ALPHA [ 1*(ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-") ]
      sap             =   site [url-part]
      site            =   ipsite / atsite / ipxsite
      ipsite          =   "//" [ [ user "@" ] hostport ]
      hostport        =   host [ ":" port ]
      host            =   hostname / hostnumber
      hostname        =   *( domainlabel "." ) toplabel
      alphanum        =   ALPHA / DIGIT
      domainlabel     =   alphanum / alphanum *[alphanum / "-"] alphanum
      toplabel        =   ALPHA / ALPHA *[ alphanum / "-" ] alphanum
      hostnumber      =   ipv4-number
      ipv4-number     =   1*3DIGIT 3("." 1*3DIGIT)
      port            =   1*DIGIT
                          ; A port number must be included if the
                          ; protocol field does not have an IANA
                          ; assigned port number.
      user            =   *[ uchar / ";" / "+" / "&" / "=" ]
      ipxsite         =   "/ipx/" ipx-net ":" ipx-node ":" ipx-socket
      ipx-net         =   8 HEXDIGIT
      ipx-node        =   12 HEXDIGIT
      ipx-socket      =   4 HEXDIGIT
      atsite          =   "/at/" at-object ":" at-type "" at-zone
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 7
      at-object       =   1*31apple-char
      at-type         =   1*31apple-char
      at-zone         =   1*31apple-char
      apple-char      =   ALPHA / DIGIT / safe / escaped
                      =   ; AppleAscii [7] values that are not
                      =   ; from the restricted range must be escaped.
                      =   ; NOTE: The escaped values do NOT correspond
                      =   ; to UTF-8 values here:  They are AppleAscii
                      =   ; bytes.
      url-part        =   [ url-path ] [ attr-list ]
      url-path        =   1 * ( "/" *xchar )
                          ; Each service type must define its
                          ; own syntax consistent
                          ; with [5].
      attr-list       =   1 * ( ";" attr-asgn )
      attr-asgn       =   attr-id / attr-id "=" attr-value
      safe            =   "$" / "-" / "_" / "." / "~"
      extra           =   "!" / "*" / "'" / "(" / ")" / "," / "+"
      uchar           =   unreserved / escaped
      xchar           =   unreserved / reserved / escaped
      escaped         =   1*(`\' HEXDIG HEXDIG)
      reserved        =   ";" / "/" / "?" / ":" / "@" / "&" / "=" / "+"
      unreserved      =   ALPHA / DIGIT / safe / extra

   IPX addresses [14] are composed of a network, node and socket number.
   The IPX network number is a four-byte number, in network order and
   expressed in hexadecimal, that signifies an IPX subnet.  The node
   element represents a network interface card.  It is a six-byte
   number, expressed in hexadecimal, that is usually the same as the
   node ID of the interface card.  The socket element represents a
   specific service access point, given an IPX network and node.  IPX
   sockets are analogous to TCP/IP ports, and are not to be confused
   with Berkeley sockets.

   AppleTalk addresses [9] are composed of an object, type and zone.
   The object is a human readable string.  The type is an identifier,
   not intended for human readability.  The zone refers to the AppleTalk
   Zone name, which is also human readable.  The characters composing
   these names are drawn from the AppleAscii character set [7].  Thus,
   they do not equate to escaped ASCII or UTF-8 characters.  The
   characters "=" and "*" are reserved and may not be included in the
   names even in binary form.

   In cases besides the AppleTalk grammar, some characters must be
   escaped before use.  To escape any character, precede the two digits
   indicating its ASCII value by '%'.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 8

2.2. Service URL Semantics

The service scheme-specific information following the "service:" URL scheme identifier provides information necessary to access the service. As described in the previous subsection, the form of a service: URL is as follows: service: URL = "service:" service-type ":" site url-path where <site> has one of the following forms could refer to an <ipsite>, <ipxsite> or <atsite> if the service URL locates to an IP, IPX or AppleTalk service access point, respectively. As discussed in Section 1, the <service-type> can be either a concrete protocol name, or an abstract type name. The <ipsite> field is typically either a domain name (DNS) or an IP network protocol address for the service, and possibly a port number. Note that use of DNS hostnames is preferred for ease of renumbering. The <site> field can be null if other information in the service URL or service attributes is sufficient to use the service. The <sap> field allows more information to be provided (by way of <url-path> and <attr-list>) that can uniquely locate the service or resource if the <site> is not sufficient for that purpose. For IP addresses, the <site> field begins with "//". Other address families supported are IPX [14] and AppleTalk [9]. An <attr-list> field appears at the end of the <url-part> field, but is never required to exist in any service location registration. The <attr-list> field is composed of a list of semicolon (";") separated attribute assignments of the form: attr-id "=" attr-value or for keyword attributes: attr-id Attributes are part of service: URLs when the attributes are required to access a particular service. For instance, an ACAP [13] service might require that the client authenticate with it through Kerberos. Including an attribute in the service registration allows the ACAP client to make use of the correct SASL [11] authentication mechanism. The ACAP server's registration might look like: service:acap://;authentication=KERBEROSV4
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 9
   Note that there can be other attributes of an ACAP server which are
   not appropriate to include in the URL. For instance, the list of
   users who have access to the server is useful for selecting an ACAP
   server, but is not required for a client to use the registered

   Attributes associated with the service: URL are not typically
   included in the service: URL. They are stored and retrieved using
   other mechanisms.  The service: URL is uniquely identified with a
   particular service agent or resource, and is used when registering or
   requesting the attribute information.  The Service Location Protocol
   specifies how such information is registered by network services and
   obtained by client software.

2.3. Use of service: URLs

The service: URL is intended to allow arbitrary client/server and peer to peer systems to make use of a standardized dynamic service access point discovery mechanism. It is intended that service: URLs be selected according to the suitability of associated attributes. A client application can obtain the URLs of several services of the same type and distinguish the most preferable among them by means of their attributes. The client uses the service: URL to communicate directly to a service. Attributes are specified with a formal service template syntax described in Section 3. If a service: URL registration includes attributes, the registering agent SHOULD also keep track of the attributes which characterize the service. Registrations can be checked against the formal attribute specification defined in the template by the client or agent representing the client. Service registration are typically done using the Service Location Protocol [10] (SLP). SLP provides a mechanism for service: URLs to be obtained dynamically, according to the service's attributes. It is also possible to obtain service: URLs from documents and using other protocols. In this case, the URL may not be accompanied by the service attributes. The context in which the URL appears should make it clear, if possible, when the service is appropriate to use. For example, in a mail message, a service might be recommended for use when the user is in a branch office. Or, an HTML document might include a service: URL as a pointer to a service, describing in text what the service does and who is authorized to use it.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 10

2.4. Specifying the Service Type-Specific URL Syntax

When a service type is specified, the specification includes the definition of the syntax for all URLs that are registered by services of that particular type. For instance, the "lpr" service type may be defined with service: URLs in the following form: service:printer:lpr://<address of printer>/<queue name> The section of the URL after the address of the printer: "/" <queue name> is specific to the lpr service type and corresponds to the <url-path> field of the general service: URL syntax. This part is specified when the lpr service type is specified.

2.5. Accommodating Abstract Service Types

An abstract service type is a service type that can be implemented by a variety of different service agents. In order to register a service: URL for an abstract service type the 'abstract-type' grammar rule described in section 3.1 is used. This will result in a URL which includes enough information to use the service, namely, the protocol, address and path information. Unlike 'concrete' service: URLs, however, the service type is not enough to determine the service access. Rather, an abstract service type denotes a class of service types. The following subsection discusses this point in more detail. Concrete service templates inherit all attributes defined in the abstract service template from which the concrete service template was derived. Attribute defined in the abstract service template MUST not be defined in the concrete service template as well. This simplifies interpretation of templates. For example, if an abstract service template for service type ' Abstract' defines an attribute FOO, all concrete service templates derived from the abstract service template, such as ' Abstract:Concrete' will implicitly include the definition of attribute FOO. This derived template MUST NOT redefine FOO, according to the rule above. A further example is described in Section A.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 11

2.5.1. Advertising Abstract Service Types

Some services may make use of several protocols that are in common use and are distinct services in their own right. In these cases an abstract service type is appropriate. What is essential is that all the required information for the service is clearly defined. For example, suppose a network service is being developed for dynamically loading device drivers. The client requires the following three pieces of information before it can successfully load and instantiate the driver: 1. The protocol used to load the driver code, for example, "ftp", "http" or "tftp" 2. A pathname identifying where the driver code is located, for example "/systemhost/drivers/diskdrivers.drv", 3. The name of the driver, for example, "scsi". The temptation is to form the first two items into a URL and embed that into a service: URL. As an example which should be avoided, service:ftp:/;driver=scsi is a service: URL which seems to indicate where to obtain the driver. Rather, an abstract service-type SHOULD be used. The service type is not "ftp", as the example indicates. Rather, it is "device-drivers". The service: URL that should be used, consistent with the rules in section [6], is the following: service:device-drivers:; driver=scsi;platform=sys3.2-rs3000 Other URLs for the same service using other protocols are also supported, as in: service:device-drivers:t; driver=scsi;platform=sys3.2-rs3000 service:device-drivers:; driver=scsi;platform=sys3.2-rs3000 Using SLP, a search for the service type "device-drivers" may return all of the three URLs listed above. The client selects the most appropriate access protocol for the desired resource.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 12
   The fundamental requirement is that the abstract service type MUST be
   well specified.  This requirement is imposed so that program code or
   human users have enough information to access the service.  In every
   case, a well-specified abstract type will include either an access
   protocol and a network address where the service is available, or an
   embedded URL for a standardized URL scheme that describes how to
   access the service.  In the example above, there are three further
   requirements:  A URL path is included for access protocols indicating
   the document to download, and two attributes are included to
   characterize the driver.

3. Syntax and Semantics of Service Type Specifications

Service type specifications are documents in a formal syntax defining properties important to service registration. These properties are: 1. General information on the service type specification itself, 2. The syntax of the service type-specific part of the service URL, 3. The definition of attributes associated with a service. The service type specification document is the service type template. The following subsections describe the syntax and semantics of service type templates.

3.1. Syntax of Service Type Templates

Service template documents are encoded in a simple form. They may be translated into any language or character set, but the template used for standardization MUST be encoded in the 0x00-0x7F subrange of UTF-8 [16] (which corresponds to ASCII character encoding) and be in English. A template document begins with a block of text assigning values to five document identification items. The five identification items can appear in any order within the block, but conventionally the "template-type" item, which assigns the service type name, occurs at the very top of the document in order to provide context for the rest of the document. The attribute definition item occurs after the document identification items. All items end with a blank line. The reserved characters are ";", "%", "=", ",", "#", LF, and CR. Reserved characters MUST be escaped. The escape sequence is the same as described in [5].
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 13
   The service template is encoded in a UTF-8 character set, but
   submitted as a part of an work in progress, which is encoded in ASCII
   characters.  All characters which are outside of the ASCII range MUST
   be escaped using the `\' HEXDIG HEXDIG syntax.  For example, the
   letter e accent aigue would be represented as "\c3\a9".
   Unfortunately, this will detract from the readability of the service
   template in the service template submission.  Hopefully some public
   domain tools will emerge for translating escaped UTF-8 characters
   into humanly readable ones.

   Values in value lists are separated by commas.  A value list is
   terminated by a newline not preceded by a comma.  If the newline is
   preceded by a comma, the value list is interpreted to continue onto
   the next line.

   Attribute identifiers, attribute type names, and flags are all case
   insensitive.  For ease of presentation, upper and lower case
   characters can be used to represent these in the template document.
   Newlines are significant in the grammar.  They delimit one item from
   another, as well as separating parts of items internally.

   String values are considered to be a sequence of non-whitespace
   tokens potentially with embedded whitespace, separated from each
   other by whitespace.  Commas delimit lists of strings.  String values
   are trimmed so as to reduce any sequence of white space interior to a
   string to a single white space.  Preceding or trailing white space is
   removed.  For example:

         " some value , another example "

      is trimmed to

         "some value" and "another example".

   Note that there can be no ambiguity in string tokenization because
   values in value lists are separated by a comma.  String tokens are
   not delimited by double quotes (") as is usually the case with
   programming languages.

   Attribute tags and values are useful for directory look-up.  In this
   case, decoding of character escapes and trimming white space MUST be
   performed before string matching.  In addition, string matching
   SHOULD be case insensitive.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 14
   Templates obey the following ABNF [8] grammar:

      template      =  tem-attrs attr-defs
      tem-attrs     =  schemetype schemevers schemetext schemeurl
      schemetype    =  "template-type=" scheme term
      schemevers    =  "template-version=" version-no term
      schemetext    =  "template-description=" newline desc term
      schemeurl     =  "template-url-syntax=" newline url-bnf term
      url-bnf       =  *[ com-chars ]
                       ; An ABNF describing the <url-path> production
                       ; in the service: URL grammar of Section 2.1.
      scheme        =  service-type [ "." naming-auth ]
      service-type  =  scheme-name
      naming-auth   =  scheme-name
      scheme-name   =  ALPHA [1*schemechar] [ "." 1*schemechar ]
      schemechar    =  ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "+" /
      version-no    =  1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT
      langtag       =  1*8ALPHA ["-" 1*8ALPHA]
                       ; See [3]
      desc          =  *[ com-chars ]
                       ; A block of free-form text for reading by
                       ; people describing the service in a short,
                       ; informative manner.
      term          =  newline newline
      attr-defs     =  *( attr-def / keydef )
      attr-def      =  id "=" attrtail
      keydef        =  id "=" "keyword" newline [help-text] newline
      attrtail      =  type flags newline [value-list] [help-text]
                       [value-list] newline
      id            =  1*attrchar
      type          =  "string" / "integer" / "boolean" / "opaque"
      flags         =  ["m"/"M"] ["l"/"L"] ["o"/"O"] ["x"/"X"]
      value-list    =  value newline / value "," value-list /
                       value "," newline value-list
      help-text     =  1*( "#" help-line )
                       ; A block of free-form text for reading by
                       ; people describing the attribute and
                       ; its values.
      help-line     =  *[ com-chars ] newline
      attrchar      =  schemechar / ":" / "_" / "$" / "~" / "@" / "." /
                       "|" / "<" / ">" / "*" / "&"
      value         =  string / integer / boolean / opaque
      string        =  safe-char *[safe-char / white-sp] safe-char
      integer       =  [ "+" | "-" ] 1*DIGIT
      boolean       =  "true" / "false"
      opaque        =  "\FF" 1*( "\" HEXDIG HEXDIG)
                       ; Each byte of opaque value is hex encoded.
                       ; The format corresponds to [10].
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 15
                       ; Newlines are ignored in decoding opaque
                       ; values.
      com-chars     =  safe-char / white-sp / "," / ";"/ "%"
      safe-char     =  attrchar / escaped / " " / "!" / '"' / "'" /
                       "|" / "(" / ")" / "+" / "-" / "." / ":" /
                       "=" / "?" / "[" / "]" / "{" / "/" / "{" /
                       ; All UTF-8 printable characters are
                       ; included except ",", "%", ";", and "#".
      escaped       =  1*(`\' HEXDIG HEXDIG)
      white-sp      =  SPACE / HT
      newline       =  CR / ( CR LF )

3.2. Semantics of Service Type Templates

The service type template defines the service attributes and service: URL syntax for a particular service type. The attribute definition includes the attribute type, default values, allowed values and other information. Note that the 'template-type', 'template-version', 'template- description' and 'template-url-syntax' have all been defined as attributes. These attributes MAY accompany any service registration using SLPv2.

3.2.1. Definition of a Service Template

There are four items included in the service template. The semantics of each item is summarized below. - template-type The scheme name of the service scheme. The scheme name consists of the service type name and an optional naming authority name, separated from the service type name by a period. See 3.2.2 for the conventions governing service type names. - template-version The version number of the service type specification. - template-description A description of the service suitable for inclusion in text read by people.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 16
    -  template-url-syntax

       The syntax of the service type-specific URL part of the service:

    -  attribute definitions

       A collection of zero or more definitions for attributes
       associated with the service in service registrations.

   Each of the following subsections deals with one of these items.

3.2.2. Service Type

The service scheme consists of the service type name and an optional naming authority name separated from the service type name by a period. The service scheme is a string that is appended to the ' service:' URL scheme identifier, and is the value of the "template- type" item in the template document. If the naming authority name is absent it is assumed to be IANA.

3.2.3. Version Number

The version number of the service type template is the value of the "template-version" item. A draft proposal starts at 0.0, and the minor number increments once per revision. A standardized template starts at 1.0. Additions of optional attributes add one to the minor number, and additions of required attributes, changes of definition, or removal of attributes add one to the major number. The intent is that an old service template still accurately, if incompletely, defines the attributes of a service registration if the template only differs from the registration in its minor version. See Section 4 for more detail on how to use the template-version attribute.

3.2.4. Description

The description is a block of text readable by people in the language of the template and is the value of the "template-description" item. It should be sufficient to identify the service to human readers and provide a short, informative description of what the service does. If the service type corresponds to a particular protocol, the protocol specification must be cited here. The protocol need not be a standardized protocol. The template might refer to a proprietary specification, and refer the reader of the template to a contact person for further information.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 17

3.2.5. Syntax of the Service Type-specific URL Part

The syntax of the service type-specific part of the service: URL is provided in the template document as the value of the "template-url- syntax" item. The <url-path> field of the service: URL is designed to provide additional information to locate a service when the <addr-spec> field is not sufficient. The <url-path> field distinguishes URLs of a particular service type from those of another service type. For instance, in the case of the lpr service type, the <url-path> may be defined so that it must include the queue name, but other service types may not require this information. The syntax for the <url-path> field MUST accompany the definition of a new service type, unless the URL scheme has already been standardized and is not a service: URL. The syntax is included in the template document as an ABNF [8] following the rules for URL syntax described in [5]. There is no requirement for a service scheme to support a <url-path>. The <url-path> field can be very simple, or even omitted. If the URL scheme has already been standardized, the "template-url-syntax" item SHOULD include a reference to the appropriate standardization documents. Abstract service types may defer this field to the template documents describing their concrete instances.

3.2.6. Attribute Definition

The bulk of the template is typically devoted to defining service type-specific attributes. An attribute definition precisely specifies the attribute's type, other restrictions on the attribute (whether it is multi-valued, optional, etc), some text readable by people describing the attribute, and lists of default and allowed values. The only required information is the attribute's type, the rest are optional. Registration, deregistration and the use of attributes in queries can be accomplished using the Service Location Protocol [10] or other means, and discussion of this is beyond the scope of the document. Attributes are used to convey information about a given service for purposes of differentiating different services of the same type. They convey information to be used in the selection of a particular service to establish communicate with, either through a program offering a human interface or programmatically. Attributes can be encoded in different character sets and in different languages. The procedure for doing this is described in Section 6. An attribute definition begins with the specification of the attribute's identifier and ends with a single empty line. Attributes definitions have five components (in order of appearance in a
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 18

    1. An attribute identifier which acts as the name of the attribute,

    2. Attribute descriptors (type and flags),

    3. An optional list of values which are assigned to the attribute by

    4. An optional block of text readable by people providing a short,
       informative description of the attribute,

    5. An optional list of allowed values which restrict the value or
       values the attribute can take on. The Attribute Identifier
An attribute definition starts with the specification of the attribute's identifier. The attribute's identifier functions as the name of the attribute. Note that the characters used to compose an attribute identifier are restricted to those characters considered unrestricted for inclusion in a URL according to [5]. The reason is that services can display prominent attributes in their service: URL registrations. Each attribute identifier must be unique in the template. Since identifiers are case folded, upper case and lower case characters are the same. The Attribute Type
Attributes can have one of five different types: string, integer, boolean, opaque, or keyword. The attribute's type specification is separated from the attribute's identifier by an equal sign ("=") and follows the equal sign on the same line. The string, signed integer, and boolean types have the standard programming language or database semantics. Integers are restricted to those signed values that can be represented in 32 bits. The character set used to represent strings is not specified at the time the template is defined, but rather is determined by the service registration. Booleans have the standard syntax. Opaques are byte escaped values that can be used to represent any other kind of data. Keywords are attributes that have no characteristics other than their existence (and possibly the descriptive text in their definition). Keyword and boolean attributes impose restrictions on the following parts of the attribute definition. Keyword attribute definitions MUST have no flag information following the type definition, nor any default or allowed values list. Boolean attributes are single value only, i.e., multi-valued boolean attributes are not allowed.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 19 Attribute Flags
Flags determine other characteristics of an attribute. With the exception of keyword attributes, which may not have any flags, flags follow the attribute type on the same line as the attribute identifier, and are separated from each other by whitespace. Flags may appear in any order after the attribute type. Other information must not follow the flags, and only one flag identifier of a particular flag type is allowed per attribute definition. The semantics of the flags are as follows: - o or O Indicates that the attribute is optional. If this flag is missing, the attribute is required in every service registration. - m or M Indicates that the attribute can take on multiple values. If this flag is present, every value in a multi-valued attribute has the same type as the type specified in the type part of the attribute definition. Boolean attributes must not include this flag. - l or L Indicates that attribute is literal, i.e. is not meant to be translated into other languages. If this flag is present, the attribute is not considered to be readable by people and should not be translated when the template is translated. See Section 6 for more information about translation. - x or X Indicates that clients SHOULD include the indicated attribute in requests for services. Neglecting to include this attribute will not sufficiently differentiate the service. If services are obtained without selecting this attribute they will quite likely be useless to the client. The values for multivalued attributes are an unordered set. Deletions of individual values from a multivalued attribute are not supported, and deletion of the attribute causes the entire set of values to be removed.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 20 Default Value or List
If the attribute definition includes a default value or, in the case of multivalued attributes, a default values list, it begins on the second line of the attribute definition and continues over the following lines until a line ends without a comma. As a consequence, newlines cannot be embedded in values unless escaped. See Section 2.1. Particular attribute types and definitions restrict the default values list. Keyword attributes must not have a list of defaults. If an optional attribute's definition has an allowed values list, then a default value or list is not optional but required. The motivation for this is that defining an attribute with an allowed values list is meant to restrict the values the attribute can take on, and requiring a default value or list assures that the default value is a member of the given set of allowed values. The default value or list indicates what values the attribute is given if no values are assigned to the attribute when a service is registered. If an optional attribute's definition includes no default value or list, the following defaults are assigned: 1. String values are assigned the empty string, 2. Integer values are assigned zero, 3. Boolean values are assigned false, 4. Opaque values are assigned a byte array containing no values, 5. Multi-valued attributes are initialized with a single value. For purposes of translating nonliteral attributes, the default values list is taken to be an ordered set, and translations MUST maintain that order. Descriptive Text
Immediately after the default values list, if any, a block of descriptive text SHOULD be included in the attribute definition. This text is meant to be readable by people, and should include a short, informative description of the attribute. It may also provide additional information, such as a description of the allowed values. This text is primarily designed for display by interactive browsing tools. The descriptive text is set off from the surrounding definition by a crosshatch character ("#") at the beginning of the line. The text should not, however, be treated as a comment by
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 21
   parsing and other tools, since it is an integral part of the
   attribute definition.  Within the block of descriptive text, the text
   is transferred verbatim, including indentation and line breaks, so
   any formatting is preserved. Allowed Values List
Finally, the attribute definition concludes with an optional allowed values list. The allowed values list, if any, follows the descriptive text, or, if the descriptive text is absent, the initial values list. The syntax of the allowed values list is identical to that of the initial values list. The allowed values list is also terminated by a line that does not end in a comma. If the allowed values list is present, assignment to attributes is restricted to members of the list. As with the default values list, the allowed values list is also considered to be an ordered set for purposes of translation. Conclusion of An Attribute Definition
An attribute definition concludes with a single empty line.

4. A Process For Standardizing New Service Types

New service types can be suggested simply by providing a service type template and a short description about how to use the service. The template MUST have its "template-version" template attribute set to 0.0. MAJOR revision numbers come before the '.', MINOR revision numbers come after the '.'. The minor version number increments once with each change until it achieves 1.0. There is no guarantee any version of the service template is backward compatible before it reaches 1.0. Once a service template has reached 1.0, the definition is "frozen" for that version. New templates must be defined, of course, to refine that definition, but the following rules must be followed: A MINOR revision number signifies the introduction of a compatible change. A MAJOR revision number signifies the introduction of an incompatible change. This is formalized by the following rules: - Any new optional attribute defined for the template increases the minor version number by one. All other attributes for the version must continue to be supported as before. A client which
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 22
       supports 1.x can still use later versions of 1.y (where x<y) as
       it ignores attributes it doesn't know about.

    -  Adding a required attribute, removing support for an attribute
       or changing definition of an attribute requires changing the
       major version number of a service template.  A client application
       may be unable to make use of this information, or it may need
       to obtain the most recent service template to help the user
       interpret the service information.

   The template is submitted to a special mailing list, see section 5.
   This document must include a 'template begins here' and 'template
   ends here' marking, in text, so that it is trivial to cut and paste
   the template from the submission.

   The list will be available at  Ideally, experts
   in the implementation and deployment of the particular protocol are
   consulted so as to add or delete attributes or change their
   definition to make the template as useful as possible.  The mailing
   list will be maintained even when the SVRLOC WG goes dormant for the
   purpose of discussing service templates.

   All published versions of the template must be available on-line,
   including obsolete ones.

   Once consensus is achieved, the template should be reissued with
   possible corrections, having its Version number set to 1.0.
   Templates with version numbers below 1.0 are not submitted to the
   IANA. From that point onwards, templates are submitted.  See Section
   5 for details on how templates are submitted to an IANA registry of

5. IANA Considerations

It is the responsibility of the IESG (e.g., Applications Area director) to appoint a Designated Expert (see [12].) Anyone may ask for clarification of a service template. This is to solicit input from the concerned community. It is up to the appointed reviewer to determine whether clarification requests are satisfied. It is the reviewer's responsibility to see that all reasonable clarification requests are met before the template is submitted for inclusion in the IANA registry. When the reviewer has determined that the template submission is ready, he or she will submit the template to the IANA for inclusion in a registry. Mailing list participants supply input to the process but do not make the decision whether to accept a service template.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 23
   If a dispute arises over the decisions made by the reviewer, the
   matter may be appealed according to normal IETF procedure as
   described for the Standards Track process.

   The IANA will maintain a mail forwarding alias for the work of this
   list, so that "" points to a mail server supplied
   by a volunteer organization.

   The service template submission MUST be of the form:

      Name of submitter:
      Language of service template:
      Security Considerations:
      Template Text:
      ----------------------template begins here-----------------------
                                    . . .
      -----------------------template ends here------------------------

   The service template file has a naming convention:

   <service-type> "." <version-no> "." <langtag>

   Each of these fields are defined in Section 2.  They correspond to
   the values of the template fields "type", "template-version".  The
   files for the example templates in this document (see Section A) are

       "" and

   The reviewer will ensure that the template submission to IANA has the
   correct form and required fields.

   No service type template will be accepted for inclusion in the
   service template registry unless the submission includes a security
   considerations section and contact information for the template
   document author.

   The IANA will maintain a registry containing both the service type
   templates, and the template description document containing the
   service type template, including all previous versions.  The IANA
   will receive notice to include a service template in the registry
   by email from the reviewer.  This message will include the service
   template itself, which is to be registered.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 24
   Neither the reviewer nor the IANA will take any position on claims of
   copyright or trademark issues with regard to templates.

6. Internationalization Considerations

The service: URL must be encoded using the rules set forth in [5]. The character set encoding is limited to specific ranges within the US-ASCII character set [4]. The template is encoded in UTF-8 characters.

6.1. Language Identification and Translation

The language used in attribute strings should be identified supplying a Language Tag [3] in the Service Template submission (see Section 5). A program can translate a service registration from one language to another provided it has both the template of the language for the registration and the template of the desired target language. All standardized attributes are in the same order in both templates. All non-arbitrary strings, including the descriptive help text, is directly translatable from one language to another. Non-literal attribute definitions, attribute identifiers, attribute type names, attribute flags, and the boolean constants "true" and "false" are never translated. Translation of attribute identifiers is prohibited because, as with domain names, they can potentially be part of a service: URL and therefore their character set is restricted. In addition, as with variable identifiers in programming languages, they could become embedded into program code. All strings used in attribute values are assumed translatable unless explicitly defined as being literal, so that best effort translation (see below) does not modify strings which are meant to be interpreted by a program, not a person. An example of a translated service template is included in Section A. There are two ways to go about translation: standardization and best effort. When the service type is standardized, more than one document can be submitted for review. One service type description is approved as a master, so that when a service type template is updated in one language, all the translations (at least eventually) reflect the same semantics.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 25
   If no document exists describing the standard translation of the
   service type, a 'best effort' translation for strings should be done.

7. Security Considerations

Service type templates provide information that is used to interpret information obtained by the Service Location Protocol. If these templates are modified or false templates are distributed, services may not correctly register themselves, or clients might not be able to interpret service information. The service: URLs themselves specify the service access point and protocol for a particular service type. These service: URLs could be distributed and indicate the location of a service other than that normally want to used. The Service Location Protocol [10] distributes service: URLs and has an authentication mechanism that allows service: URLs of registered services to be signed and for the signatures to be verified by clients. Each Service Template will include a security considerations section which will describe security issues with using the service scheme for the specific Service Type.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 26

A. Service Template Examples

The text in the template example sections is to be taken as being a single file. They are completely fictitious (ie. the examples do not represent real services). The FOO example shows how to use service templates for an application that has very few attributes. Clients request the FOO server where their user data is located by including their user name as the value of the user attribute. The Net-Transducer example shows how abstract service types are defined and how a corresponding concrete instance is defined. A system might support any of several NetTransducer services. Here we give only one concrete instance of the abstract type. It is not necessary to register concrete templates for an abstract service type if the abstract service type template is completely clear as to what possible values can be used as a concrete type, and what their interpretation is.

A.1. FOO

The FOO service template submission example follows: Name of submitter: "Erik Guttman" <> Language of service template: en Security Considerations: If the USER and GROUPS attributes are included a possibility exists that the list of identities for users or groups can be discovered. This information would otherwise be difficult to discover. Template Text: -------------------------template begins here----------------------- template-type=FOO template-version=0.0 template-description= The FOO service URL provides the location of an FOO service. template-url-syntax= url-path= ; There is no URL path defined for a FOO URL. users= string M L O # The list of all users which the FOO server supports.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 27
  groups= string M L O
  # The list of all groups which the FOO server supports.
  --------------------------template ends here------------------------

   This template could be internationalized by registering another
   version, say in German:

  Name of submitter: "Erik Guttman" <>
  Language of service template: de
  Security Considerations:
    Wenn die USER und GROUPS Eigenschaften inbegriffen sind,
    besteht die Moeglichkeit, dass die Liste der Identitaeten
    von Benutzern oder Gruppen endeckt werden kann.  Diese
    Information wurde unter anderen Umstaenden schwierig zu
    entdecken sein.

  Template Text:
  -------------------------template begins here-----------------------


    Der FOO Service URL zeigt die Stelle von einem Foo Service an.

    url-path= ; Es gibt keinen fuer den FOO URL definierten Pfad.

  users= string M L O
  # Die Liste aller Users, die der FOO Server unterstuetzt.

  groups= string M L O
  # Die Liste aller Gruppen, die der FOO Server unterstuetzt.
  --------------------------template ends here------------------------

   Note that the attribute tags are not translated.  If translations
   are desired, the suggested convention for doing so is to define a
   separate attribute called localize-<tag> for each attribute tag which
   is to be localized.  This will aid in displaying the attribute tags
   in a human interface.

   For example, in this case above, the following two attributes could
   be defined:

  localize-users= string

  localize-groups= string
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 28

   The attributes (in SLPv2 attribute list format) for a service
   registration of a FOO service based on this template, in German,
   could be:

    Der FOO Service URL zeigt die Stelle von einem Foo Service an.),
  (template-url-syntax= \OD url-path= ; Es gibt kein fuer den FOO
   URL definiert Pfad. \OD),(localize-users=Benutzer),

   Anyone obtaining these attributes could display "Benutzer=Hans,Fritz"
   in a human interface using the included information.  Note that the
   template attributes have been included in this registration.  This is
   OPTIONAL, but makes it possible to discover which template was used
   to register the service.

A.2. Abstract Service Type: Net-Transducer

An example submission of an abstract service type template is: Name of submitter: "Erik Guttman" <> Language of service template: en Security Considerations: See the security considerations of the concrete service types. Template Text: -------------------------template begins here----------------------- template-type=Net-Transducer template-version=0.0 template-description= This is an abstract service type. The purpose of the Net- Transducer service type is to organize into a single category all network enabled Transducers which have certain properties. template-url-syntax= url-path= ; Depends on the concrete service type. ; See these templates. sample-units= string L # The units of sample that the Transducer provides, for instance # C (degrees Celsius), V (Volts), kg (Kilograms), etc. sample-resolution= string L
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 29
  # The resolution of the Transducer.  For instance, 10^-3 means
  # that the Transducer has resolution to 0.001 unit.

  sample-rate= integer L
  # The speed at which samples are obtained per second.  For
  # instance 1000 means that one sample is obtained every millisecond.

  --------------------------template ends here------------------------

A.3. Concrete Service Type: Net-Transducer:Thermometer

This is another service template submission example, supplying a concrete service type corresponding to the abstract template above. Name of submitter: "Erik Guttman" <> Language of service template: en Security Considerations: There is no authentication of the Transducer output. Thus, the Thermometer output could easily be spoofed. Template Text: -------------------------template begins here----------------------- template-type=service:Net-Transducer:Thermometer template-version=0.0 template-description= The Thermometer is a Net-Transducer capable of reading temperature. The data is read by opening a TCP connection to one of the ports in the service URL and reading an ASCII string until an NULL character is encountered. The client may continue reading data at no faster than the sample-rate, or close the connection. template-url-syntax= url-path = "ports=" ports-list port-list = port / port "," ports port = 1*DIGIT ; See the Service URL <port> production rule. ; These are the ports connections can be made on. location-description=string # The location where the Thermometer is located. operator=string O # The operator to contact to have the Thermometer serviced. --------------------------template ends here------------------------
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 30

A.4. service: URLs and SLP

A user with an FOO enabled calendar application should not be bothered with knowing the address of their FOO server. The calendar client program can use SLP to obtain the FOO service: URL automatically, say 'service:foo://', by issuing a Service Request. In the event that this FOO server failed, the Calendar client can issue the same service request again to find the backup FOO server, say 'service:foo://'. In both cases, the service: URL conforms to the FOO service template as do the associated attributes (user and group.) A network thermometer based on the above template could be advertised with the SLPv2 attribute list: URL = service:net-transducer:thermometer://v33.test/ports=3211 Attributes = (location-description=Missile bay 32), (operator=Joe Agent), (sample-units=C), (sample-resolution=10^-1),(sample-rate=10), (template-type=service:net-transducer:thermometer), (template-version=0.0),(template-description= The Thermometer is a Net-Transducer capable of reading temperature. The data is read by opening a TCP connection to one of the ports in the service URL and reading an ASCII string until an NULL character is encountered. The client may continue reading data at no faster than the sample-rate, or close the connection.), (template-url-syntax= \0D "ports=" port-list \OD port-list = port / port "," ports \OD port = 1*DIGIT \OD ; See the Service URL <port> production rule. \OD ; These are the ports connections can be made on.\OD) This might be very useful for a technician who wanted to find a Thermometers in Missile bay 32, for example. Note that the template attributes are advertised. The template-url-syntax value requires explicit escaped CR characters so that the ABNF syntax is correct.

B. Acknowledgments

Thanks to Michael Day and Leland Wallace for assisting with the IPX and AppleTalk address syntax portions. Ryan Moats provided valuable feedback throughout the writing of this document.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 31

C. References

[1] Protocol and service names, October 1994. [2] Port numbers, July 1997. [3] Alvestrand, H., "Tags for the Identification of Languages", RFC 1766, March 1995. [4] ANSI. Coded Character Set -- 7-bit American Standard code for Information Interchange. X3.4-1986, 1986. [5] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, August 1998. [6] Bradner, S., "Key Words for Use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [7] Apple Computer. Inside Macintosh. Addison-Wesley, 1993. [8] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997. [9] S. Gursharan, R. Andrews, and A. Oppenheimer. Inside AppleTalk. Addison-Wesley, 1990. [10] Guttman, E., Perkins, C., Veizades, J. and M. Day, "Service Location Protocol Version 2", RFC 2608, June 1999. [11] Myers, J., "Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL)", RFC 2222, October 1997. [12] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs, BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998 [13] Newman C. and J. Myers, "ACAP -- Application Configuration Access Protocol", RFC 2244, November 1997. [14] Inc Novell. IPX RIP and SAP Router Specification. Part Number 107-000029-001, Version 1.30, May 1996. [15] Veizades, J., Guttman, E., Perkins, C. and S. Kaplan, "Service Location Protocol", RFC 2165, July 1997.
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 32
   [16] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646",
        RFC 2279, January 1998.

D. Authors' Addresses

Questions about this memo can be directed to: Erik Guttman Sun Microsystems Bahnstr. 2 74915 Waibstadt Germany Phone: +49 7263 911484 Fax: +1 650 786 5992 EMail: Charles E. Perkins Sun Microsystems 15 Network Circle Menlo Park, CA 94303 USA Phone: +1 650 786 6464 Fas: +1 650 786 6445 EMail: James Kempf Sun Microsystems 15 Network Circle Menlo Park, CA 94303 USA Phone: +1 650 786 5890 Fax: +1 650 786 6445 EMail:
Top   ToC   RFC2609 - Page 33

E. Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE." Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.