Content for TR 25.766 Word version: 13.1.0
5 Target scenarios
6 Evaluation methodologies
7 Study areas
8 Impact on legacy terminals
9 Impact on specifications
10 Conclusions
A Performance evaluation methodology
$ Change History
5 Target scenarios p. 8
6 Evaluation methodologies p. 9
6.1 Assumptions on receiver architectures p. 9
6.1.1 Pre-decoding IC receiver p. 9
6.1.2 Post-decoding IC receiver p. 10
6.1.3 Type 3i receiver p. 10
6.2 Evaluations in HetNet scenario p. 11
6.3 Evaluations in HomoNet scenario p. 11
7 Study areas p. 13
7.1 Parameters to support UE with ICS capability p. 13
7.1.1 Signalling of the parameters to assist pre-decoding IC UE p. 13
7.1.2 Signaling for network assisted interference cancellation p. 14
7.2 CQI mismatch issue p. 15
7.2.1 Performance of ICS UE without CQI mismatch p. 15
7.2.1.1 Evaluation methodology p. 15
7.2.1.1.1 Triple radio-link simulation to model the serving and interferer links p. 16
7.2.1.1.2 Methodology for comparing performance with/without CQI mismatch p. 16
7.2.1.1.3 Methodology for evaluations on CQI mismatch for MIMO interferer p. 18
7.2.1.2 Simulation results p. 18
7.2.2 A solution for CQI mismatch issue p. 22
7.3 Offloading enhancements p. 24
7.3.1 Evaluation p. 24
7.3.1.1 Simulation modeling p. 24
7.3.1.2 HetNet scenario p. 25
7.3.1.3 HomoNet scenario p. 27
7.3.1.4 Observations p. 29
7.3.1.5 Other factors to be considered p. 29
7.3.2 Solutions for offloading enhancements p. 29
7.3.2.1 Solution 1 p. 29
7.3.2.1.1 Activation and deactivation of the SINR measurements p. 30
7.3.2.1.2 Evaluation results p. 31
7.3.2.1.3 Summary p. 32
7.3.2.2 Solution 2 p. 33
7.3.2.3 Solution 3 p. 34
7.3.2.3.1 Enhanced offloading based on non-MF capable NodeBs p. 35
7.3.2.3.2 Potential optimizations at the UE side p. 36
7.3.2.4 Required signaling for offloading p. 36
7.3.3 Summary on the enhanced offloading solutions p. 37
8 Impact on legacy terminals p. 37
8.1 Parameters to support UE with NAICS capability p. 37
8.2 Mechanisms for offloading p. 38
8.3 Solutions to mitigate CQI mismatch issue p. 38
9 Impact on specifications p. 38
10 Conclusions p. 39
A Performance evaluation methodology p. 41
$ Change History p. 45
