Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
959493929190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 8602

Update to the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) IANA Registry Rules regarding Postal Addresses

Pages: 3
Proposed Standard
Updates:  3219

Top   ToC   RFC8602 - Page 1
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          J. Arkko
Request for Comments: 8602                                      Ericsson
Updates: 3219                                                  T. Hardie
Category: Standards Track                                      July 2019
ISSN: 2070-1721


   Update to the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) IANA Registry Rules
                       regarding Postal Addresses

Abstract

This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses be included in contact information. This memo updates RFC 3219. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8602. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Top   ToC   RFC8602 - Page 2

Table of Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1. Introduction

This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses be included in contact information. No use for the addresses is identified, and omitting this information provides a privacy benefit. This memo updates RFC 3219.

2. IANA Considerations

This memo updates the registration rules [RFC8126] for TRIP Attributes ([RFC3219], Section 13.2) and TRIP IP Telephony Administrative Domain (ITAD) Numbers ([RFC3219], Section 13.5) as follows. The IETF no longer requires IANA to collect postal address information when adding TRIP registry entries. Additionally, IANA has removed previously collected postal addresses from the registries.

3. Security Considerations

No security impacts of this change have been identified.

4. Normative References

[RFC3219] Rosenberg, J., Salama, H., and M. Squire, "Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP)", RFC 3219, DOI 10.17487/RFC3219, January 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3219>. [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
Top   ToC   RFC8602 - Page 3

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Michelle Cotton, Alissa Cooper, and Jonathan Rosenberg for interesting discussions in this problem space. The authors would also like to thank Carlos Pignataro, Russ Housley, Abdussalam Baryun, and Paul Wouters for feedback.

Authors' Addresses

Jari Arkko Ericsson Kauniainen 02700 Finland Email: jari.arkko@piuha.net Ted Hardie Email: ted.ietf@gmail.com