Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETF RFCsSIP
929190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 8458

Using National Bibliography Numbers as Uniform Resource Names

Pages: 18
Informational
Obsoletes:  3188

Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 1
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         J. Hakala
Request for Comments: 8458               The National Library of Finland
Obsoletes: 3188                                             October 2018
Category: Informational
ISSN: 2070-1721


     Using National Bibliography Numbers as Uniform Resource Names

Abstract

National Bibliography Numbers (NBNs) are used by national libraries and other organizations in order to identify resources in their collections. NBNs are usually applied to resources that are not catered for by established (standard) identifier systems such as International Standard Book Number (ISBN). A Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace for NBNs was established in 2001 in RFC 3188. Since then, a number of European national libraries have implemented URN:NBN-based systems. This document replaces RFC 3188 and defines how NBNs can be supported within the updated URN framework. A revised namespace registration (version 4) compliant to RFC 8141 is included. Status of This Memo This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents approved by the IESG are candidates for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8458.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 2
Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents

   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Fundamental Namespace and Community Considerations for NBN . 5 3.1. The URN:NBN Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. Community Considerations for NBNs . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. National Bibliography Number URNs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.1. Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.2. Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.2.1. Usage of r-component and q-component . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.2. Usage of f-component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.3. Encoding Considerations and Lexical Equivalence . . . . . 10 4.4. Resolution and Persistence of NBN-based URNs . . . . . . 12 4.5. Additional Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5. URN Namespace ID (NID) Registration for the National Bibliography Number (NBN) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Appendix A. Significant Changes from RFC 3188 . . . . . . . . . 18 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 3

1. Introduction

One of the basic permanent Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes (cf. [RFC3986] and [IANA-URI]) is Uniform Resource Name (URN). URNs were originally defined in RFC 2141 [RFC2141]. In 2017, a revision was adopted with new definitions and registration procedures [RFC8141]. Any traditional identifier, when used within the URN system, must have a namespace of its own that is registered with IANA [IANA-URN]. National Bibliography Number (NBN) is one such namespace, specified in 2001 in RFC 3188 [RFC3188]. This document describes the syntax and usage of NBN URNs and updates the registration of the associated URN namespace. This document additionally describes certain policy assumptions about how national libraries and their partner organizations partition, delegate, and manage the namespace. Violation of those assumptions could impact the utility of the NBN URN namespace. URN:NBNs are in production use in several European countries including (in alphabetical order) Austria, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. The URN:NBN namespace is collectively managed by these national libraries. URN: NBNs have been applied to diverse content including Web archives, digitized materials, research data, and doctoral dissertations. They can be used by national libraries and organizations cooperating with them. As a part of the initial development of the URN system in the late 1990s, the IETF URN Working Group agreed that it was important to demonstrate that the URN syntax can accommodate existing identifier systems. RFC 2288 [RFC2288] investigated the feasibility of using ISBN, ISSN, and SICI (Serial Item and Contribution Identifier) as URNs, with positive results; however, it did not formally register corresponding URN namespaces. (For further discussion of how these systems have evolved as URNs, see RFC 8254 [RFC8254].) This was in part due to the still-evolving process to formalize criteria for namespace definition documents and registration. The criteria were consolidated later in the IETF, first in RFC 2611 [RFC2611], then RFC 3406 [RFC3406], and now RFC 8141 [RFC8141]. URN namespaces have been registered for NBN, ISBN, and ISSN in RFCs 3188 [RFC3188], 3187 [RFC3187], and 3044 [RFC3044], respectively. ISBN and ISSN namespaces were made compliant with RFC 8141 [RFC8141] in 2017 by publishing revised ISSN [ISSN-namespace] and ISBN [ISBN-namespace] namespace registrations.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 4
   The term "National Bibliography Number" encompasses persistent local
   identifier systems that national libraries and their partner
   organizations use in addition to the more formally (and
   internationally) established identifiers.  These partner
   organizations include universities and their libraries and other
   subsidiaries, other research institutions, plus governmental and
   public organizations.  Some national libraries maintain a significant
   number of these liaison relationships; for instance, the German
   National Library had almost 400 by early 2018 [NBN-Resolving].

   In practice, NBN differs from standard identifier systems such as
   ISBN and ISSN because it is not a single identifier system with
   standard-specified scope and syntax.  Each NBN implementer creates
   its own system with its own syntax and assignment rules.  Each user
   organization is also obliged to keep track of how NBNs are being
   used; however, within the generic framework set in this document,
   local NBN assignment policies may vary considerably.

   Historically, NBNs have been applied in the national bibliographies
   to identify the resources catalogued into them.  Prior to the
   emergence of bibliographic standard identifiers in the early 1970s,
   national libraries assigned NBNs to all catalogued publications.

   Since the late 1990s, the NBN scope has been extended to cover a vast
   range of resources, both originally digital and digitized.  Only a
   small subset of these resources is catalogued in the national
   bibliographies or other bibliographic databases.  Digitized resources
   and their component parts (such as still images in books or journal
   articles) are examples of resources that may get NBNs.

   It is possible to extend the scope of the NBN much further.  The
   National Library of Finland is using them in the Finnish National
   Ontology Service Finto to identify corporate names (see
   <http://finto.fi/cn/en/>).  Using NBNs to identify metadata elements
   provides a stable basis for creation of linked data.

   Simple guidelines for using NBNs as URNs and the original namespace
   registration were published in RFC 3188 [RFC3188].  The RFC at hand
   replaces RFC 3188; sections discussing the methods by which URN:NBNs
   should be resolved have been updated, unused features have been
   eliminated, and the text is compliant with the stipulations of the
   revised URN specification [RFC8141].
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 5

2. Conventions Used in This Document

"NBN" refers to any National Bibliography Number identifier system used by the national libraries (or equivalent organizations) and other institutions, which use these identifiers with national libraries' support and permission. In this memo, "URN:NBN" is used as a shorthand for "NBN-based URN". The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Fundamental Namespace and Community Considerations for NBN

3.1. The URN:NBN Namespace

NBNs are widely used to identify both hand-held and digital resources in the collections of national libraries and other institutions that are responsible for preserving the cultural heritage of their constituents. Resources in these collections are usually preserved for a long time (i.e., for centuries). While the preferred methods for digital preservation may vary over time and depend on the content, the favorite one has been migration. Whenever necessary, a resource in an outdated file format is migrated into a more modern file format. To the extent possible, all old versions of the resource are also kept in order to alleviate the negative effects of partially successful migrations and the gradual loss of original look and feel that may accompany even fully successful migrations. When NBN is used to identify manifestations and there are many of them for a single work, local policy can require that each manifestation ought to have its own NBN. NBNs are typically used to identify objects for which standard identifiers such as ISBN are not applicable. However, NBNs can be used for component resources even when the resource as a whole qualifies for a standard identifier. For instance, if a digitized book has an ISBN, JPEG image files of its pages might be assigned NBNs. These URN:NBNs can be used as persistent links to the pages. The scope of standard identifier systems such as ISBN and ISSN is limited; they are applicable only to certain kinds of resources. One of the roles of the NBN is to fill in the gaps left by the standard identifiers. Collectively, these identifiers and NBNs cover all resources that national libraries and their partners need to include in their collections.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 6
   Section 4 below, and particularly Section 4.1, present a more
   detailed overview of the structure of the NBN namespace, related
   institutions, and the identifier assignment principles used.

3.2. Community Considerations for NBNs

National libraries are the key organizations providing persistent URN resolution services for resources identified with NBNs, independent of their form. As coordinators of NBN usage, national libraries have allowed other organizations, such as university libraries or governmental organizations, to assign NBNs to the resources these organizations preserve for the long term. In such case, the national library coordinates the use of NBNs at the national level. National libraries can also provide URN resolution services and technical services to other NBN users. These organizations are expected to either establish their own URN resolution services or use the technical infrastructure provided by the national library. URN:NBNs are expected to be resolvable and support one or more resolution services. Although NBNs can be used to identify component resources, the NBN namespace does not specify a generic, intrinsic syntax for doing that. However, there are at least two different ways in which component resources can be taken into account within the NBN namespace. The simplest and probably the most common approach is to assign a separate NBN for each component resource, such as a file containing a digitized page of a book, and make no provisions to make such NBNs discernible in a systematic way from others. Second, if the stipulations of the URI generic syntax [RFC3986] and the Internet media type specification [RFC2046] are met, in accordance with the provisions in RFC 8141 [RFC8141], the URN f-component can be attached to URN:NBNs in order to indicate the desired location within the resource supplied by URN resolution. From the library community point of view, it is important that the f-component is not a part of the Namespace-Specific String (NSS), and therefore f-component attachment does not mean that the relevant component part is identified. Moreover, the resolution process still retrieves the entire resource even if there is an f-component. The component part selection is applied by the resolution client (e.g., browser) to the resource returned by the resolution process. In other words, in this latter case the component parts are just logical and physical parts of the identified resource whereas in the former cases they are independently named entities.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 7
   Resources identified by NBNs are not always available in the
   Internet.  If one is not, the URN:NBN can resolve to a surrogate such
   as a metadata record describing the identified resource.

   Section 4 below, and particularly Section 4.4, presents a detailed
   overview of the application of the URN:NBN namespace as well as the
   principles of, and systems used for, the resolution of NBN-based
   URNs.

4. National Bibliography Number URNs

4.1. Assignment

National Bibliography Number (NBN) is a generic term referring to a group of identifier systems administered by national libraries and institutions authorized by them. The NBN assignment is typically performed by the organization hosting the resource. National libraries are committed to permanent preservation of their deposit collections. Assignment of NBN-based URNs is controlled on a national level by the national library (or national libraries, if there is more than one). National guidelines can differ, but the identified resources themselves are usually persistent. Different national URN:NBN assignment policies have resulted in varying levels of control of the assignment process. Manual URN:NBN assignment by the library personnel provides the tightest control, especially if the URN:NBNs cover only resources catalogued into the national bibliography. In most national libraries, the scope of URN:NBN is already much broader than this. Usage rules can vary within one country, from one URN:NBN sub-namespace to the next. Each national library uses NBNs independently of other national libraries; apart from this document, there are no guidelines that specify or control NBN usage. As such, NBNs are unique only on the national level. When used as URNs, base NBN strings MUST be augmented with a controlled prefix, which is the particular nation's ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 two-letter country code (referred to as "ISO country code" below) [ISO3166-1]. These prefixes guarantee uniqueness of the URN:NBNs at the global scale [ISO3166MA]. National libraries using URN:NBNs usually specify local assignment policies for themselves. Such policy can limit the URN:NBN usage to, e.g., the resources stored in the national library's digital collections or databases. Although this specification does not
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 8
   specify principles for URN:NBN assignment policies that can be
   applied, NBNs assigned to short-lived resources should not be made
   URN:NBNs unless such policy can be justified.

   URN:NBN assignment policy can clarify, for instance, the local policy
   concerning identifier assignment to component parts of resources and
   can specify, with sufficient detail, the syntax of local component
   identifiers (if there is one as a discernible part of the NBNs).  The
   policy can also cover any employed extensions to the default NBN
   scope.

   NBNs as such are locally but not globally unique; two national
   libraries can assign the same NBN to different resources.  A prefix,
   based on the ISO country code as described above, guarantees the
   global uniqueness of URN:NBNs.  Once an NBN has been assigned to a
   resource, it MUST be persistent, and therefore URN:NBNs are
   persistent as well.

   A URN:NBN, once it has been generated from a NBN, MUST NOT be reused
   for another resource.

   Users of the URN:NBN namespace MUST ensure that they do not assign
   the same URN:NBN twice.  Different policies can be applied to
   guarantee this.  For instance, NBNs and corresponding URN:NBNs can be
   assigned sequentially by programs in order to avoid human mistakes.
   It is also possible to use printable representations of checksums
   such as SHA-1 [RFC6234] as NBNs.

4.2. Syntax

The Namespace-Specific String (NSS) will consist of three parts: o a prefix consisting of an ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code and optional sub-namespace code(s) separated by a colon(s); o a hyphen (-) as the delimiting character; and, o an NBN string assigned by the national library or sub-delegated authority.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 9
   The following formal definition uses ABNF [RFC5234].

    nbn-nss     = prefix "-" nbn-string

    prefix      = iso-cc *( ":" subspc )
                ; The entire prefix is case insensitive.

    iso-cc      = 2ALPHA
                ; Alpha-2 country code as assigned by part 1 of ISO 3166
                ; (identifies the national library to which the branch
                ; is delegated).

    subspc      = 1*(ALPHA / DIGIT)
                ; As assigned by the respective national library.

    nbn-string  = path-rootless
                ; The "path-rootless" rule is defined in RFC 3986.
                ; Syntax requirements specified in RFC 8141 MUST be
                ; taken into account.

   A colon SHOULD be used within the prefix only as a delimiting
   character between the ISO 3166-1 country code and sub-namespace
   code(s), which splits the national namespace into smaller parts.

   The structure (if any) of the nbn_string is determined by the
   authority for the prefix.  Whereas the prefix is regarded as case
   insensitive, NBN strings can be case sensitive at the preference of
   the assigning authority; parsers therefore MUST treat these as case
   sensitive, and any case mapping needed to introduce case
   insensitivity is the responsibility of the relevant resolution
   system.

   A hyphen SHOULD be used as the delimiting character between the
   prefix and the NBN string.  Within the NBN string, a hyphen MAY be
   used for separating different sections of the identifier from one
   another.

   All two-letter codes are reserved by the ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency
   for either existing or possible future ISO country codes (or for
   private use).

   Sub-namespace identifiers MUST be registered on the national level by
   the national library that assigned the identifier.  The list of such
   identifiers can be made publicly available via the Web.

   Note that because case mapping for ASCII letters is completely
   reversible and does not lose information, the case used in case-
   insensitive matching is a local matter.  Implementations can convert
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 10
   to lower or upper case as they see fit; they only need to do it
   consistently.

4.2.1. Usage of r-component and q-component

URN:NBN resolvers do not currently support the use of either r-component or q-component. Resolution services based on r-component can be implemented in the future when the r-component syntax and semantics have been specified.

4.2.2. Usage of f-component

If URN:NBN resolves to the identified resource and the media type of the resource supports f-component usage, it can be used to indicate a location within the identified resource. Persistence is achieved if the URN:NBN is assigned to one and only one version of a resource, such as a PDF/A version of a book. The URN:NBN namespace does not impose any restrictions of its own on f-component usage.

4.3. Encoding Considerations and Lexical Equivalence

Expressing NBNs as URNs is usually straightforward, as normally only ASCII characters are used in NBN strings. If this is not the case, non-ASCII characters in NBNs MUST be translated into canonical form as specified in RFC 8141. If a national library uses NBNs that can contain percent-encoded characters higher than U+007F, the library needs to carefully define the canonical transformation from these NBNs into URNs, including normalization forms. When an NBN is used as a URN, the NSS MUST consist of three parts: o a prefix, structured as a primary prefix, which is a two-letter ISO 3166-1 country code of the library's country, and zero or more secondary prefixes that are each indicated by a delimiting colon character (:) and a sub-namespace identifier; o a hyphen (-) as a delimiting character; and, o the NBN string. Different delimiting characters are not semantically equivalent. The syntax and roles of the three parts listed above are described in Section 4.2.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 11
   If there are several national libraries in one country, these
   libraries MUST agree on how to divide the national namespace between
   themselves using this method before the URN:NBN assignment begins in
   any of these libraries.

   A national library MAY also assign URN:NBN sub-namespaces to trusted
   organizations such as universities or government institutions.  The
   sub-namespace MAY be further divided by the partner organization.
   All sub-namespace identifiers used within a country-code-based
   namespace MUST be registered on the national level by the national
   library that assigned the code.  The national register of these codes
   SHOULD be made available online.

   Being part of the prefix, sub-namespace identifier strings are case-
   insensitive.  They MUST NOT contain any colons or hyphens.

   Formally, two URN:NBNs are lexically equivalent if they are octet-
   by-octet equal after the following (conceptional) preprocessing:

   1.  convert all characters in the leading "urn:nbn:" token to a
       single case;

   2.  convert all characters in the prefix (country code and its
       optional sub-divisions) to a single case; and,

   3.  convert all characters embedded in any percent-encodings to a
       single case.

   Models (indicated line break inserted for readability):

      URN:NBN:<ISO 3166 alpha-2 country code>-<assigned NBN string>

      URN:NBN:<ISO 3166 alpha-2 country code>:<sub-namespace code>-\
      <assigned NBN string>

   Examples:

      URN:NBN:fi-fe201003181510

      urn:nbn:ch:bel-9039

      urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-3475

      urn:nbn:hu-3006
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 12

4.4. Resolution and Persistence of NBN-based URNs

Eventually, URNs might be resolved with the help of a Global Resolver Discovery Service (GRDS), and URN:NBN syntax makes it possible to locate the relevant resolver. Since no GRDS system has been installed yet in the Internet, URN:NBNs are embedded in HTTP URIs in order to make them actionable in the present Internet. In these HTTP URIs, the authority part must point to the appropriate URN resolution service. For instance, in Finland, the address of the national URN resolver is <http://urn.fi>. Thus, the HTTP URI for the Finnish URN in the example above is <http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201003181510>. The country-code-based prefix part of the URN:NBN namespace-specific string will provide a hint needed to find the correct resolution service for URN:NBNs from the GRDS when it is established. There are three interrelated aspects of persistence that need to be discussed: persistence of the objects itself, persistence of the identifier, and persistence of the URN resolvers. NBNs have traditionally been assigned to printed resources, which tend to be persistent. In contrast, digital resources require frequent migrations to guarantee accessibility. Although it is impossible to estimate how often migrations are needed, hardware and software upgrades take place frequently, and a lifetime exceeding 10-20 years can be considered as long. However, it is a common practice to keep also the original and previously migrated versions of resources. Therefore, even outdated versions of resources can be available in digital archives, no matter how old or difficult to use they have become. If all versions of a resource are kept, a user who requires authenticity can retrieve the original version of the resource, whereas a user to whom the ease of use is a priority is likely to be satisfied with the latest version. In order to enable the users to find the best match, a national library can link all manifestations of a resource to each other so as to make a user aware of them. Thus, even if specific versions of digital resources are not normally persistent, persistent identifiers such as URN:NBNs support information architectures that enable persistent access to any version of the resource, including ones that can only be utilized by using digital archaeology tools such as custom-made applications to render the resource.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 13
   Persistence of URN resolvers themselves is mainly an organizational
   issue that is related to the persistence of organizations maintaining
   them.  As URN:NBN resolution services will be supplied (primarily) by
   the national libraries, these services are likely to be long lived.

4.5. Additional Considerations

It is a good idea to apply URN:NBNs (or other persistent identifiers) to all resources that have been prioritized in the organization's digital preservation plan. Assignment of URN:NBNs to resources that are known to not be persistent should be considered carefully. URN:NBNs can, however, be applied to resources that have a low-level preservation priority and will not be migrated to more modern file formats or preserved via emulation. If the identified version of a resource has disappeared, the resolution process can supply a surrogate if one exists. A surrogate can be, for instance, a more modern digital version of the original electronic resource.

5. URN Namespace ID (NID) Registration for the National Bibliography Number (NBN)

This URN namespace registration describes how National Bibliography Numbers (NBNs) can be supported within the URN framework; it uses the updated IANA template specified in RFC 8141. Namespace Identifier: NBN This namespace ID was formally assigned to the National Bibliography Number in October 2001, when the namespace was registered officially [RFC3188]. Utilization of URN:NBNs had started in demo systems already in 1998. Since 2001, tens of millions of URN:NBNs have been assigned. The number of users of the namespace has grown in two ways: new national libraries have started using NBNs, and many national libraries using the system have formed new liaisons. Version: 4 Date: 2018-04-09
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 14
   Registrant:
      Name: Juha Hakala
      Affiliation: Senior Adviser, The National Library of Finland
      Email: juha.hakala@helsinki.fi
      Postal: P.O. Box 15, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland
      Web URL: http://www.nationallibrary.fi/

      The National Library of Finland registered the namespace on behalf
      of the Conference of the European National Librarians (CENL) and
      Conference of Directors of National Libraries (CDNL).  The NBN
      namespace is available for free for the national libraries.  They
      can allow other organizations to assign URN:NBNs and use the
      resolution services established by the library for free or for a
      fee.  The fees, if collected, can be based on, e.g., the
      maintenance costs of the system.

   Purpose:  See Section 3 of RFC 8458

   Syntax:  See Section 4.2 of RFC 8458

   Assignment:  See Section 4.1 of RFC 8458

   Security and Privacy:  See Section 7 of RFC 8458

   Interoperability:
      National libraries and their partners usually apply URN:NBNs if a
      standard identifier such as ISBN is not applicable for the
      resource to be identified.  Some overlap with other URN namespaces
      is possible.

      URN:NBNs may contain characters which must be percent-encoded, but
      usually they consist of printable ASCII characters only.

   Resolution:  See Section 4.4 of RFC 8458

   Documentation:  RFC 8458

   Revision Information:
      This version of the URN:NBN namespace registration has been
      updated to use the revised definition of URN syntax from RFC 8141,
      although usage of r-components is not specified yet.  In addition,
      non-ISO 3166 (country code) based NBNs have been deleted due to
      lack of deployment.  The entire NBN prefix is now specified to be
      case insensitive in accordance with established practice.  This
      version also includes numerous clarifications based on actual
      usage of URN:NBNs.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 15

6. IANA Considerations

IANA has updated the existing registration of the formal URN namespace, "NBN", using the template given above in Section 5.

7. Security Considerations

This document defines means of encoding NBNs as URNs. A URN resolution service for NBN-based URNs is depicted but only at a generic level; thus, questions of secure or authenticated resolution mechanisms and authentication of users are out of scope of this document. Although no validation mechanisms are specified on the global level (beyond a routine check of those characters that require special encoding when employed in URIs), NBNs assigned by any given authority can have a well-specified and rich syntax (including, e.g., fixed length and checksum). In such cases, it is possible to validate the correctness of NBNs programmatically. Issues regarding intellectual property rights associated with objects identified by the URN:NBNs are beyond the scope of this document, as are questions about rights to the databases that might be used to construct resolution services. Beyond the generic security considerations laid out in the underlying documents listed in the Normative References, no specific security threats have been identified for NBN-based URNs.

8. References

8.1. Normative References

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>. [RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 16
   [RFC8141]  Saint-Andre, P. and J. Klensin, "Uniform Resource Names
              (URNs)", RFC 8141, DOI 10.17487/RFC8141, April 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8141>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

8.2. Informative References

[IANA-URI] IANA, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Schemes", <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes>. [IANA-URN] IANA, "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespaces", <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces>. [ISBN-namespace] Griffiths, S., "Namespace Registration for International Standard Book Number (ISBN) ISO 2108:2017", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/isbn>. [ISO3166-1] ISO, "Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions -- Part 1: Country codes", ISO 3166-1:2013, November 2013, <https://www.iso.org/standard/63545.html>. [ISO3166MA] ISO, "ISO 3166 Country Codes", <https://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes.htm>. [ISSN-namespace] Bequet, G., "Namespace Registration for International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) and Linking ISSN (ISSN-L) based on ISO 3297:2007", June 2017, <https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/issn>. [NBN-Resolving] Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, "URN:NBN Resolver fuer Deutschland und Schweiz: Information ueber Partner Institutionen", <https://nbn-resolving.org/institutions>. [PERSID] PersID initiative, 2009-2011, "persid: Building a persistent identifier infrastructure", <http://www.persid.org>.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 17
   [RFC2046]  Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
              Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types", RFC 2046,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2046, November 1996,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2046>.

   [RFC2141]  Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, DOI 10.17487/RFC2141,
              May 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2141>.

   [RFC2288]  Lynch, C., Preston, C., and R. Daniel, "Using Existing
              Bibliographic Identifiers as Uniform Resource Names",
              RFC 2288, DOI 10.17487/RFC2288, February 1998,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2288>.

   [RFC2611]  Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom,
              "URN Namespace Definition Mechanisms", BCP 33, RFC 2611,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2611, June 1999,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2611>.

   [RFC3044]  Rozenfeld, S., "Using The ISSN (International Serial
              Standard Number) as URN (Uniform Resource Names) within an
              ISSN-URN Namespace", RFC 3044, DOI 10.17487/RFC3044,
              January 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3044>.

   [RFC3187]  Hakala, J. and H. Walravens, "Using International Standard
              Book Numbers as Uniform Resource Names", RFC 3187,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3187, October 2001,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3187>.

   [RFC3188]  Hakala, J., "Using National Bibliography Numbers as
              Uniform Resource Names", RFC 3188, DOI 10.17487/RFC3188,
              October 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3188>.

   [RFC3406]  Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom,
              "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition
              Mechanisms", RFC 3406, DOI 10.17487/RFC3406, October 2002,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3406>.

   [RFC6234]  Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
              (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6234, May 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6234>.

   [RFC8254]  Klensin, J. and J. Hakala, "Uniform Resource Name (URN)
              Namespace Registration Transition", RFC 8254,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8254, October 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8254>.
Top   ToC   RFC8458 - Page 18

Appendix A. Significant Changes from RFC 3188

Numerous clarifications have been made based on a decade of experience with RFC 3188. NBNs that are not based on ISO 3166 (country codes) have been removed due to lack of usage. In accordance with established practice, the whole NBN prefix is now declared case insensitive. The document is based on the new URN syntax specification, RFC 8141. Use of query components and fragment components with this namespace is now specified in accordance with RFC 8141.

Acknowledgements

Revision of RFC 3188 started during the project PersID [PERSID]. Later, the revision was included in the charter of the URNbis Working Group and worked on in that group in parallel with what became RFCs 8141 and 8254. The author wishes to thank his colleagues in the PersID project and the URNbis participants for their support and review comments. Tommi Jauhiainen has provided feedback on an early draft version of this document. The author wishes to thank Tommi Jauhiainen, Bengt Neiss, and Lars Svensson for the comments they have provided to various draft versions of this document. John Klensin provided significant editorial and advisory support for later draft versions of the document.

Contributors

This document would not have been possible without contributions by Alfred Hoenes.

Author's Address

Juha Hakala The National Library of Finland P.O. Box 26 FIN-00014 Helsinki University Finland Email: juha.hakala@helsinki.fi