Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETF RFCsSIP
93929190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 4926

A URN Namespace for GEANT

Pages: 9
Informational

ToP   noToC   RFC4926 - Page 1
Network Working Group                                           T. Kalin
Request for Comments: 4926                                     M. Molina
Category: Informational                                            DANTE
                                                               July 2007


                       A URN Namespace for GEANT

Status of This Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
   memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

Abstract

This document describes a proposed URN (Uniform Resource Name) namespace that would be managed by DANTE, representing European Research and academic networks, for naming persistent resources defined by GEANT, the Consortium of European Academic and Research Networks, its projects, activities, working groups, and other designated subordinates.
ToP   noToC   RFC4926 - Page 2

1. Introduction

The Consortium of European Academic and Research Networks (GEANT) provides high-speed, high-quality network connectivity for education institutions, universities, and research centres in Europe. The network infrastructure is composed of several National Research and Education Networks (NRENs) and their European-wide interconnection, GEANT. The current network is GEANT2 [6], and is the seventh generation of pan-European research and education network, successor to the pan-European multi-gigabit research network GEANT. DANTE [7] is a UK-based organization representing the members of the Consortium and operating the GEANT2 Network. This cooperative work is mainly done in the framework of EU-funded projects. The biggest of such activities is currently the GN2 project [6], started in September 2004, that follows other successful ones that have evolved the European Networks for Research and Education for almost two decades. It is expected that these activities and the network evolution will continue to be supported by the European Union and all European governments in the years to come, as they view the existence of a state-of-the-art network for research in Europe as being of top strategic importance. We will refer to the organization involved in these projects and those that benefit from their outcome as the "GEANT community". The GEANT community produces many kinds of documents: specifications, working drafts, project reports, schemas, stylesheets, etc. The community wishes to provide global, distributed, persistent, location-independent names for these resources. The Uniform Resource Name (URN) variant of URIs meets these requirements. The GEANT community and other GEANT-affiliated groups would benefit from the GEANT URN proposal by having an easy, efficient way to assign globally unique, persistent identifiers to resources that they create. The nature of GEANT work is that it serves the needs of many communities of interest. A namespace managed so as to facilitate the creation, registration, and resolution of unique, persistent identifiers would be of great value for GEANT, its affiliates, and the higher education community generally. The possibility of fitting the naming needs under existing namespaces has been considered, but the conclusion was that the number of activities and the size of the developers community is such that creating a lot of (possibly uncoordinated) dependencies from other namespaces is undesirable. The proposed URN namespace specification is for a formal namespace.
ToP   noToC   RFC4926 - Page 3

2. Specification Template

Namespace ID: geant Registration Information: Registration Version Number 1 Registration Date: 2006-03-21 Registrant of the namespace: DANTE ATTN: Maurizio Molina City House 126 - 130 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 1PQ United Kingdom Phone: +44 1223 371340 Contact: Tomaz Kalin Affiliation: DANTE City House 126 - 130 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 1PQ Email: tomaz.kalin@dante.org.uk Phone: +386 1 430 3055 Syntactic structure: The Namespace Specific Strings (NSS) of all URNs assigned by GEANT will conform to the syntax defined in section 2.2 of RFC 2141, "URN Syntax" [2]. In addition, all GEANT URN NSSs will consist of a left-to-right series of tokens delimited by colons. The left-to-right sequence of colon-delimited tokens corresponds to descending nodes in a tree. To the right of the lowest naming authority node, there may be zero, one, or more levels of hierarchical naming nodes terminating in a rightmost leaf node. See the section below entitled "Identifier assignment" for more on the semantics of NSSs. This syntax convention is captured in the following normative ABNF rules for GEANT NSSs (see RFC 4234 [1]):
ToP   noToC   RFC4926 - Page 4
         GEANT-NSS        =   1*(subStChar) 0*(":" 1*(subStChar))

         subStChar       =   trans / "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG

         trans           =   ALPHA / DIGIT / other / reserved

         other           =   "(" / ")" / "+" / "," / "-" / "." /
                             "=" / "@" / ";" / "$" /
                             "_" / "!" / "*" / "'"

         reserved        =   "%" / "/" / "?" / "#"

         The exclusion of the colon from the list of "other" characters
         means that the colon can only occur as a delimiter between
         string tokens.  Note that this ABNF rule set guarantees that
         any valid GEANT NSS is also a valid RFC 2141 NSS.

   Relevant ancillary documentation:

         None.

   Identifier uniqueness:

         It is the responsibility of DANTE to guarantee uniqueness of
         the names of immediately subordinate naming authorities.  Each
         lower-level naming authority in turn inherits the
         responsibility of guaranteeing uniqueness of names in their
         branch of the naming tree.

   Identifier persistence:

         DANTE bears ultimate responsibility for maintaining the
         usability of GEANT URNs over time.  This responsibility may be
         delegated to subordinate naming authorities per the discussion
         in the section below on identifier assignment.  That section
         provides a mechanism for the delegation to be revoked in the
         case a subordinate naming authority ceases to function.

   Identifier assignment:

         DANTE will create an initial series of immediately subordinate
         naming authorities, and will define a process for adding to
         that list of authorities.  Each top-level working group of
         GEANT will be invited to designate a naming authority and to
         suggest one or more candidate names.
ToP   noToC   RFC4926 - Page 5
         Institutions and communities affiliated with GEANT may request,
         through their designated GEANT liaison, that they be granted
         GEANT-subordinate naming authority status.  They may propose
         candidate names for that authority.  One way for such entities
         to guarantee uniqueness of their proposed name is to base it on
         a DNS name.  That is, if, e.g., the German National Research
         and Education Network wished to be designated a subordinate
         naming authority under GEANT, the institutional GEANT liaison
         could propose to DANTE to be delegated control over names
         beginning with "urn:geant:dfn.de".  Institutions seeking
         affiliation with GEANT should send email to
         geant-submit@dante.org.uk, nominating an institutional liaison
         and providing contact information for that person.

         On at least an annual basis, DANTE will contact the liaisons or
         directors of each immediately subordinate naming authority.  If
         there is no response, or if the respondent indicates that they
         wish to relinquish naming authority, the authority over that
         branch of the tree reverts to GEANT.  This process will be
         enforced recursively by each naming authority on its
         subordinates.  This process guarantees that responsibility for
         each branch of the tree will lapse for less than one year, at
         worst, before being reclaimed by a superior authority.

         Lexical equivalence of two GEANT namespace specific strings
         (NSSs) is defined below as an exact, case-sensitive string
         match.  DANTE will assign names of immediately subordinate
         naming authorities in lowercase only.  This forestalls the
         registration of two GEANT-subordinate naming authorities whose
         names differ only in case.

   Identifier resolution:

         DANTE will maintain an index of all GEANT and GEANT workgroup
         assigned URNs on its Web site,
         http://www.dante.net/urn-geant/urn-geant.html.  That index will
         map URNs to resource identifiers, usually URLs.  GEANT-
         affiliated naming authorities will specify how to resolve the
         URNs they assign if they are resolvable.

   Lexical equivalence:

         Lexical equivalence of two GEANT Namespace Specific Strings
         (NSSs) is defined as an exact, case-sensitive string match.

   Conformance with URN syntax:

         All GEANT NSSs fully conform to RFC 2141 syntax rules for NSSs.
ToP   noToC   RFC4926 - Page 6
   Validation mechanism:

         As specified in the "Identifier resolution" section above,
         DANTE will maintain an index of all GEANT and GEANT workgroup
         assigned URNs on its Web site,
         http://www.dante.net/urn-geant/urn-geant.html Presence in that
         index implies that a given URN is valid.  GEANT-affiliated
         naming authorities will specify how to validate the URNs they
         assign.

   Scope:

         Global.

3. Security Considerations

There are no additional security considerations beyond those normally associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general.

4. Namespace Considerations

Registration of an Namespace Identifier (NID) specific to GEANT is reasonable given the following considerations: 1. GEANT would like to assign URNs to some very fine-grained objects. This does not seem to be the primary intended use of the XMLORG namespace (RFC 3120) [3], or the more tightly controlled OASIS namespace (RFC 3121) [4]. 2. GEANT seeks naming autonomy. GEANT is not a member of OASIS, so becoming a subordinate naming authority under the OASIS URN space is not an option. 3. GEANT will want to assign URNs to non-XML objects as well. That is another reason that XMLORG may not be an appropriate higher- level naming authority for GEANT. Some GEANT-developed schema and namespaces may be good candidates for inclusion in the XMLORG or possible future "EU" registry. The fact that such an object might already have a GEANT-assigned URN shouldn't be a hindrance. RFC 3406 [5] (which replaced RFC 2611) includes an explicit statement that two or more URNs may point to the same resource. A resource with a GEANT-assigned Namespace Specific String would, of course, be given an XMLORG or EU Namespace Specific String as it enters the XMLORG or "EU" registry.
ToP   noToC   RFC4926 - Page 7

5. Community Considerations

The assignment and use of identifiers within the namespace are open, and the related rule is established by DANTE. Registration agencies (the next level naming authorities) will be the European National Research and Education Networks and the established organizational cross-border formations. It is expected that the majority of the NRENs and all GEANT base activities make use of the GEANT namespace. After the establishment of the GEANT namespace, the consortium will, as soon as practical, establish a resolution service (analogously to other distributed pan-European services, like EduROAM, PerfSONAR, etc.) for the namespace clients.

6. IANA Considerations

IANA has registered the "geant" NID within the IANA registry of URN NIDs.

7. Normative References

[1] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.

8. Informative References

[2] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997. [3] Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for XML.org", RFC 3120, June 2001. [4] Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for OASIS", RFC 3121, June 2001. [5] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom, "URN Namespace Definition Mechanisms", BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002. [6] GEANT2 project's Web site, <http://www.geant2.net/>. [7] DANTE's company Web site, <http://www.dante.net/>.
ToP   noToC   RFC4926 - Page 8

Authors' Addresses

T. Kalin DANTE City House 126 - 130 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 1PQ United Kingdom EMail: tomaz.kalin@dante.org.uk Maurizio Molina DANTE City House 126 - 130 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 1PQ United Kingdom EMail: maurizio.molina@dante.org.uk
ToP   noToC   RFC4926 - Page 9
Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.