Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETF RFCsSIP
929190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 4749

RTP Payload Format for the G.729.1 Audio Codec

Pages: 14
Proposed Standard
Updated by:  5459

Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 1
Network Working Group                                         A. Sollaud
Request for Comments: 4749                                France Telecom
Category: Standards Track                                   October 2006


             RTP Payload Format for the G.729.1 Audio Codec

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

This document specifies a Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) payload format to be used for the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) G.729.1 audio codec. A media type registration is included for this payload format.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ....................................................2 2. Background ......................................................2 3. Embedded Bit Rates Considerations ...............................3 4. RTP Header Usage ................................................3 5. Payload Format ..................................................4 5.1. Payload Structure ..........................................4 5.2. Payload Header: MBS Field ..................................4 5.3. Payload Header: FT Field ...................................6 5.4. Audio Data .................................................6 6. Payload Format Parameters .......................................7 6.1. Media Type Registration ....................................7 6.2. Mapping to SDP Parameters ..................................8 6.2.1. Offer-Answer Model Considerations ...................9 6.2.2. Declarative SDP Considerations .....................11 7. Congestion Control .............................................11 8. Security Considerations ........................................11 9. IANA Considerations ............................................12 10. References ....................................................12 10.1. Normative References .....................................12 10.2. Informative References ...................................12
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 2

1. Introduction

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) recommendation G.729.1 [1] is a scalable and wideband extension of the recommendation G.729 [9] audio codec. This document specifies the payload format for packetization of G.729.1 encoded audio signals into the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). The payload format itself is described in Section 5. A media type registration and the details for the use of G.729.1 with SDP are given in Section 6. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT","RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [2].

2. Background

G.729.1 is an 8-32 kbps scalable wideband (50-7000 Hz) speech and audio coding algorithm interoperable with G.729, G.729 Annex A, and G.729 Annex B. It provides a standardized solution for packetized voice applications that allows a smooth transition from narrowband to wideband telephony. The most important services addressed are IP telephony and videoconferencing, either for enterprise corporate networks or for mass market (like Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) emulation over DSL or wireless access). Target devices can be IP phones or other VoIP handsets, home gateways, media gateways, IP Private Branch Exchange (IPBX), trunking equipment, voice messaging servers, etc. For all those applications, the scalability feature allows tuning the bit rate versus quality trade-off, possibly in a dynamic way during a session, taking into account service requirements and network transport constraints. The G.729.1 coder produces an embedded bitstream structured in 12 layers corresponding to 12 available bit rates between 8 and 32 kbps. The first layer, at 8 kbps, is called the core layer and is bitstream compatible with the ITU-T G.729/G.729A coder. At 12 kbps, a second layer improves the narrowband quality. Upper layers provide wideband audio (50-7000 Hz) between 14 and 32 kbps, with a 2 kbps granularity allowing graceful quality improvements. Only the core layer is mandatory to decode understandable speech; upper layers provide quality enhancement and wideband enlargement.
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 3
   The codec operates on 20-ms frames, and the default sampling rate is
   16 kHz.  Input and output at 8 kHz are also supported, at all bit
   rates.

3. Embedded Bit Rates Considerations

The embedded property of G.729.1 streams provides a mechanism to adjust the bandwidth demand. At any time, a sender can change its sending bit rate without external signalling, and the receiver will be able to properly decode the frames. It may help to control congestion, since the bandwidth can be adjusted by selecting another bit rate. The ability to adjust the bandwidth may also help when having a fixed bandwidth link dedicated to voice calls, for example in a residential or trunking gateway. In that case, the system can change the bit rates depending on the number of simultaneous calls. This will only impact the sending bandwidth. In order to adjust the receiving bandwidth as well, we introduce an in-band signalling to request the other party to change its own sending bit rate. This in-band request is called MBS, for Maximum Bit rate Supported. It is described in Section 5.2. Note that it is only useful for two-way unicast G.729.1 traffic, because when A sends an in-band MBS to B in order to request that B modify its sending bit rate, it concerns the stream from B to A. If there is no G.729.1 stream in the reverse direction, the MBS will have no effect.

4. RTP Header Usage

The format of the RTP header is specified in RFC 3550 [3]. This payload format uses the fields of the header in a manner consistent with that specification. The RTP timestamp clock frequency is the same as the default sampling frequency: 16 kHz. G.729.1 has also the capability to operate with 8 kHz sampled input/ output signals at all bit rates. It does not affect the bitstream, and the decoder does not require a priori knowledge about the sampling rate of the original signal at the input of the encoder. Therefore, depending on the implementation and the audio acoustic capabilities of the devices, the input of the encoder and/or the output of the decoder can be configured at 8 kHz; however, a 16 kHz RTP clock rate MUST always be used. The duration of one frame is 20 ms, corresponding to 320 samples at 16 kHz. Thus the timestamp is increased by 320 for each consecutive frame.
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 4
   The M bit MUST be set to zero in all packets.

   The assignment of an RTP payload type for this packet format is
   outside the scope of the document, and will not be specified here.
   It is expected that the RTP profile under which this payload format
   is being used will assign a payload type for this codec or specify
   that the payload type is to be bound dynamically (see Section 6.2).

5. Payload Format

5.1. Payload Structure

The complete payload consists of a payload header of 1 octet, followed by zero or more consecutive audio frames at the same bit rate. The payload header consists of two fields: MBS (see Section 5.2) and FT (see Section 5.3). 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | MBS | FT | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + : zero or more frames at the same bit rate : : : +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

5.2. Payload Header: MBS Field

MBS (4 bits): maximum bit rate supported. Indicates a maximum bit rate to the encoder at the site of the receiver of this payload. The value of the MBS field is set according to the following table:
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 5
                         +-------+--------------+
                         |  MBS  | max bit rate |
                         +-------+--------------+
                         |   0   |    8 kbps    |
                         |   1   |    12 kbps   |
                         |   2   |    14 kbps   |
                         |   3   |    16 kbps   |
                         |   4   |    18 kbps   |
                         |   5   |    20 kbps   |
                         |   6   |    22 kbps   |
                         |   7   |    24 kbps   |
                         |   8   |    26 kbps   |
                         |   9   |    28 kbps   |
                         |   10  |    30 kbps   |
                         |   11  |    32 kbps   |
                         | 12-14 |  (reserved)  |
                         |   15  |    NO_MBS    |
                         +-------+--------------+

   The MBS is used to tell the other party the maximum bit rate one can
   receive.  The encoder MUST NOT exceed the sending rate indicated by
   the received MBS.  Note that, due to the embedded property of the
   coding scheme, the encoder can send frames at the MBS rate or any
   lower rate.  As long as it does not exceed the MBS, the encoder can
   change its bit rate at any time without previous notice.

   Note that the MBS is a codec bit rate; the actual network bit rate is
   higher and depends on the overhead of the underlying protocols.

   The MBS received is valid until the next MBS is received, i.e., a
   newly received MBS value overrides the previous one.

   If a payload with a reserved MBS value is received, the MBS MUST be
   ignored.

   The MBS field MUST be set to 15 for packets sent to a multicast group
   and MUST be ignored on packets received from a multicast group.

   The MBS field MUST be set to 15 in all packets when the actual MBS
   value is sent through non-RTP means.  This is out of the scope of
   this specification.

   See Sections 3 and 7 for more details on the use of MBS for
   congestion control.
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 6

5.3. Payload Header: FT Field

FT (4 bits): Frame type of the frame(s) in this packet, as per the following table: +-------+---------------+------------+ | FT | encoding rate | frame size | +-------+---------------+------------+ | 0 | 8 kbps | 20 octets | | 1 | 12 kbps | 30 octets | | 2 | 14 kbps | 35 octets | | 3 | 16 kbps | 40 octets | | 4 | 18 kbps | 45 octets | | 5 | 20 kbps | 50 octets | | 6 | 22 kbps | 55 octets | | 7 | 24 kbps | 60 octets | | 8 | 26 kbps | 65 octets | | 9 | 28 kbps | 70 octets | | 10 | 30 kbps | 75 octets | | 11 | 32 kbps | 80 octets | | 12-14 | (reserved) | | | 15 | NO_DATA | 0 | +-------+---------------+------------+ The FT value 15 (NO_DATA) indicates that there is no audio data in the payload. This MAY be used to update the MBS value when there is no audio frame to transmit. The payload will then be reduced to the payload header. If a payload with a reserved FT value is received, the whole payload MUST be ignored.

5.4. Audio Data

Audio data of a payload contains one or more consecutive audio frames at the same bit rate. The audio frames are packed in order of time, that is, oldest first. The size of one frame is given by the FT field, as per the table in Section 5.3, and the actual number of frames is easy to infer from the size of the audio data part: nb_frames = (size_of_audio_data) / (size_of_one_frame). Only full frames must be considered. So if there is a remainder to the division above, the corresponding remaining bytes in the received payload MUST be ignored.
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 7
   Note that if FT=15, there will be no audio frame in the payload.

6. Payload Format Parameters

This section defines the parameters that may be used to configure optional features in the G.729.1 RTP transmission. The parameters are defined here as part of the media subtype registration for the G.729.1 codec. A mapping of the parameters into the Session Description Protocol (SDP) [5] is also provided for those applications that use SDP. In control protocols that do not use MIME or SDP, the media type parameters must be mapped to the appropriate format used with that control protocol.

6.1. Media Type Registration

This registration is done using the template defined in RFC 4288 [6] and following RFC 3555 [7]. Type name: audio Subtype name: G7291 Required parameters: none Optional parameters: maxbitrate: the absolute maximum codec bit rate for the session, in bits per second. Permissible values are 8000, 12000, 14000, 16000, 18000, 20000, 22000, 24000, 26000, 28000, 30000, and 32000. 32000 is implied if this parameter is omitted. The maxbitrate restricts the range of bit rates which can be used. The bit rates indicated by FT and MBS fields in the RTP packets MUST NOT exceed maxbitrate. mbs: the current maximum codec bit rate supported as a receiver, in bits per second. Permissible values are in the same set as for the maxbitrate parameter, with the constraint that mbs MUST be lower or equal to maxbitrate. If the mbs parameter is omitted, it is set to the maxbitrate value. So if both mbs and maxbitrate are omitted, they are both set to 32000. The mbs parameter corresponds to a MBS value in the RTP packets as per table in Section 5.2 of RFC 4749. Note that this parameter may be dynamically updated by the MBS field of the RTP packets sent; it is not an absolute value for the session. ptime: the recommended length of time (in milliseconds) represented by the media in a packet. See Section 6 of RFC 4566 [5].
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 8
   maxptime:  the maximum length of time (in milliseconds) that can be
      encapsulated in a packet.  See Section 6 of RFC 4566 [5]

   Encoding considerations: This media type is framed and contains
      binary data; see Section 4.8 of RFC 4288 [6].

   Security considerations: See Section 8 of RFC 4749

   Interoperability considerations: none

   Published specification: RFC 4749

   Applications which use this media type: Audio and video conferencing
      tools.

   Additional information: none

   Person & email address to contact for further information:
      Aurelien Sollaud, aurelien.sollaud@orange-ftgroup.com

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Restrictions on usage: This media type depends on RTP framing, and
      hence is only defined for transfer via RTP [3].

   Author: Aurelien Sollaud

   Change controller: IETF Audio/Video Transport working group delegated
      from the IESG

6.2. Mapping to SDP Parameters

The information carried in the media type specification has a specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) [5], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions. When SDP is used to specify sessions employing the G.729.1 codec, the mapping is as follows: o The media type ("audio") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name. o The media subtype ("G7291") goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as the encoding name. The RTP clock rate in "a=rtpmap" MUST be 16000 for G.729.1. o The parameters "ptime" and "maxptime" go in the SDP "a=ptime" and "a=maxptime" attributes, respectively.
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 9
   o  Any remaining parameters go in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute by
      copying them directly from the media type string as a semicolon
      separated list of parameter=value pairs.

   Some example SDP session descriptions utilizing G.729.1 encodings
   follow.

   Example 1: default parameters

      m=audio 53146 RTP/AVP 98
      a=rtpmap:98 G7291/16000

   Example 2: recommended packet duration of 40 ms (=2 frames), maximum
   bit rate is 12 kbps, and initial MBS set to 8 kbps.  It could be a
   loaded PSTN gateway which can operate at 12 kbps but asks to
   initially reduce the bit rate to 8 kbps.

      m=audio 51258 RTP/AVP 99
      a=rtpmap:99 G7291/16000
      a=fmtp:99 maxbitrate=12000; mbs=8000
      a=ptime:40

6.2.1. Offer-Answer Model Considerations

The following considerations apply when using SDP offer-answer procedures [8] to negotiate the use of G.729.1 payload in RTP: o Since G.729.1 is an extension of G.729, the offerer SHOULD announce G.729 support in its "m=audio" line, with G.729.1 preferred. This will allow interoperability with both G.729.1 and G.729-only capable parties. Below is an example of such an offer: m=audio 55954 RTP/AVP 98 18 a=rtpmap:98 G7291/16000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 If the answerer supports G.729.1, it will keep the payload type 98 in its answer, and the conversation will be done using G.729.1. Else, if the answerer supports only G.729, it will leave only the payload type 18 in its answer, and the conversation will be done using G.729 (the payload format for G.729 is defined in Section 4.5.6 of RFC 3551 [4]).
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 10
      Note that when used at 8 kbps in G.729-compatible mode, the
      G.729.1 decoder supports G.729 Annex B.  Therefore, Annex B can be
      advertised (by default, annexb=yes for G729 media type; see
      Section 4.1.9 of RFC 3555 [7]).

   o  The "maxbitrate" parameter is bi-directional.  If the offerer sets
      a maxbitrate value, the answerer MUST reply with a smaller or
      equal value.  The actual maximum bit rate for the session will be
      the minimum.

   o  If the received value for "maxbitrate" is between 8000 and 32000
      but not in the permissible values set, it SHOULD be read as the
      closest lower valid value.  If the received value is lower than
      8000 or greater than 32000, the session MUST be rejected.

   o  The "mbs" parameter is not symmetric.  Values in the offer and the
      answer are independent and take into account local constraints.
      One party MUST NOT start sending frames at a bit rate higher than
      the "mbs" of the other party.  The parameter allows announcing
      this value, prior to the sending of any packet, to prevent the
      remote sender from exceeding the MBS at the beginning of the
      session.

   o  If the received value for "mbs" is greater or equal to 8000 but
      not in the permissible values set, it SHOULD be read as the
      closest lower valid value.  If the received value is lower than
      8000, the session MUST be rejected.

   o  The parameters "ptime" and "maxptime" will in most cases not
      affect interoperability.  The SDP offer-answer handling of the
      "ptime" parameter is described in RFC 3264 [8].  The "maxptime"
      parameter MUST be handled in the same way.

   o  Any unknown parameter in an offer MUST be ignored by the receiver
      and MUST NOT be included in the answer.

   Some special rules apply for mono-directional traffic:

   o  For sendonly streams, the "mbs" parameter is useless and SHOULD
      NOT be used.

   o  For recvonly streams, the "mbs" parameter is the only way to
      communicate the MBS to the sender, since there is no RTP stream
      towards it.  So to request a bit rate change, the receiver will
      need to use an out-of-band mechanism, like a SIP RE-INVITE.
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 11
   Some special rules apply for multicast:

   o  The "mbs" parameter MUST NOT be used.

   o  The "maxbitrate" parameter becomes declarative and MUST NOT be
      negotiated.  This parameter is fixed, and a participant MUST use
      the configuration that is provided for the session.


6.2.2. Declarative SDP Considerations

For declarative use of SDP such as in SAP [10] and RTSP [11], the following considerations apply: o The "mbs" parameter MUST NOT be used. o The "maxbitrate" parameter is declarative and provides the parameter that SHALL be used when receiving and/or sending the configured stream.

7. Congestion Control

Congestion control for RTP SHALL be used in accordance with RFC 3550 [3] and any appropriate profile (for example, RFC 3551 [4]). The embedded and variable bit rates capability of G.729.1 provides a mechanism that may help to control congestion; see Section 3 for more details. The number of frames encapsulated in each RTP payload influences the overall bandwidth of the RTP stream, due to the header overhead. Packing more frames in each RTP payload can reduce the number of packets sent and hence the header overhead, at the expense of increased delay and reduced error robustness.

8. Security Considerations

RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification are subject to the general security considerations discussed in the RTP specification [3] and any appropriate profile (for example, RFC 3551 [4]). As this format transports encoded speech/audio, the main security issues include confidentiality, integrity protection, and authentication of the speech/audio itself. The payload format itself does not have any built-in security mechanisms. Any suitable external mechanisms, such as SRTP [12], MAY be used.
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 12
   This payload format and the G.729.1 encoding do not exhibit any
   significant non-uniformity in the receiver-end computational load and
   thus are unlikely to pose a denial-of-service threat due to the
   receipt of pathological datagrams.

9. IANA Considerations

IANA has registered audio/G7291 as a media subtype; see Section 6.1.

10. References

10.1. Normative References

[1] International Telecommunications Union, "G.729 based Embedded Variable bit-rate coder: An 8-32 kbit/s scalable wideband coder bitstream interoperable with G.729", ITU-T Recommendation G.729.1, May 2006. [2] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [3] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003. [4] Schulzrinne, H. and S. Casner, "RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control", STD 65, RFC 3551, July 2003. [5] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006. [6] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005. [7] Casner, S. and P. Hoschka, "MIME Type Registration of RTP Payload Formats", RFC 3555, July 2003. [8] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model with Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264, June 2002.

10.2. Informative References

[9] International Telecommunications Union, "Coding of speech at 8 kbit/s using conjugate-structure algebraic-code-excited linear- prediction (CS-ACELP)", ITU-T Recommendation G.729, March 1996. [10] Handley, M., Perkins, C., and E. Whelan, "Session Announcement Protocol", RFC 2974, October 2000.
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 13
   [11] Schulzrinne, H., Rao, A., and R. Lanphier, "Real Time Streaming
        Protocol (RTSP)", RFC 2326, April 1998.

   [12] Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K.
        Norrman, "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)",
        RFC 3711, March 2004.

Author's Address

Aurelien Sollaud France Telecom 2 avenue Pierre Marzin Lannion Cedex 22307 France Phone: +33 2 96 05 15 06 EMail: aurelien.sollaud@orange-ftgroup.com
Top   ToC   RFC4749 - Page 14
Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).