Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETF RFCsSIP
9190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 4431

The DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) DNS Resource Record

Pages: 4
Historic

ToP   noToC   RFC4431 - Page 1
Network Working Group                                         M. Andrews
Request for Comments: 4431                   Internet Systems Consortium
Category: Informational                                        S. Weiler
                                                            SPARTA, Inc.
                                                           February 2006


       The DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) DNS Resource Record

Status of This Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
   memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

This document defines a new DNS resource record, called the DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) RR, for publishing DNSSEC trust anchors outside of the DNS delegation chain.

1. Introduction

DNSSEC [1] [2] [3] authenticates DNS data by building public-key signature chains along the DNS delegation chain from a trust anchor, ideally a trust anchor for the DNS root. This document defines a new resource record for publishing such trust anchors outside of the DNS's normal delegation chain. Use of these records by DNSSEC validators is outside the scope of this document, but it is expected that these records will help resolvers validate DNSSEC-signed data from zones whose ancestors either aren't signed or refuse to publish delegation signer (DS) records for their children.

2. DLV Resource Record

The DLV resource record has exactly the same wire and presentation formats as the DS resource record, defined in RFC 4034, Section 5. It uses the same IANA-assigned values in the algorithm and digest type fields as the DS record. (Those IANA registries are known as the "DNS Security Algorithm Numbers" and "DS RR Type Algorithm Numbers" registries.)
ToP   noToC   RFC4431 - Page 2
   The DLV record is a normal DNS record type without any special
   processing requirements.  In particular, the DLV record does not
   inherit any of the special processing or handling requirements of the
   DS record type (described in Section 3.1.4.1 of RFC 4035).  Unlike
   the DS record, the DLV record may not appear on the parent's side of
   a zone cut.  A DLV record may, however, appear at the apex of a zone.

3. Security Considerations

For authoritative servers and resolvers that do not attempt to use DLV RRs as part of DNSSEC validation, there are no particular security concerns -- DLV RRs are just like any other DNS data. Software using DLV RRs as part of DNSSEC validation will almost certainly want to impose constraints on their use, but those constraints are best left to be described by the documents that more fully describe the particulars of how the records are used. At a minimum, it would be unwise to use the records without some sort of cryptographic authentication. More likely than not, DNSSEC itself will be used to authenticate the DLV RRs. Depending on how a DLV RR is used, failure to properly authenticate it could lead to significant additional security problems including failure to detect spoofed DNS data. RFC 4034, Section 8, describes security considerations specific to the DS RR. Those considerations are equally applicable to DLV RRs. Of particular note, the key tag field is used to help select DNSKEY RRs efficiently, but it does not uniquely identify a single DNSKEY RR. It is possible for two distinct DNSKEY RRs to have the same owner name, the same algorithm type, and the same key tag. An implementation that uses only the key tag to select a DNSKEY RR might select the wrong public key in some circumstances. For further discussion of the security implications of DNSSEC, see RFC 4033, RFC 4034, and RFC 4035.

4. IANA Considerations

IANA has assigned DNS type code 32769 to the DLV resource record from the Specification Required portion of the DNS Resource Record Type registry, as defined in [4]. The DLV resource record reuses the same algorithm and digest type registries already used for the DS resource record, currently known as the "DNS Security Algorithm Numbers" and "DS RR Type Algorithm Numbers" registries.
ToP   noToC   RFC4431 - Page 3

5. Normative References

[1] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose, "DNS Security Introduction and Requirements", RFC 4033, March 2005. [2] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose, "Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions", RFC 4034, March 2005. [3] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose, "Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security Extensions", RFC 4035, March 2005. [4] Eastlake, D., Brunner-Williams, E., and B. Manning, "Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations", BCP 42, RFC 2929, September 2000.

Authors' Addresses

Mark Andrews Internet Systems Consortium 950 Charter St. Redwood City, CA 94063 US EMail: Mark_Andrews@isc.org Samuel Weiler SPARTA, Inc. 7075 Samuel Morse Drive Columbia, Maryland 21046 US EMail: weiler@tislabs.com
ToP   noToC   RFC4431 - Page 4
Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).