Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
959493929190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 2705

Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Version 1.0

Pages: 134
Obsoleted by:  3435
Updated by:  3660
Part 1 of 5 – Pages 1 to 29
None   None   Next

ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 1
Network Working Group                                          M. Arango
Request for Comments: 2705                                       RSL COM
Category: Informational                                         A. Dugan
                                                              I. Elliott
                                                   Level3 Communications
                                                              C. Huitema
                                                               Telcordia
                                                              S. Pickett
                                                       Vertical Networks
                                                            October 1999


                 Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP)
                              Version 1.0

Status of this Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
   memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.

IESG NOTE:

   This document is being published for the information of the
   community.  It describes a protocol that is currently being deployed
   in a number of products.  Implementers should be aware of
   developments in the IETF Megaco Working Group and ITF-T SG16 who are
   currently working on a potential successor to this protocol.

Abstract

This document describes an application programming interface and a corresponding protocol (MGCP) for controlling Voice over IP (VoIP) Gateways from external call control elements. MGCP assumes a call control architecture where the call control "intelligence" is outside the gateways and handled by external call control elements. The document is structured in 6 main sections: * The introduction presents the basic assumptions and the relation to other protocols such as H.323, RTSP, SAP or SIP.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 2
   *  The interface section presents a conceptual overview of the MGCP,
      presenting the naming conventions, the usage of the session
      description protocol SDP, and the procedures that compose MGCP:
      Notifications Request, Notification, Create Connection, Modify
      Connection, Delete Connection, AuditEndpoint, AuditConnection and
      RestartInProgress.

   *  The protocol description section presents the MGCP encodings,
      which are based on simple text formats, and the transmission
      procedure over UDP.

   *  The security section presents the security requirement of MGCP,
      and its usage of IP security services (IPSEC).

   *  The event packages section provides an initial definition of
      packages and event names.

   *  The description of the changes made in combining SGCP 1.1 and IPDC
      to create MGCP 1.0.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction .............................................. 5 1.1. Relation with the H.323 standards .................... 7 1.2. Relation with the IETF standards ..................... 8 1.3. Definitions .......................................... 9 2. Media Gateway Control Interface ........................... 9 2.1. Model and naming conventions. ........................ 10 2.1.1. Types of endpoints .............................. 10 2.1.1.1. Digital channel (DS0) ...................... 11 2.1.1.2. Analog line ................................ 11 2.1.1.3. Annoucement server access point ............ 12 2.1.1.4. Interactive Voice Response access point .... 12 2.1.1.5. Conference bridge access point ............. 13 2.1.1.6. Packet relay ............................... 13 2.1.1.7. Wiretap access point ....................... 14 2.1.1.8. ATM "trunk side" interface. ................ 14 2.1.2. Endpoint identifiers ............................ 15 2.1.3. Calls and connections ........................... 17 2.1.3.1. Names of calls ............................. 20 2.1.3.2. Names of connections ....................... 20 2.1.3.3. Management of resources, attributes of ..... 20 2.1.3.4. Special case of local connections .......... 23 2.1.4. Names of Call Agents and other entities ......... 23 2.1.5. Digit maps ...................................... 24 2.1.6. Names of events ................................. 26 2.2. Usage of SDP ......................................... 29 2.3. Gateway Control Commands ............................. 30
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 3
         2.3.1.  EndpointConfiguration ........................... 32
         2.3.2.  NotificationRequest ............................. 33
         2.3.3.  CreateConnection ................................ 38
         2.3.4.  ModifyConnection ................................ 44
         2.3.5.  DeleteConnection (from the Call Agent) .......... 46
         2.3.6.  DeleteConnection (from the VoIP gateway) ........ 51
         2.3.7.  DeleteConnection (multiple connections, from the  51
         2.3.8.  Audit Endpoint .................................. 52
         2.3.9.  Audit Connection ................................ 55
         2.3.10.  Restart in progress ............................ 56
      2.4.  Return codes and error codes. ........................ 58
      2.5.  Reason Codes ......................................... 61
   3.  Media Gateway Control Protocol ............................ 61
      3.1.  General description .................................. 62
      3.2.  Command Header ....................................... 62
         3.2.1.  Command line .................................... 62
            3.2.1.1.  Coding of the requested verb ............... 63
            3.2.1.2.  Transaction Identifiers .................... 63
            3.2.1.3.  Coding of the endpoint identifiers and ..... 64
            3.2.1.4.  Coding of the protocol version ............. 65
         3.2.2.  Parameter lines ................................. 65
            3.2.2.1.  Response Acknowledgement ................... 68
            3.2.2.2.  Local connection options ................... 68
            3.2.2.3.  Capabilities ............................... 70
            3.2.2.4.  Connection parameters ...................... 71
            3.2.2.5.  Reason Codes ............................... 72
            3.2.2.6.  Connection mode ............................ 73
            3.2.2.7.  Coding of event names ...................... 73
            3.2.2.8.  RequestedEvents ............................ 74
            3.2.2.9.  SignalRequests ............................. 76
            3.2.2.10.  ObservedEvent ............................. 76
            3.2.2.11.  RequestedInfo ............................. 76
            3.2.2.12.  QuarantineHandling ........................ 77
            3.2.2.13.  DetectEvents .............................. 77
            3.2.2.14.  EventStates ............................... 77
            3.2.2.15.  RestartMethod ............................. 78
            3.2.2.16.  Bearer Information ........................ 78
      3.3.  Format of response headers ........................... 78
      3.4.  Formal syntax description of the protocol ............ 81
      3.5.  Encoding of the session description .................. 86
         3.5.1.  Usage of SDP for an audio service ............... 86
         3.5.2.  Usage of SDP in a network access service ........ 87
         3.5.3.  Usage of SDP for ATM connections ................ 90
         3.5.4.  Usage of SDP for local connections .............. 91
      3.6.  Transmission over UDP ................................ 91
         3.6.1.  Providing the At-Most-Once functionality ........ 91
         3.6.2.  Transaction identifiers and three ways handshake. 92
         3.6.3.  Computing retransmission timers ................. 93
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 4
         3.6.4.  Piggy backing ................................... 94
         3.6.5.  Provisional responses ........................... 94
   4.  States, failover and race conditions. ..................... 95
      4.1.  Basic Asumptions ..................................... 95
      4.2.  Security, Retransmission, and Detection of Lost ...... 96
      4.3.  Race conditions ...................................... 99
         4.3.1.  Quarantine list ................................. 99
         4.3.2.  Explicit detection ..............................103
         4.3.3.  Ordering of commands, and treatment of disorder .104
         4.3.4.  Fighting the restart avalanche ..................105
         4.3.5.  Disconnected Endpoints ..........................107
   5.  Security requirements .....................................108
      5.1.  Protection of media connections ......................109
   6.  Event packages and end point types ........................109
      6.1.  Basic packages .......................................110
         6.1.1.  Generic Media Package ...........................110
         6.1.2.  DTMF package ....................................112
         6.1.3.  MF Package ......................................113
         6.1.4.  Trunk Package ...................................114
         6.1.5.  Line Package ....................................116
         6.1.6.  Handset emulation package .......................119
         6.1.7.  RTP Package .....................................120
         6.1.8.  Network Access Server Package ...................121
         6.1.9.  Announcement Server Package .....................122
         6.1.10.  Script Package .................................122
      6.2.  Basic endpoint types and profiles ....................123
   7.  Versions and compatibility ................................124
      7.1.  Differences between version 1.0 and draft 0.5 ........124
      7.2.  Differences between draft-04 and draft-05 ............125
      7.3.  Differences between draft-03 and draft-04 ............125
      7.4.  Differences between draft-02 and draft-03 ............125
      7.5.  Differences between draft-01 and draft-02 ............126
      7.6.  The making of MGCP from IPDC and SGCP ................126
      7.7.  Changes between MGCP and initial versions of SGCP ....126
   8.  Security Considerations ...................................128
   9.  Acknowledgements ..........................................128
   10. References ................................................129
   11. Authors' Addresses ........................................130
   12. Appendix A: Proposed "MoveConnection" command .............132
      12.1.  Proposed syntax modification ........................133
   13. Full Copyright Statement ..................................134
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 5

1. Introduction

This document describes an abstract application programming interface and a corresponding protocol (MGCP) for controlling Telephony Gateways from external call control elements called media gateway controllers or call agents. A telephony gateway is a network element that provides conversion between the audio signals carried on telephone circuits and data packets carried over the Internet or over other packet networks. Example of gateways are: * Trunking gateways, that interface between the telephone network and a Voice over IP network. Such gateways typically manage a large number of digital circuits. * Voice over ATM gateways, which operate much the same way as voice over IP trunking gateways, except that they interface to an ATM network. * Residential gateways, that provide a traditional analog (RJ11) interface to a Voice over IP network. Examples of residential gateways include cable modem/cable set-top boxes, xDSL devices, broad-band wireless devices * Access gateways, that provide a traditional analog (RJ11) or digital PBX interface to a Voice over IP network. Examples of access gateways include small-scale voice over IP gateways. * Business gateways, that provide a traditional digital PBX interface or an integrated "soft PBX" interface to a Voice over IP network. * Network Access Servers, that can attach a "modem" to a telephone circuit and provide data access to the Internet. We expect that, in the future, the same gateways will combine Voice over IP services and Network Access services. * Circuit switches, or packet switches, which can offer a control interface to an external call control element. MGCP assumes a call control architecture where the call control "intelligence" is outside the gateways and handled by external call control elements. The MGCP assumes that these call control elements, or Call Agents, will synchronize with each other to send coherent commands to the gateways under their control. MGCP does not define a mechanism for synchronizing Call Agents. MGCP is, in essence, a master/slave protocol, where the gateways are expected to execute commands sent by the Call Agents. In consequence, this document specifies in great detail the expected behavior of the gateways, but
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 6
   only specify those parts of a call agent implementation, such as
   timer management, that are mandated for proper operation of the
   protocol.

   MGCP assumes a connection model where the basic constructs are
   endpoints and connections. Endpoints are sources or sinks of data and
   could be physical or virtual. Examples of physical endpoints are:

   *  An interface on a gateway that terminates a trunk connected to a
      PSTN switch (e.g., Class 5, Class 4, etc.). A gateway that
      terminates trunks is called a trunk gateway.

   *  An interface on a gateway that terminates an analog POTS
      connection to a phone, key system, PBX, etc. A gateway that
      terminates residential POTS lines (to phones) is called a
      residential gateway.

   An example of a virtual endpoint is an audio source in an audio-
   content server. Creation of physical endpoints requires hardware
   installation, while creation of virtual endpoints can be done by
   software.

   Connections may be either point to point or multipoint. A point to
   point connection is an association between two endpoints with the
   purpose of transmitting data between these endpoints. Once this
   association is established for both endpoints, data transfer between
   these endpoints can take place. A multipoint connection is
   established by connecting the endpoint to a multipoint session.

   Connections can be established over several types of bearer networks:

   *  Transmission of audio packets using RTP and UDP over a TCP/IP
      network.

   *  Transmission of audio packets using AAL2, or another adaptation
      layer, over an ATM network.

   *  Transmission of packets over an internal connection, for example
      the TDM backplane or the interconnection bus of a gateway. This is
      used, in particular, for "hairpin" connections, connections that
      terminate in a gateway but are immediately rerouted over the
      telephone network.

   For point-to-point connections the endpoints of a connection could be
   in separate gateways or in the same gateway.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 7

1.1. Relation with the H.323 standards

MGCP is designed as an internal protocol within a distributed system that appears to the outside as a single VoIP gateway. This system is composed of a Call Agent, that may or may not be distributed over several computer platforms, and of a set of gateways, including at least one "media gateway" that perform the conversion of media signals between circuits and packets, and at least one "signalling gateway" when connecting to an SS7 controlled network. In a typical configuration, this distributed gateway system will interface on one side with one or more telephony (i.e. circuit) switches, and on the other side with H.323 conformant systems, as indicated in the following table: ___________________________________________________________________ | Functional| Phone | Terminating | H.323 conformant | | Plane | switch | Entity | systems | |___________|____________|_________________|_______________________| | Signaling | Signaling | Call agent | Signaling exchanges | | Plane | exchanges | | with the call agent | | | through | | through H.225/RAS and| | | SS7/ISUP | | H.225/Q.931. | |___________|____________|_________________|_______________________| | | | | Possible negotiation | | | | | of logical channels | | | | | and transmission | | | | | parameters through | | | | | H.245 with the call | | | | | agent. | |___________|____________|_________________|_______________________| | | | Internal | | | | | synchronization| | | | | through MGCP | | |___________|____________|_________________|_______________________| | Bearer | Connection| Telephony | Transmission of VOIP | | Data | through | gateways | data using RTP | | Transport | high speed| | directly between the | | Plane | trunk | | H.323 station and the| | | groups | | gateway. | |___________|____________|_________________|_______________________| In the MGCP model, the gateways focus on the audio signal translation function, while the Call Agent handles the signaling and call processing functions. As a consequence, the Call Agent implements the "signaling" layers of the H.323 standard, and presents itself as an "H.323 Gatekeeper" or as one or more "H.323 Endpoints" to the H.323 systems.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 8

1.2. Relation with the IETF standards

While H.323 is the recognized standard for VoIP terminals, the IETF has also produced specifications for other types of multi-media applications. These other specifications include: * the Session Description Protocol (SDP), RFC 2327, * the Session Announcement Protocol (SAP), * the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), * the Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP), RFC 2326. The latter three specifications are in fact alternative signaling standards that allow for the transmission of a session description to an interested party. SAP is used by multicast session managers to distribute a multicast session description to a large group of recipients, SIP is used to invite an individual user to take part in a point-to-point or unicast session, RTSP is used to interface a server that provides real time data. In all three cases, the session description is described according to SDP; when audio is transmitted, it is transmitted through the Real-time Transport Protocol, RTP. The distributed gateway systems and MGCP will enable PSTN telephony users to access sessions set up using SAP, SIP or RTSP. The Call Agent provides for signaling conversion, according to the following table:
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 9
    _____________________________________________________________________
   | Functional|  Phone     |  Terminating    |  IETF conforming systems|
   | Plane     |  switch    |  Entity         |                         |
   |___________|____________|_________________|_________________________|
   | Signaling |  Signaling |  Call agent     |  Signaling exchanges    |
   | Plane     |  exchanges |                 |  with the call agent    |
   |           |  through   |                 |  through SAP, SIP or    |
   |           |  SS7/ISUP  |                 |  RTSP.                  |
   |___________|____________|_________________|_________________________|
   |           |            |                 |  Negotiation of session |
   |           |            |                 |  description parameters |
   |           |            |                 |  through SDP (telephony |
   |           |            |                 |  gateway terminated but |
   |           |            |                 |  passed via the call    |
   |           |            |                 |  agent to and from the  |
   |           |            |                 |  IETF conforming system)|
   |___________|____________|_________________|_________________________|
   |           |            |  Internal       |                         |
   |           |            |  synchronization|                         |
   |           |            |  through MGCP   |                         |
   |___________|____________|_________________|_________________________|
   | Bearer    |  Connection|  Telephony      |  Transmission of VoIP   |
   | Data      |  through   |  gateways       |  data using RTP,        |
   | Transport |  high speed|                 |  directly between the   |
   | Plane     |  trunk     |                 |  remote IP end system   |
   |           |  groups    |                 |  and the gateway.       |
   |___________|____________|_________________|_________________________|


   The SDP standard has a pivotal status in this architecture. We will
   see in the following description that we also use it to carry session
   descriptions in MGCP.

1.3. Definitions

Trunk: A communication channel between two switching systems. E.g., a DS0 on a T1 or E1 line.

2. Media Gateway Control Interface

The interface functions provide for connection control and endpoint control. Both use the same system model and the same naming conventions.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 10

2.1. Model and naming conventions

The MGCP assumes a connection model where the basic constructs are endpoints and connections. Connections are grouped in calls. One or more connections can belong to one call. Connections and calls are set up at the initiative of one or several Call Agents.

2.1.1. Types of endpoints

In the introduction, we presented several classes of gateways. Such classifications, however, can be misleading. Manufacturers can arbitrarily decide to provide several types of services in a single packaging. A single product could well, for example, provide some trunk connections to telephony switches, some primary rate connections and some analog line interfaces, thus sharing the characteristics of what we described in the introduction as "trunking", "access" and "residential" gateways. MGCP does not make assumptions about such groupings. We simply assume that media gateways support collections of endpoints. The type of the endpoint determines its functionalities. Our analysis, so far, has led us to isolate the following basic endpoint types: * Digital channel (DS0), * Analog line, * Annoucement server access point, * Interactive Voice Response access point, * Conference bridge access point, * Packet relay, * Wiretap access point, * ATM "trunk side" interface. In this section, we will develop the expected behavior of such end points. This list is not limitative. There may be other types of endpoints defined in the future, for example test endpoint that could be used to check network quality, or frame-relay endpoints that could be used to managed audio channels multiplexed over a frame-relay virtual circuit.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 11
2.1.1.1. Digital channel (DS0)
Digital channels provide an 8Khz*8bit service. Such channels are found in trunk and ISDN interfaces. They are typically part of digital multiplexes, such as T1, E1, T3 or E3 interfaces. Media gateways that support such channels are capable of translating the digital signals received on the channel, which may be encoded according to A or mu-law, using either the complete set of 8 bits or only 7 of these bits, into audio packets. When the media gateway also supports a NAS service, the gateway shall be capable of receiving either audio-encoded data (modem connection) or binary data (ISDN connection) and convert them into data packets. +------- +------------+| (channel) ===|DS0 endpoint| -------- Connections +------------+| +------- Media gateways should be able to establish several connections between the endpoint and the packet networks, or between the endpoint and other endpoints in the same gateway. The signals originating from these connections shall be mixed according to the connection "mode", as specified later in this document. The precise number of connections that an endpoint support is a characteristic of the gateway, and may in fact vary according with the allocation of resource within the gateway. In some cases, digital channels are used to carry signalling. This is the case for example of SS7 "F" links, or ISDN "D" channels. Media gateways that support these signalling functions shall be able to send and receive the signalling packets to and from a call agent, using the "back haul" procedures defined by the SIGTRAN working group of the IETF. Digital channels are sometimes used in conjunction with channel associated signalling, such as "MF R2". Media gateways that support these signalling functions shall be able to detect and produce the corresponding signals, such as for example "wink" or "A", according to the event signalling and reporting procedures defined in MGCP.
2.1.1.2. Analog line
Analog lines can be used either as a "client" interface, providing service to a classic telephone unit, or as a "service" interface, allowing the gateway to send and receive analog calls. When the media gateway also supports a NAS service, the gateway shall be capable of receiving audio-encoded data (modem connection) and convert them into data packets.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 12
                                         +-------
                        +---------------+|
              (line) ===|analog endpoint| -------- Connections
                        +---------------+|
                                         +-------

   Media gateways should be able to establish several connections
   between the endpoint and the packet networks, or between the endpoint
   and other endpoints in the same gateway.  The audio signals
   originating from these connections shall be mixed according to the
   connection "mode", as specified later in this document.  The precise
   number of connections that an endpoint support is a characteristic of
   the gateway, and may in fact vary according with the allocation of
   resource within the gateway.  A typical gateway should however be
   able to support two or three connections per endpoint, in order to
   provide services such as "call waiting" or "three ways calling".

2.1.1.3. Annoucement server access point
An announcement server endpoint provides acces to an announcement service. Under requests from the call agent, the announcement server will "play" a specified announcement. The requests from the call agent will follow the event signalling and reporting procedures defined in MGCP. +----------------------+ | Announcement endpoint| -------- Connection +----------------------+ A given announcement endpoint is not supposed to support more than one connection at a time. If several connections were established to the same endpoint, then the same announcements would be played simultaneously over all the connections. Connections to an announcement server are typically oneway, or "half duplex" -- the announcement server is not expected to listen the audio signals from the connection.
2.1.1.4. Interactive Voice Response access point
An Interactive Voice Response (IVR) endpoint provides acces to an IVR service. Under requests from the call agent, the IVR server will "play" announcements and tones, and will "listen" to responses from the user. The requests from the call agent will follow the event signalling and reporting procedures defined in MGCP.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 13
                      +-------------+
                      | IVR endpoint| -------- Connection
                      +-------------+

   A given IVR endpoint is not supposed to support more than one
   connection at a time. If several connections were established to the
   same endpoint, then the same tones and announcements would be played
   simultaneously over all the connections.

2.1.1.5. Conference bridge access point
A conference bridge endpoint is used to provide access to a specific conference. +------- +--------------------------+| |Conference bridge endpoint| -------- Connections +--------------------------+| +------- Media gateways should be able to establish several connections between the endpoint and the packet networks, or between the endpoint and other endpoints in the same gateway. The signals originating from these connections shall be mixed according to the connection "mode", as specified later in this document. The precise number of connections that an endpoint support is a characteristic of the gateway, and may in fact vary according with the allocation of resource within the gateway.
2.1.1.6. Packet relay
A packet relay endpoint is a specific form of conference bridge, that typically only supports two connections. Packets relays can be found in firewalls between a protected and an open network, or in transcoding servers used to provide interoperation between incompatible gateways, for example gateways that do not support compatible compression algorithms, or gateways that operate over different transmission networks such as IP and ATM. +------- +---------------------+ | |Packet relay endpoint| 2 connections +---------------------+ | +-------
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 14
2.1.1.7. Wiretap access point
A wiretap access point provides access to a wiretap service, providing either a recording or a life playback of a connection. +-----------------+ | Wiretap endpoint| -------- Connection +-----------------+ A given wiretap endpoint is not supposed to support more than one connection at a time. If several connections were established to the same endpoint, then the recording or playback would mix the audio signals received on this connections. Connections to an wiretap endpoint are typically oneway, or "half duplex" -- the wiretap server is not expected to signal its presence in a call.
2.1.1.8. ATM "trunk side" interface.
ATM "trunk side" endpoints are typically found when one or several ATM permanent virtual circuits are used as a replacement for the classic "TDM" trunks linking switches. When ATM/AAL2 is used, several trunks or channels are multiplexed on a single virtual circuit; each of these trunks correspond to a single endpoint. +------- +------------------+| (channel) = |ATM trunk endpoint| -------- Connections +------------------+| +------- Media gateways should be able to establish several connections between the endpoint and the packet networks, or between the endpoint and other endpoints in the same gateway. The signals originating from these connections shall be mixed according to the connection "mode", as specified later in this document. The precise number of connections that an endpoint support is a characteristic of the gateway, and may in fact vary according with the allocation of resource within the gateway.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 15

2.1.2. Endpoint identifiers

Endpoints identifiers have two components that both are case insensitive: * the domain name of the gateway that is managing the endpoint, * a local name within that gateway, The syntax of the local name depends on the type of endpoint being named. However, the local name for each of these types is naturally hierarchical, beginning with a term which identifies the physical gateway containing the given endpoint and ending in a term which specifies the individual endpoint concerned. With this in mind, the following rules for construction and interpretation of the Entity Name field for these entity types MUST be supported: 1) The individual terms of the naming path MUST be separated by a single slash ("/", ASCII 2F hex). 2) The individual terms are character strings composed of letters, digits or other printable characters, with the exception of characters used as delimitors ("/", "@"), characters used for wildcarding ("*", "$") and white spaces. 3) Wild-carding is represented either by an asterisk ("*") or a dollar sign ("$") for the terms of the naming path which are to be wild-carded. Thus, if the full naming path looks like term1/term2/term3 then the Entity Name field looks like this depending on which terms are wild-carded: */term2/term3 if term1 is wild-carded term1/*/term3 if term2 is wild-carded term1/term2/* if term3 is wild-carded term1/*/* if term2 and term3 are wild-carded, etc. In each of these examples a dollar sign could have appeared instead of an asterisk.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 16
   4) A term represented by an asterisk is to be interpreted as: "use
      ALL values of this term known within the scope of the Media
      Gateway".  A term represented by a dollar sign is to be
      interpreted as: "use ANY ONE value of this term known within the
      scope of the Media Gateway".  The description of a specific
      command may add further criteria for selection within the general
      rules given here.

   If the Media Gateway controls multiple physical gateways, the first
   term of the naming MUST identify the physical gateway containing the
   desired entity.  If the Media Gateway controls only a single physical
   gateway, the first term of the naming string MAY identify that
   physical gateway, depending on local practice.  A local name that is
   composed of only a wildcard character refers to either all (*) or any
   ($) endpoints within the media gateway.

   In the case of trunking gateways, endpoints are trunk circuits
   linking a gateway to a telephone switch. These circuits are typically
   grouped into a digital multiplex, that is connected to the gateway by
   a physical interface. Such circuits are named in three contexts:

   *  In the ISUP protocol, trunks are grouped into trunk groups,
      identified by the SS7 point codes of the switches that the group
      connects. Circuits within a trunk group are identified by a
      circuit number (CIC in ISUP).

   *  In the gateway configuration files, physical interfaces are
      typically identified by the name of the interface, an arbitrary
      text string. When the interface multiplexes several circuits,
      individual circuits are typically identified by a circuit number.

   *  In MGCP, the endpoints are identified by an endpoint identifier.

   The Call Agents use configuration databases to map ranges of circuit
   numbers within an ISUP trunk group to corresponding ranges of
   circuits in a multiplex connected to a gateway through a physical
   interface. The gateway will be identified, in MGCP, by a domain name.
   The local name will be structured to encode both the name of the
   physical interface, for example X35V3+A4, and the circuit number
   within the multiplex connected to the interface, for example 13. The
   circuit number will be separated from the name of the interface by a
   fraction bar, as in:

        X35V3+A4/13
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 17
   Other types of endpoints will use different conventions. For example,
   in gateways were physical interfaces by construction only control one
   circuit, the circuit number will be omitted. The exact syntax of such
   names should be specified in the corresponding server specification.

2.1.3. Calls and connections

Connections are created on the call agent on each endpoint that will be involved in the "call." In the classic example of a connection between two "DS0" endpoints (EP1 and EP2), the call agents controlling the end points will establish two connections (C1 and C2): +---+ +---+ (channel1) ===|EP1|--(C1)--... ...(C2)--|EP2|===(channel2) +---+ +---+ Each connection will be designated locally by a connection identifier, and will be characterized by connection attributes. When the two endpoints are located on gateways that are managed by the same call agent, the creation is done via the three following steps: 1) The call agent asks the first gateway to "create a connection" on the first endpoint. The gateway allocates resources to that connection, and respond to the command by providing a "session description." The session description contains the information necessary for a third party to send packets towards the newly created connection, such as for example IP address, UDP port, and packetization parameters. 2) The call agent then asks the second gateway to "create a connection" on the second endpoint. The command carries the "session description" provided by the first gateway. The gateway allocates resources to that connection, and respond to the command by providing its own "session description." 3) The call agent uses a "modify connection" command to provide this second "session description" to the first endpoint. Once this is done, communication can proceed in both directions. When the two endpoints are located on gateways that are managed by the different call agents, these two call agents shall exchange information through a call-agent to call-agent signalling protocol, in order to synchronize the creation of the connection on the two endpoints.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 18
   Once established, the connection parameters can be modified at any
   time by a "modify connection" command.  The call agent may for
   example instruct the gateway to change the compression algorithm used
   on a connection, or to modify the IP address and UDP port to which
   data should be sent, if a connection is "redirected."

   The call agent removes a connection by sending to the gateway a
   "delete connection" command.  The gateway may also, under some
   circumstances, inform a gateway that a connection could not be
   sustained.

   The following diagram provides a view of the states of a connection,
   as seen from the gateway:
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 19
             Create connection
                received
                    |
                    V
           +-------------------+
           |resource allocation|-(failed)-+
           +-------------------+          |
                    |           (connection refused)
              (successful)
                    |
                    v
       +----------->+
       |            |
       |   +-------------------+
       |   |  remote session   |
       |   |   description     |----------(yes)--------+
       |   |    available ?    |                       |
       |   +-------------------+                       |
       |            |                                  |
       |          (no)                                 |
       |            |                                  |
       |      +-----------+                         +------+
       | +--->| half open |------> Delete   <-------| open |<----------+
       | |    |  (wait)   |      Connection         |(wait)|           |
       | |    +-----------+       received          +------+           |
       | |          |                 |              |                 |
       | |   Modify Connection        |         Modify Connection      |
       | |      received              |            received            |
       | |          |                 |                |               |
       | | +--------------------+     |       +--------------------+   |
       | | |assess modification |     |       |assess modification |   |
       | | +--------------------+     |       +--------------------+   |
       | |    |             |         |          |             |       |
       | |(failed)     (successful)   |      (failed)     (successful) |
       | |    |             |         |          |             |       |
       | +<---+             |         |          +-------------+-------+
       |                    |         |
       +<-------------------+         |
                                      |
                             +-----------------+
                             | Free connection |
                             | resources.      |
                             | Report.         |
                             +-----------------+
                                      |
                                      V
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 20
2.1.3.1. Names of calls
One of the attributes of each connection is the "call identifier." Calls are identified by unique identifiers, independent of the underlying platforms or agents. These identifiers are created by the Call Agent. They are treated in MGCP as unstructured octet strings. Call identifiers are expected to be unique within the system, or at a minimum, unique within the collection of Call Agents that control the same gateways. When a Call Agent builds several connections that pertain to the same call, either on the same gateway or in different gateways, these connections that belong to the same call share the same call-id. This identifier can then be used by accounting or management procedures, which are outside the scope of MGCP.
2.1.3.2. Names of connections
Connection identifiers are created by the gateway when it is requested to create a connection. They identify the connection within the context of an endpoint. They are treated in MGCP as unstructured octet strings. The gateway should make sure that a proper waiting period, at least 3 minutes, elapses between the end of a connection that used this identifier and its use in a new connection for the same endpoint. (Gateways may decide to use identifiers that are unique within the context of the gateway.)
2.1.3.3. Management of resources, attributes of connections
Many types of resources will be associated to a connection, such as specific signal processing functions or packetization functions. Generally, these resources fall in two categories: 1) Externally visible resources, that affect the format of "the bits on the network" and must be communicated to the second endpoint involved in the connection. 2) Internal resources, that determine which signal is being sent over the connection and how the received signals are processed by the endpoint. The resources allocated to a connection, and more generally the handling of the connection, are chosen by the gateway under instructions from the call agent. The call agent will provide these instructions by sending two set of parameters to the gateway: 1) The local directives instruct the gateway on the choice of resources that should be used for a connection,
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 21
   2) When available, the "session description" provided by the other
      end of the connection.

   The local directives specify such parameters as the mode of the
   connection (e.g. send only, send-receive), preferred coding or
   packetization methods, usage of echo cancellation or silence
   suppression.  (A detailed list can be found in the specification of
   the LocalConnectionOptions parameter of the CreateConnection
   command.) For each of these parameters, the call agent can either
   specify a value, a range of value, or no value at all.  This allow
   various implementations to implement various level of control, from a
   very tight control where the call agent specifies minute details of
   the connection handling to a very loose control where the call agent
   only specifies broad guidelines, such as the maximum bandwidth, and
   let the gateway choose the detailed values.

   Based on the value of the local directives, the gateway will
   determine the resources allocated to the connection.  When this is
   possible, the gateway will choose values that are in line with the
   remote session description - but there is no absolute requirement
   that the parameters be exactly the same.

   Once the resource have been allocated, the gateway will compose a
   "session description" that describes the way it intends to receive
   packets.  Note that the session description may in some cases present
   a range of values.  For example, if the gateway is ready to accept
   one of several compression algorithm, it can provide a list of these
   accepted algorithms.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 22
                 Local Directives
                (from call agent 1)
                        |
                        V
                 +-------------+
                 | resources   |
                 | allocation  |
                 | (gateway 1) |
                 +-------------+
                   |         |
                   V         |
                 Local       |
              Parameters     V
                   |      Session
                   |    Description               Local Directives
                   |         |                   (from call agent 2)
                   |         +---> Transmission----+      |
                   |                (CA to CA)     |      |
                   |                               V      V
                   |                           +-------------+
                   |                           | resources   |
                   |                           | allocation  |
                   |                           | (gateway 2) |
                   |                           +-------------+
                   |                               |      |
                   |                               |      V
                   |                               |    Local
                   |                               |  Parameters
                   |                            Session
                   |                          Description
                   |         +---- Transmission<---+
                   |         |      (CA to CA)
                   V         V
                 +-------------+
                 | modification|
                 | (gateway 1) |
                 +-------------+
                   |
                   V
                 Local
              Parameters

      -- Information flow: local directives & session descriptions --
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 23
2.1.3.4. Special case of local connections
Large gateways include a large number of endpoints which are often of different types. In some networks, we may often have to set-up connections between endpoints that are located within the same gateway. Examples of such connections may be: * Connecting a trunk line to a wiretap device, * Connecting a call to an Interactive Voice-Response unit, * Connecting a call to a Conferencing unit, * Routing a call from on endpoint to another, something often described as a "hairpin" connection. Local connections are much simpler to establish than network connections. In most cases, the connection will be established through some local interconnecting device, such as for example a TDM bus. When two endpoints are managed by the same gateway, it is possible to specify the connection in a single command that conveys the name of the two endpoints that will be connected. The command is essentially a "Create Connection" command which includes the name of the second endpoint in lieu of the "remote session description."

2.1.4. Names of Call Agents and other entities

The media gateway control protocol has been designed to allow the implementation of redundant Call Agents, for enhanced network reliability. This means that there is no fixed binding between entities and hardware platforms or network interfaces. Reliability can be improved by the following precautions: * Entities such as endpoints or Call Agents are identified by their domain name, not their network addresses. Several addresses can be associated with a domain name. If a command or a response cannot be forwarded to one of the network addresses, implementations should retry the transmission using another address. * Entities may move to another platform. The association between a logical name (domain name) and the actual platform are kept in the domain name service. Call Agents and Gateways should keep track of the time-to-live of the record they read from the DNS. They should query the DNS to refresh the information if the time to live has expired.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 24
   In addition to the indirection provided by the use of domain names
   and the DNS, the concept of "notified entity" is central to
   reliability and fail-over in MGCP. The "notified entity" for an
   endpoint is the Call Agent currently controlling that endpoint. At
   any point in time, an endpoint has one, and only one, "notified
   entity" associated with it, and when the endpoint needs to send a
   command to the Call Agent, it MUST send the command to the current
   "notified entity" for which endpoint(s) the command pertains. Upon
   startup, the "notified entity" MUST be set to a provisioned value.
   Most commands sent by the Call Agent include the ability to
   explicitly name the "notified entity" through the use of a
   "NotifiedEntity" parameter. The "notified entity" will stay the same
   until either a new "NotifiedEntity" parameter is received or the
   endpoint reboots. If the "notified entity" for an endpoint is empty
   or has not been set explicitly, the "notified entity" will then
   default to the source address of the last connection handling command
   or notification request received for the endpoint. Auditing will thus
   not change the "notified entity."

2.1.5. Digit maps

The Call Agent can ask the gateway to collect digits dialed by the user. This facility is intended to be used with residential gateways to collect the numbers that a user dials; it may also be used with trunking gateways and access gateways alike, to collect the access codes, credit card numbers and other numbers requested by call control services. An alternative procedure is for the gateway to notify the Call Agent of the dialed digits, as soon as they are dialed. However, such a procedure generates a large number of interactions. It is preferable to accumulate the dialed numbers in a buffer, and to transmit them in a single message. The problem with this accumulation approach, however, is that it is hard for the gateway to predict how many numbers it needs to accumulate before transmission. For example, using the phone on our desk, we can dial the following numbers:
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 25
        _______________________________________________________
       |  0                     |  Local operator             |
       |  00                    |  Long distance operator     |
       |  xxxx                  |  Local extension number     |
       |  8xxxxxxx              |  Local number               |
       |  #xxxxxxx              |  Shortcut to local number at|
       |                        |  other corporate sites      |
       |  *xx                   |  Star services              |
       |  91xxxxxxxxxx          |  Long distance number       |
       |  9011 + up to 15 digits|  International number       |
       |________________________|_____________________________|

   The solution to this problem is to load the gateway with a digit map
   that correspond to the dial plan. This digit map is expressed using a
   syntax derived from the Unix system command, egrep. For example, the
   dial plan described above results in the following digit map:

      (0T| 00T|[1-7]xxx|8xxxxxxx|#xxxxxxx|*xx|91xxxxxxxxxx|9011x.T)

   The formal syntax of the digit map is described by the DigitMap rule
   in the formal syntax description of the protocol (section 3.4).  A
   Digit-Map, according to this syntax, is defined either by a "string"
   or by a list of strings. Each string in the list is an alternative
   numbering scheme, specified either as a set of digits or timers, or
   as regular expression. A gateway that detects digits, letters or
   timers will:

   1) Add the event parameter code as a token to the end of an internal
      state variable called the "current dial string"

   2) Apply the current dial string to the digit map table, attempting a
      match to each regular expression in the Digit Map in lexical order

   3) If the result is under-qualified (partially matches at least one
      entry in the digit map), do nothing further.

   If the result matches, or is over-qualified (i.e. no further digits
   could possibly produce a match), send the current digit string to the
   Call Agent. A match, in this specification, can be either a "perfect
   match," exactly matching one of the specified alternatives, or an
   impossible match, which occur when the dial string does not match any
   of the alternative. Unexpected timers, for example, can cause
   "impossible matches."  Both perfect matches and impossible matches
   trigger notification of the accumulated digits.

   Digit maps are provided to the gateway by the Call Agent, whenever
   the Call Agent instructs the gateway to listen for digits.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 26

2.1.6. Names of events

The concept of events and signals is central to MGCP. A Call Agent may ask to be notified about certain events occurring in an endpoint, e.g. off-hook events, and a call agent may request certain signals to be applied to an endpoint, e.g. dial-tone. Events and signals are grouped in packages within which they share the same namespace which we will refer to as event names in the following. Packages are groupings of the events and signals supported by a particular type of endpoint. For instance, one package may support a certain group of events and signals for analog access lines, and another package may support another group of events and signals for video lines. One or more packages may exist for a given endpoint-type. Event names are case insensitive and are composed of two logical parts, a package name and an event name. Both names are strings of letters, hyphens and digits, with the restriction that hyphens shall never be the first or last characters in a name. Package or event names are not case sensitive - values such as "hu", "Hu", "HU" or "hU" should be considered equal. Examples of package names are "D" (DTMF), "M" (MF), "T" (Trunk) or "L" (Line). Examples of event names can be "hu" (off hook or "hang- up" transition), "hf" (flash hook) or "0" (the digit zero). In textual representations, the package name, when present, is separated from the event name by a slash ("/"). The package name is in fact optional. Each endpoint-type has a default package associated with it, and if the package name is excluded from the event name, the default package name for that endpoint-type is assumed. For example, for an analog access line, the following two event names are equal: l/dl dial-tone in the line package for an analog access line. dl dial-tone in the line package (default) for an analog access line. This document defines a basic set of package names and event names. Additional package names and event names can be registered with the IANA. A package definition shall define the name of the package, and the definition of each event belonging to the package. The event definition shall include the precise name of the event (i.e., the code used in MGCP), a plain text definition of the event, and, when appropriate, the precise definition of the corresponding signals, for example the exact frequencies of audio signal such as dial tones or DTMF tones.
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 27
   In addition, implementers can gain experience by using experimental
   packages. The names of experimental packages must start with the two
   characters "x-"; the IANA shall not register package names that start
   with these characters.

   Digits, or letters, are supported in many packages, notably "DTMF"
   and "MF". Digits and letters are defined by the rules "Digit" and
   "Letter" in the definition of digit maps. This definition refers to
   the digits (0 to 9), to the asterisk or star ("*") and orthotrope,
   number or pound sign ("#"), and to the letters "A", "B", "C" and "D",
   as well as the timer indication "T". These letters can be combined in
   "digit string" that represent the keys that a user punched on a dial.
   In addition, the letter "X" can be used to represent all digits, and
   the sign "$" can be used in wildcard notations. The need to easily
   express the digit strings has a consequence on the form of event
   names:

     An event name that does not denote a digit should always contain at
     least one character that is neither a digit, nor one of the letters
     A, B, C, D, T or X. (Such names should not contain the special
     signs "*", "#", "/" or "$".)

   A Call Agent may often have to ask a gateway to detect a group of
   events. Two conventions can be used to denote such groups:

   *  The wildcard convention can be used to detect any event belonging
      to a package, or a given event in many packages, or event any
      event in any package supported by the gateway.

   *  The regular expression Range notation can be used to detect a
      range of digits.

   The star sign (*) can be used as a wildcard instead of a package
   name, and the keyword "all" can be used as a wildcard instead of an
   event name:

     A name such as "foo/all" denotes all events in package "foo"
     A name such as "*/bar" denotes the event "bar" in any package
     supported by the gateway
     The names "*" or "*/all" denote all events supported by the
     gate way.

   The call agent can ask a gateway to detect a set of digits or letters
   either by individually describing those letters, or by using the
   "range" notation defined in the syntax of digit strings. For example,
   the call agent can:
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 28
     Use the letter "x" to denote "any letter or digit."
     Use the notation "[0-9#]" to denote the digits 0 to 9 and the pound
     sign.

   In some cases, Call Agents will request the gateway to generate or
   detect events on connections rather than on the end point itself.
   For example, gateways may be asked to provide a ringback tone on a
   connection.  When an event shall be applied on a connection, the name
   of the connection is added to the name of the event, using an "at"
   sign (@) as a delimiter, as in:

     G/rt@0A3F58

   The wildcard character "*" (star) can be used to denote "all
   connections". When this convention is used, the gateway will generate
   or detect the event on all the connections that are connected to the
   endpoint. An example of this convention could be:

     R/qa@*

   The wildcard character "$" can be used to denote "the current
   connection." It should only be used by the call agent, when the event
   notification request is "encapsulated" within a command creation or
   modification command. When this convention is used, the gateway will
   generate or detect the event on the connection that is currently
   being created or modified. An example of this convention is:

     G/rt@$

   The connection id, or a wildcard replacement, can be used in
   conjunction with the "all packages" and "all events" conventions.
   For example, the notation:

     */all@*

   can be used to designate all events on all connections.

   Events and signals are described in packages. The package description
   must provide, for each events, the following informations:

   *  The description of the event and its purpose, which should mean
      the actual signal that is generated by the client (i.e., xx ms FSK
      tone) as well as the resulting user observed result (i.e., MW
      light on/off).

   *  The detailed characteristics of the event, such as for example
      frequencies and amplitude of audio signals, modulations and
      repetitions,
ToP   noToC   RFC2705 - Page 29
   *  The typical and maximum duration of the event.

   Signals are divided into different types depending on their behavior:

   *  On/off (OO) Once applied, these signals last forever until they
      are turned off.  This may happen either as the result of an event
      or a new SignalRequests (see later).

   *  Time-out (TO) Once applied, these signals last until they are
      either turned off (by an event or SignalRequests) or a signal
      specific period of time has elapsed. Depending on package
      specifications, a signal that times out may generate an "operation
      complete" event.

   *  Brief (BR) The duration of these signals is so short, that they
      stop on their own. If an event occurs the signal will not stop,
      however if a new SignalRequests is applied, the signal will stop.
      (Note: this point should be debated.  One could make a case that
      events such as strings of DTMF digits should in fact be allowed to
      complete.)

      TO signals are normally used to alert the endpoints' users, to
      signal them that they are expected to perform a specific action,
      such as hang down the phone (ringing). Transmission of these
      signals should typically be interrupted as soon as the first of
      the requested events has been produced.

      Package descriptions should describe, for all signals, their type
      (OO, TO, BR). They should also describe the maximum duration of
      the TO signals.

2.2. Usage of SDP

The Call Agent uses the MGCP to provision the gateways with the description of connection parameters such as IP addresses, UDP port and RTP profiles. These descriptions will follow the conventions delineated in the Session Description Protocol which is now an IETF proposed standard, documented in RFC 2327. SDP allows for description of multimedia conferences. This version limits SDP usage to the setting of audio circuits and data access circuits. The initial session descriptions contain the description of exactly one media, of type "audio" for audio connections, "nas" for data access.


(next page on part 2)

Next Section