Tech-
invite
3GPP
space
IETF
RFCs
SIP
index
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
4‑5x
Content for
TR 38.824
Word version: 16.0.0
1…
2…
2
References
3
Definitions, symbols and abbreviations
4
Introduction
5
Baseline performance achievable with Rel-15 NR URLLC
6
Layer 1 enhancements
7
UL inter UE Tx prioritization/multiplexing
8
Enhanced UL configured grant (grant free) transmissions
9
Conclusion and recommendation
A
Requirements and simulation assumptions
$
Change History
2
References
3
Definitions, symbols and abbreviations
3.1
Definitions
3.2
Symbols
3.3
Abbreviations
Word‑p. 7
4
Introduction
5
Baseline performance achievable with Rel-15 NR URLLC
Word‑p. 8
5.1
Performance metric
5.2
Evaluation results and findings
5.2.1
Evaluation on electrical power distribution
5.2.2
Evaluation on transport industry
Word‑p. 11
5.2.3
Evaluation on Rel-15 enabled use case
Word‑p. 13
5.2.4
Evaluation on factory automation
Word‑p. 16
6
Layer 1 enhancements
Word‑p. 19
6.1
PDCCH enhancements
6.1.1
Rel-15 NR PDCCH evaluation
6.1.2
Compact DCI
Word‑p. 22
6.1.3
Increased PDCCH monitoring capability
Word‑p. 26
6.1.4
PDCCH repetition
6.2
UCI enhancements
6.2.1
Enhanced HARQ feedback
6.2.1.1
More than one PUCCH for HARQ-ACK transmission within a slot
6.2.1.2
Enhanced reporting procedure/feedback for HARQ-ACK
6.2.2
Enhanced CSI feedback
6.3
PUSCH enhancements
Word‑p. 27
6.3.1
Option 1: Mini-slot level repetition
Word‑p. 32
6.3.2
Option 2: Multi-segment transmission
6.3.3
Option 4
Word‑p. 33
6.3.4
Option 5
Word‑p. 34
6.3.5
Option 6
Word‑p. 35
6.4
Enhancements to scheduling/HARQ/CSI processing timeline
6.4.1
Enhancements to scheduling/HARQ processing timeline
6.4.1.1
Latency analysis
Word‑p. 36
6.4.1.2
Performance gain based on link-level evaluation
Word‑p. 40
6.4.1.3
Performance gain based on system-level evaluation
6.4.1.4
Conclusion
6.4.2
Out-of-order HARQ-ACK and PUSCH scheduling
Word‑p. 41
6.4.3
Non-periodic SR enhancement
Word‑p. 42
7
UL inter UE Tx prioritization/multiplexing
Word‑p. 43
7.1
Performance evaluation
7.1.1
Link level simulation
7.1.2
System level simulation
Word‑p. 48
7.2
Potential enhancements
Word‑p. 54
7.2.1
UE UL cancelation mechanisms
Word‑p. 55
7.2.2
Enhanced UL power control
8
Enhanced UL configured grant (grant free) transmissions
8.1
Performance evaluation
8.2
Potential enhancements
Word‑p. 59
8.2.1
Multiple active configured grants
Word‑p. 60
8.2.2
Enhancing reliability and reducing latency
8.2.3
PUSCH repetitions within a slot for grant free transmission
8.2.4
Explicit HARQ-ACK for UL configured grant transmission
9
Conclusion and recommendation
9.1
Conclusion
9.2
Recommendation
Word‑p. 61
A
Requirements and simulation assumptions
Word‑p. 62
A.1
Requirements
A.1.1
Examples of use case and requirements for electrical power distribution
A.1.2
Examples of use case and requirements for factory automation
Word‑p. 63
A.1.3
Examples of use case and requirements for transport industry
Word‑p. 64
A.1.4
Examples of use case and requirements for Rel-15 enabled use case (e.g. AR/VR)
A.2
System level simulation assumptions
Word‑p. 65
A.2.1
Simulation assumption for electrical power distribution
Word‑p. 67
A.2.2
Simulation assumption for factory automation
Word‑p. 69
A.2.3
Simulation assumption for transport industry
Word‑p. 71
A.2.4
Simulation assumption for Rel-15 enabled use case
Word‑p. 72
A.2.5
Simulation assumption for evaluating multiplexing of eMBB and URLLC UEs sharing the same carrier
Word‑p. 73
A.3
Link level simulation assumptions
A.4
Cases used for calibration of the latency results in section 6.4.1.1
Word‑p. 75
$
Change History
Word‑p. 78