Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
21222324252627282931323334353637384‑5x
Top   in Index   Prev   Next

TR 26.847
Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in 5G media services

3GPP‑Page   eToC   LoFT   fToC    CONTENT
V19.0.0 (Wzip)  2025/06  84 p.
Rapporteur:
Mr. Yip, Eric
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd

essential Table of Contents for  TR 26.847  Word version:  19.0.0

each title links to the equivalent title in the CONTENT
Here   Top

List of Figures and Tables

Figure 4.1-1Anchor architecture
Figure 4.2-1Split inference intermediate data testbed architecture
Figure 4.3-1Model data testbed architecture
Table 4.4-1Confusion matrix
Figure 5.2.2-1Transmission of the ASR model
Figure 5.2.2-2Prediction of a transcript with the reconstructed ASR model
Table 5.2.4-1Number of parameters (numParam), size (sizeAnc) and word error rates (werAnc) of the anchor models
Table 5.2.8-1Datasets considered in the scenario
Figure 5.2.8-1Exemplary python script for determining sizeAnc and werAnc
Table 5.2.9-1Test cases and respective wer ranges
Figure 5.2.9-1Example for the characterization of a compression method for different test configurations T
Table 5.2.14-1Enabled NNC tools as described in [19], other parameters are set to NNCodec's default values
Figure 5.2.14-1Compressed model size and model performance achieved for different QPs
Table 5.3.4-1DNN models used for scenario 2
Figure 5.3.5-1Testbed architecture for scenario 2
Figure 5.3.6-1Testbed configuration
Figure 5.3.9.1-1ONNX extract_model function
Figure 5.3.9.2-1VGG16 layers visualisation with Netron
Figure 5.3.9.2-2Split VGG16 at node 5 "vgg0_conv2_fwd" split
Figure 5.3.9.3-1Split illustration of resnet model at node 6 with Netron
Table 5.3.9.4-1Split operations with ONNX model files
Table 5.3.9.6.1-1Example tensor size calculations
Figure 5.3.9.6.1-1Intermediate data size and number of branches per node
Table 5.3.9.6.1-2Example tensors obtained
Figure 5.3.9.6.2-1Inference experimentation with ssd_resnet with images having various dimensions
Figure 5.3.9.6.2-2Inference experimentation with retinanet with images having various dimensions
Figure 5.3.9.6.2-3Inference experimentation with retinanet with images having various dimensions (Bar graph)
Table 5.3.9.7-1Multi-branch script results for ssd_resnet
Table 5.3.9.7-2Multi-branch script results for retinanet - input image dimension 640x428
Table 5.3.9.8-1Scripts predictions for ssd_resnet and retinanet
Table 5.3.9.9-1List of 50 selected images for the experiment
Figure 5.3.9.9-1ssd_resnet map score prediction on dataset 50 selected images
Figure 5.3.9.9-2retiananet map score prediction on dataset 50 selected images
Figure 5.3.9.9-3ssd_resnet map score prediction on dataset 50 selected images with split at node 10
Figure 5.3.9.9-4retinanet map score prediction on dataset 50 selected images with split at node 1000
Figure 5.3.9.9-5ssd_resnet map score prediction on dataset 50 selected images with 7 splits
Figure 5.3.9.9-6ssd_resnet map score prediction on dataset 50 selected images with 7 splits -zoom X-axis
Figure 5.3.9.9-7retinanet map score prediction on dataset 50 selected images with 7 splits
Figure 5.3.9.9-8retinanet map score prediction on dataset 50 selected images with 7 splits - zoom X-axis
Figure 5.3.9.9-9Compression performance with ssd_resnet
Figure 5.3.9.9-10Compression performance with retinanet
Figure 5.4.3-1Feature extractor part (VGG16) of the model used in this scenario. The light green part of each cube demonstrates the convolution layer, and the dark green part of the cube shows the ReLu layer. The brown cube determines the MaxPool layer
Table 5.4.3-1Dimensions of each convolutional layer (in_channel, out_channel, kernel_height,kernel_width) of the feature extractor part of the model
Figure 5.4.4-1Architecture of the scenario
Figure 5.5.2-1Showing flow of the scenario
Figure 5.5.4-1Architecture of the model for the scenario
Figure 5.5.6-1Configuration 1: Fulling processing at MF/MRF
Figure 5.5.6-2Configuration 2: Split processing at UE1 and UE2
Figure 5.5.6-3Configuration 3: Split processing at UE1, MF/MRF, and UE2
Table 5.5.8.1-1Average number of syllables spoken per second for different languages
Table A.2-1Split point decision factors
Figure B.2.3-1The main evaluation process (simplified pseudo-code)
Table B.2.4-1Configuration parameters
Table B.2.4-2Implemented scenarios and compression methods
Table B.2.6-1Results written to the csv-file
Figure B.2.8-1Interface required to be implement for new scenarios
Figure B.2.8-2Interface required to be implemented for new compression methods

Top