Tech-
invite
3GPP
space
IETF
space
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
4‑5x
Content for
TR 25.766
Word version: 13.1.0
0…
5…
5
Target scenarios
6
Evaluation methodologies
7
Study areas
8
Impact on legacy terminals
9
Impact on specifications
10
Conclusions
A
Performance evaluation methodology
$
Change History
5
Target scenarios
Word‑p. 8
6
Evaluation methodologies
Word‑p. 9
6.1
Assumptions on receiver architectures
6.1.1
Pre-decoding IC receiver
6.1.2
Post-decoding IC receiver
Word‑p. 10
6.1.3
Type 3i receiver
6.2
Evaluations in HetNet scenario
Word‑p. 11
6.3
Evaluations in HomoNet scenario
7
Study areas
Word‑p. 13
7.1
Parameters to support UE with ICS capability
7.1.1
Signalling of the parameters to assist pre-decoding IC UE
7.1.1.1
Modulation type
7.1.1.2
Parameters with Rel-7 MIMO interferer
Word‑p. 14
7.1.2
Signaling for network assisted interference cancellation
7.2
CQI mismatch issue
Word‑p. 15
7.2.1
Performance of ICS UE without CQI mismatch
7.2.1.1
Evaluation methodology
7.2.1.1.1
Triple radio-link simulation to model the serving and interferer links
Word‑p. 16
7.2.1.1.2
Methodology for comparing performance with/without CQI mismatch
7.2.1.1.3
Methodology for evaluations on CQI mismatch for MIMO interferer
Word‑p. 18
7.2.1.2
Simulation results
7.2.1.2.1
Upper bound performance of Type 3i UE
7.2.1.2.2
Upper bound performance of pre-decoding IC UE
Word‑p. 19
7.2.1.2.3
Timing misalignment issue
Word‑p. 20
7.2.1.2.4
Simulation results of evaluations on CQI mismatch for Rel-7 MIMO interferer
Word‑p. 21
7.2.2
A solution for CQI mismatch issue
Word‑p. 22
7.2.2.1
Solution impact on system performance and UTRAN elements
Word‑p. 23
7.2.2.2
Required signaling for mitigating the CQI mismatch issue
Word‑p. 24
7.3
Offloading enhancements
7.3.1
Evaluation
7.3.1.1
Simulation modeling
7.3.1.2
HetNet scenario
Word‑p. 25
7.3.1.3
HomoNet scenario
Word‑p. 27
7.3.1.4
Observations
Word‑p. 29
7.3.1.5
Other factors to be considered
7.3.2
Solutions for offloading enhancements
7.3.2.1
Solution 1
7.3.2.1.1
Activation and deactivation of the SINR measurements
Word‑p. 30
7.3.2.1.2
Evaluation results
Word‑p. 31
7.3.2.1.3
Summary
Word‑p. 32
7.3.2.2
Solution 2
Word‑p. 33
7.3.2.3
Solution 3
Word‑p. 34
7.3.2.3.1
Enhanced offloading based on non-MF capable NodeBs
Word‑p. 35
7.3.2.3.2
Potential optimizations at the UE side
Word‑p. 36
7.3.2.4
Required signaling for offloading
7.3.2.4.1
Signaling for solution 1
7.3.2.4.2
Signaling for solution 2
7.3.2.4.3
Signaling for solution 3
7.3.3
Summary on the enhanced offloading solutions
Word‑p. 37
8
Impact on legacy terminals
8.1
Parameters to support UE with NAICS capability
8.2
Mechanisms for offloading
Word‑p. 38
8.3
Solutions to mitigate CQI mismatch issue
9
Impact on specifications
10
Conclusions
Word‑p. 39
A
Performance evaluation methodology
Word‑p. 41
A.1
Link simulation assumptions
A.2
System simulation assumptions
A.2.1
Simulation parameters
A.2.2
System performance evaluation metrics
Word‑p. 43
A.2.2.1
Full buffer traffic
A.2.2.2
Bursty traffic
Word‑p. 44
$
Change History
Word‑p. 45