Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
959493929190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 6231

An Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Control Package for the Media Control Channel Framework

Pages: 134
Proposed Standard
Errata
Updated by:  6623
Part 6 of 6 – Pages 105 to 134
First   Prev   None

Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 105   prevText

6. Examples

This section provides examples of the IVR Control Package.

6.1. AS-MS Dialog Interaction Examples

The following example assume a Control Channel has been established and synced as described in the Media Control Channel Framework [RFC6230]. The XML messages are in angled brackets (with the root <mscivr> omitted); the REPORT status is in round brackets. Other aspects of the protocol are omitted for readability.

6.1.1. Starting an IVR Dialog

An IVR dialog is started successfully, and dialogexit notification <event> is sent from the MS to the AS when the dialog exits normally.
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 106
             Application Server (AS)                   Media Server (MS)
                |                                             |
                |       (1) CONTROL: <dialogstart>            |
                |  ---------------------------------------->  |
                |                                             |
                |       (2) 202                               |
                |  <---------------------------------------   |
                |                                             |
                |                                             |
                |       (3) REPORT: <response status="200"/>  |
                |                   (terminate)               |
                |  <----------------------------------------  |
                |                                             |
                |       (4) 200                               |
                |  ---------------------------------------->  |
                |                                             |
                |       (5) CONTROL: <event ... />            |
                |                                             |
                |  <----------------------------------------  |
                |                                             |
                |       (6) 200                               |
                |  ---------------------------------------->  |
                |                                             |

6.1.2. IVR Dialog Fails to Start

An IVR dialog fails to start due to an unknown dialog language. The <response> is reported in a framework 200 message. Application Server (AS) Media Server (MS) | | | (1) CONTROL: <dialogstart> | | ----------------------------------------> | | | | (2) 200: <response status="421"/> | | <---------------------------------------- | | |
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 107

6.1.3. Preparing and Starting an IVR Dialog

An IVR dialog is prepared and started successfully, and then the dialog exits normally. Application Server (AS) Media Server (MS) | | | (1) CONTROL: <dialogprepare> | | ----------------------------------------> | | | | (2) 202 | | <--------------------------------------- | | | | (3) REPORT: <response status="200"/> | | (terminate) | | <---------------------------------------- | | | | (4) 200 | | ----------------------------------------> | | | | (5) CONTROL: <dialogstart> | | ----------------------------------------> | | | | (6) 202 | | <--------------------------------------- | | | | (7) REPORT: <response status="200"/> | | (terminate) | | <---------------------------------------- | | | | (8) 200 | | ----------------------------------------> | | | | (9) CONTROL: <event .../> | | <---------------------------------------- | | | | (10) 200 | | ----------------------------------------> | | |
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 108

6.1.4. Terminating a Dialog

An IVR dialog is started successfully, and then terminated by the AS. The dialogexit event is sent to the AS when the dialog exits. Application Server (AS) Media Server (MS) | | | (1) CONTROL: <dialogstart> | | ----------------------------------------> | | | | (2) 202 | | <--------------------------------------- | | | | (3) REPORT: <response status="200"/> | | (terminate) | | <---------------------------------------- | | | | (4) 200 | | ----------------------------------------> | | | | (5) CONTROL: <dialogterminate> | | ----------------------------------------> | | | | (6) 200: <response status="200"/> | | <---------------------------------------- | | | | (7) CONTROL: <event .../> | | <---------------------------------------- | | | | (8) 200 | | ----------------------------------------> | | | Note that in (6) the <response> payload to the <dialogterminate/> request is carried on a framework 200 response since it could complete the requested operation before the transaction timeout.

6.2. IVR Dialog Examples

The following examples show how <dialog> is used with <dialogprepare>, <dialogstart>, and <event> elements to play prompts, set runtime controls, collect DTMF input, and record user input. The examples do not specify all messages between the AS and MS.
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 109

6.2.1. Playing Announcements

This example prepares an announcement composed of two prompts where the dialog repeatCount is set to 2. <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <dialogprepare> <dialog repeatCount="2"> <prompt> <media loc="http://www.example.com/media/Number_09.wav"/> <media loc="http://www.example.com/media/Number_11.wav"/> </prompt> </dialog> </dialogprepare> </mscivr> If the dialog is prepared successfully, a <response> is returned with status 200 and a dialog identifier assigned by the MS: <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <response status="200" dialogid="vxi78"/> </mscivr> The prepared dialog is then started on a conference playing the prompts twice: <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <dialogstart prepareddialogid="vxi78" conferenceid="conference11"/> </mscivr> In the case of a successful dialog, the output is provided in <event>; for example: <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <event dialogid="vxi78"> <dialogexit status="1"> <promptinfo termmode="completed" duration="24000"/> </dialogexit> </event> </mscivr>

6.2.2. Prompt and Collect

In this example, a prompt is played and then the MS waits for 30s for a two digit sequence:
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 110
   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <dialogstart connectionid="7HDY839:HJKSkyHS~HUwkuh7ns">
    <dialog>
     <prompt>
      <media loc="http://www.example.com/prompt1.wav"/>
     </prompt>
     <collect timeout="30s" maxdigits="2"/>
    </dialog>
    </dialogstart>
   </mscivr>

   If no user input is collected within 30s, then the following
   notification event would be returned:

   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <event dialogid="vxi81">
       <dialogexit status="1" >
          <promptinfo termmode="completed" duration="4000"/>
          <collectinfo termmode="noinput"/>
       </dialogexit>
    </event>
   </mscivr>

   The collect operation can be specified without a prompt.  Here the MS
   just waits for DTMF input from the user (the maxdigits attribute of
   <collect> defaults to 5):

   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <dialogstart connectionid="7HDY839:HJKSkyHS~HUwkuh7ns">
     <dialog>
      <collect/>
     </dialog>
    </dialogstart>
   </mscivr>

   If the dialog is successful, then dialogexit <event> contains the
   dtmf collected in its result parameter:

   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <event dialogid="vxi80">
       <dialogexit status="1">
          <collectinfo dtmf="12345" termmode="match"/>
       </dialogexit>
    </event>
   </mscivr>

   And finally, in this example, one of the input parameters is invalid:
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 111
   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
   <dialogstart connectionid="7HDY839:HJKSkyHS~HUwkuh7ns">
    <dialog repeatCount="two">
      <prompt>
        <media loc="http://www.example.com/prompt1.wav"/>
      </prompt>
      <collect cleardigitbuffer="true"
      timeout="4s" interdigittimeout="2s"
      termtimeout="0s" maxdigits="2"/>
    </dialog>
   </dialogstart>
   </mscivr>

   The error is reported in the response:

   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <response status="400" dialogid="vxi82"
     reason="repeatCount attribute value invalid: two"/>
   </mscivr>

6.2.3. Prompt and Record

In this example, the user is prompted, then their input is recorded for a maximum of 30 seconds. <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <dialogstart connectionid="7HDY839:HJKSkyHS~HUwkuh7ns"> <dialog> <prompt> <media loc="http://www.example.com/media/sayname.wav"/> </prompt> <record dtmfterm="false" maxtime="30s" beep="true"/> </dialog> </dialogstart> </mscivr> If successful and the recording is terminated by DTMF, the following is returned in a dialogexit <event>:
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 112
   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <event dialogid="vxi83">
     <dialogexit status="1">
      <recordinfo termmode="dtmf">
       <mediainfo type="audio/x-wav"
         loc="http://www.example.com/recording1.wav"/>
      </recordinfo>
     </dialogexit>
    </event>
   </mscivr>

6.2.4. Runtime Controls

In this example, a prompt is played with the collect operation and runtime controls activated. <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <dialogstart connectionid="7HDY839:HJKSkyHS~HUwkuh7ns"> <dialog> <prompt bargein="true"> <media loc="http://www.example.com/prompt1.wav"/> </prompt> <control ffkey="5" rwkey="6" speedupkey="3" speeddnkey="4"/> <collect maxdigits="2"/> </dialog> </dialogstart> </mscivr> Once the dialog is active, the user can press keys 3, 4, 5, and 6 to execute runtime controls on the prompt queue. The keys do not cause bargein to occur. If the user presses any other key, then the prompt is interrupted and DTMF collect begins. Note that runtime controls are not active during the collect operation. When the dialog is completed successfully, then both control and collect information is reported.
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 113
   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <event dialogid="vxi81">
       <dialogexit status="1">
          <promptinfo termmode="bargein"/>
          <controlinfo>
           <controlmatch dtmf="4" timestamp="2008-05-12T12:13:14Z"/>
           <controlmatch dtmf="3" timestamp="2008-05-12T12:13:15Z"/>
           <controlmatch dtmf="5" timestamp="2008-05-12T12:13:16Z"/>
          </controlinfo>
          <collectinfo termmode="match" dtmf="14"/>
       </dialogexit>
    </event>
   </mscivr>

6.2.5. Subscriptions and Notifications

In this example, a looped dialog is started with subscription for notifications each time the user input matches the collect grammar: <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <dialogstart connectionid="7HDY839:HJKSkyHS"> <dialog repeatCount="0"> <collect maxdigits="2"/> </dialog> <subscribe> <dtmfsub matchmode="collect"/> </subscribe> </dialogstart> </mscivr> Each time the user input the DTMF matching the grammar, the following notification event would be sent: <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <event dialogid="vxi81"> <dtmfnotify matchmode="collect" dtmf="12" timestamp="2008-05-12T12:13:14Z"/> </event> </mscivr> If no user input was provided, or the input did not match the grammar, the dialog would continue to loop until terminated (or an error occurred).

6.2.6. Dialog Repetition until DTMF Collection Complete

This example is a prompt and collect dialog to collect the PIN from the user. The repeatUntilComplete attribute in the <dialog> is set
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 114
   to true in this case so that when the grammar collection is complete,
   the MS automatically terminates the dialog repeat cycle and reports
   the results in a <dialogexit> event.

      <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
       <dialogstart connectionid="7HDY839:HJKSkyHS">
        <dialog repeatCount="3" repeatUntilComplete="true">
         <prompt bargein="true">
           <media loc="http://example.com/please_enter_your_pin.vox"/>
         </prompt>
         <collect maxdigits="4"/>
        </dialog>
       </dialogstart>
      </mscivr>

   If the user barges in on the prompt and <collect> receives DTMF input
   matching the grammar, the dialog cycle is considered complete and the
   MS returns the following:

      <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
       <event dialogid="vxi81">
         <dialogexit status="1">
           <promptinfo duration="3654" termmode="bargein"/>
           <collectinfo dtmf="1234" termmode="match"/>
         </dialogexit>
       </event>
      </mscivr>

   If no user input was provided, or the input did not match the
   grammar, the dialog would loop for a maximum of 3 times.

6.3. Other Dialog Languages

The following example requests that a VoiceXML dialog is started: <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <dialogstart dialogid="d2" connectionid="7HDY839:HJKSkyHS" type="application/voicexml+xml" src="http://www.example.com/mydialog.vxml" fetchtimeout="15s"> <params> <param name="prompt1">nfs://nas01/media1.3gp</param> <param name="prompt2">nfs://nas01/media2.3gp</param> </params> </dialogstart> </mscivr>
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 115
   If the MS does not support this dialog language, then the response
   would have the status code 421 (Section 4.5).  However, if it does
   support the VoiceXML dialog language, it would respond with a 200
   status, activate the VoiceXML dialog, and make the <params> available
   to the VoiceXML script as described in Section 9.

   When the VoiceXML dialog exits, exit namelist parameters are
   specified using <params> in the dialogexit event:

   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <event dialogid="d2">
      <dialogexit status="1">
       <params>
        <param name="username">peter</param>
        <param name="pin">1234</param>
       </params>
      </dialogexit>
     </event>
   </mscivr>

6.4. Foreign Namespace Attributes and Elements

An MS can support attributes and elements from foreign namespaces within the <mscivr> element. For example, the MS could support a <listen> element (in a foreign namespace) for speech recognition by analogy to how <collect> supports DTMF collection. In the following example, a prompt and collect request is extended with a <listen> element: <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr" xmlns:ex="http://www.example.com/mediactrl/extensions/1"> <dialogstart connectionid="7HDY839:HJKSkyHS~HUwkuh7ns"> <dialog> <prompt> <media loc="http://www.example.com/prompt1.wav"/> </prompt> <collect timeout="30s" maxdigits="4"/> <ex:listen maxtimeout="30s" > <ex:grammar src="http://example.org/pin.grxml"/> </ex:listen> </dialog> </dialogstart> </mscivr> In the <mscivr> root element, the xmlns:ex attribute declares that "ex" is associated with the foreign namespace URI "http://www.example.com/mediactrl/extensions/1". The <ex:listen>,
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 116
   its attributes, and child elements are associated with this
   namespace.  This <listen> could be defined so that it activates an
   SRGS grammar and listens for user input matching the grammar in a
   similar manner to DTMF collection.

   If an MS receives this request but does not support the <listen>
   element, then it would send a 431 response:

   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <response status="431" dialogid="d560"
     reason="unsupported foreign listen element"/>
   </mscivr>

   If the MS does support this foreign element, it would send a 200
   response and start the dialog with speech recognition.  When the
   dialog exits, it provides information about the <listen> execution
   within <dialogexit>, again using elements in a foreign namespace such
   as <listeninfo> below:

   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"
    xmlns:ex="http://www.example.com/mediactrl/extensions/1">
    <event dialogid="d560">
      <dialogexit status="1">
       <ex:listeninfo speech="1 2 3 4" termmode="match"/>
      </dialogexit>
     </event>
   </mscivr>

   Note that in reply the AS sends a Control Framework 200 response even
   though the notification event contains an element in a foreign
   namespace that it might not understand.

7. Security Considerations

As this Control Package processes XML markup, implementations MUST address the security considerations of [RFC3023]. Implementations of this Control Package MUST address security, confidentiality, and integrity of messages transported over the Control Channel as described in Section 12 of "Media Control Channel Framework" [RFC6230], including Transport Level Protection, Control Channel Policy Management, and Session Establishment. In addition, implementations MUST address security, confidentiality, and integrity of User Agent sessions with the MS, both in terms of SIP signaling and associated RTP media flow; see [RFC6230] for further details on this topic. Finally, implementations MUST address security,
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 117
   confidentiality, and integrity of sessions where, following a URI
   scheme, an MS uploads recordings or retrieves documents and resources
   (e.g., fetching a grammar document from a web server using HTTPS).

   Adequate transport protection and authentication are critical,
   especially when the implementation is deployed in open networks.  If
   the implementation fails to correctly address these issues, it risks
   exposure to malicious attacks, including (but not limited to):

   Denial of Service:  An attacker could insert a request message into
      the transport stream causing specific dialogs on the MS to be
      terminated immediately.  For example, <dialogterminate
      dialogid="XXXX" immediate="true">, where the value of "XXXX" could
      be guessed or discovered by auditing active dialogs on the MS
      using an <audit> request.  Likewise, an attacker could impersonate
      the MS and insert error responses into the transport stream so
      denying the AS access to package capabilities.

   Resource Exhaustion:  An attacker could insert into the Control
      Channel new request messages (or modify existing ones) with, for
      instance, <dialogprepare> elements with a very long fetchtimeout
      attribute and a bogus source URL.  At some point, this will
      exhaust the number of connections that the MS is able to make.

   Phishing:  An attacker with access to the Control Channel could
      modify the "loc" attribute of the <media> element in a dialog to
      point to some other audio file that had different information from
      the original.  This modified file could include a different phone
      number for people to call if they want more information or need to
      provide additional information (such as governmental, corporate,
      or financial information).

   Data Theft:  An attacker could modify a <record> element in the
      Control Channel so as to add a new recording location:

   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <dialogstart>
     <dialog>
      <record>
         <media type="audio/x-wav" loc="(Good URI)"/>
         <media type="audio/x-wav" loc="(Attacker's URI)"/>
      </record>
     </dialog>
    </dialogstart>
   </mscivr>
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 118
   The recorded data would be uploaded to two locations indicated by the
   "{Good URI}" and the "{Attacker's URI}".  This allows the attacker to
   steal the recorded audio (which could include sensitive or
   confidential information) without the originator of the request
   necessarily being aware of the theft.

   The Media Control Channel Framework permits additional security
   policy management, including resource access and Control Channel
   usage, to be specified at the Control Package level beyond that
   specified for the Media Control Channel Framework (see Section 12.3
   of [RFC6230]).

   Since creation of IVR dialogs is associated with media processing
   resources (e.g., DTMF detectors, media playback and recording, etc.)
   on the MS, the security policy for this Control Package needs to
   address how such dialogs are securely managed across more than one
   Control Channel.  Such a security policy is only useful for secure,
   confidential, and integrity-protected channels.  The identity of
   Control Channels is determined by the channel identifier, i.e., the
   value of the cfw-id attribute in the SDP and 'Dialog-ID' header in
   the channel protocol (see [RFC6230]).  Channels are the same if they
   have the same identifier; otherwise, they are different.  This
   Control Package imposes the following additional security policies:

   Responses:  The MS MUST only send a response to a dialog management
      or audit request using the same Control Channel as the one used to
      send the request.

   Notifications:  The MS MUST only send notification events for a
      dialog using the same Control Channel as it received the request
      creating the dialog.

   Auditing:  The MS MUST only provide audit information about dialogs
      that have been created on the same Control Channel as the one upon
      the <audit> request is sent.

   Rejection:  The MS SHOULD reject requests to audit or manipulate an
      existing dialog on the MS if the channel is not the same as the
      one used when the dialog was created.  The MS rejects a request by
      sending a Control Framework 403 response (see Section 7.4 and
      Section 12.3 of [RFC6230]).  For example, if a channel with
      identifier 'cfw1234' has been used to send a request to create a
      particular dialog and the MS receives on channel 'cfw98969' a
      request to audit or terminate the dialog, then the MS sends a 403
      framework response.
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 119
   There can be valid reasons why an implementation does not reject an
   audit or dialog manipulation request on a different channel from the
   one that created the dialog.  For example, a system administrator
   might require a separate channel to audit dialog resources created by
   system users and to terminate dialogs consuming excessive system
   resources.  Alternatively, a system monitor or resource broker might
   require a separate channel to audit dialogs managed by this package
   on an MS.  However, the full implications need to be understood by
   the implementation and carefully weighted before accepting these
   reasons as valid.  If the reasons are not valid in their particular
   circumstances, the MS rejects such requests.

   There can also be valid reasons for 'channel handover' including high
   availability support or where one AS needs to take over management of
   dialogs after the AS that created them has failed.  This could be
   achieved by the Control Channels using the same channel identifier,
   one after another.  For example, assume a channel is created with the
   identifier 'cfw1234' and the channel is used to create dialogs on the
   MS.  This channel (and associated SIP dialog) then terminates due to
   a failure on the AS.  As permitted by the Control Framework, the
   channel identifier 'cfw1234' could then be reused so that another
   channel is created with the same identifier 'cfw1234', allowing it to
   'take over' management of the dialogs on the MS.  Again, the
   implementation needs to understand the full implications and
   carefully weight them before accepting these reasons as valid.  If
   the reasons are not valid for their particular circumstances, the MS
   uses the appropriate SIP mechanisms to prevent session establishment
   when the same channel identifier is used in setting up another
   Control Channel (see Section 4 of [RFC6230]).

8. IANA Considerations

IANA has registered a new Media Control Channel Framework Package, a new XML namespace, a new XML schema, and a new MIME type. IANA has further created a new registry for IVR prompt variable types.

8.1. Control Package Registration

This section registers a new Media Control Channel Framework package, per the instructions in Section 13.1 of [RFC6230]. Package Name: msc-ivr/1.0 Published Specification(s): RFC 6231 Person & email address to contact for further information: IETF MEDIACTRL working group (mediactrl@ietf.org), Scott McGlashan (smcg.stds01@mcglashan.org).
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 120

8.2. URN Sub-Namespace Registration

This section registers a new XML namespace, "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr", per the guidelines in RFC 3688 [RFC3688]. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr Registrant Contact: IETF MEDIACTRL working group (mediactrl@ietf.org), Scott McGlashan (smcg.stds01@mcglashan.org). XML: BEGIN <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>Media Control Channel Framework IVR Package attributes</title> </head> <body> <h1>Namespace for Media Control Channel Framework IVR Package attributes</h1> <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr</h2> <p>See <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6231.txt"> RFC 6231</a>.</p> </body> </html> END

8.3. XML Schema Registration

This section registers an XML schema as per the guidelines in RFC 3688 [RFC3688]. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr Registrant Contact: IETF MEDIACTRL working group (mediactrl@ietf.org), Scott McGlashan (smcg.stds01@mcglashan.org). Schema: The XML for this schema can be found in Section 5 of this document.

8.4. MIME Media Type Registration for application/msc-ivr+xml

This section registers the application/msc-ivr+xml MIME type. Type name: application Subtype name: msc-ivr+xml
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 121
      Required parameters:  (none)

      Optional parameters:  charset
         Indicates the character encoding of enclosed XML.  Default is
         UTF-8.

      Encoding considerations:  Uses XML, which can employ 8-bit
         characters, depending on the character encoding used.  See RFC
         3023 [RFC3023], Section 3.2.

      Security considerations:  No known security considerations outside
         of those provided by the Media Control Channel Framework IVR
         Package.

      Interoperability considerations:  This content type provides
         constructs for the Media Control Channel Framework IVR package.

      Published specification:  RFC 6231

      Applications that use this media type:  Implementations of
         the Media Control Channel Framework IVR package.

      Additional information:
         Magic number(s):  (none)
         File extension(s):  (none)
         Macintosh file type code(s):  (none)

      Person & email address to contact for further information:
         Scott McGlashan <smcg.stds01@mcglashan.org>

      Intended usage:  LIMITED USE

      Author/Change controller:  The IETF

      Other information:  None.

8.5. IVR Prompt Variable Type Registration Information

This specification establishes an IVR Prompt Variable Type registry for Control Packages and initiates its population as follows. New entries in this registry must be published in an RFC (either as an IETF submission or RFC Editor submission), using the IANA policy [RFC5226] "RFC Required".
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 122
   Variable Type      Control Package  Reference
   -------------      ---------------  ---------
       date            msc-ivr/1.0     [RFC6231]
       time            msc-ivr/1.0     [RFC6231]
       digits          msc-ivr/1.0     [RFC6231]

   The following information MUST be provided in an RFC in order to
   register a new prompt variable type:

   Variable Type:  The value for the <variable> type attribute
      (Section 4.3.1.1.1).  The RFC MUST specify permitted values (if
      any) for the format attribute of <variable> and how the value
      attribute is rendered for different values of the format
      attribute.  The RFC MUST NOT weaken but MAY strengthen the valid
      values of <variable> attributes defined in Section 4.3.1.1.1 of
      this specification.

   Reference:  The RFC number in which the variable type is registered.

   Control Package:  The Control Package associated with the IVR
      variable type.

   Person & address to contact for further information:

9. Using VoiceXML as a Dialog Language

The IVR Control Package allows, but does not require, the MS to support other dialog languages by referencing an external dialog document. This section provides MS implementations that support the VoiceXML dialog language ([VXML20], [VXML21], [VXML30]) with additional details about using these dialogs in this package. This section is normative for an MS that supports the VoiceXML dialog language. This section covers preparing (Section 9.1), starting (Section 9.2), terminating (Section 9.3), and exiting (Section 9.4) VoiceXML dialogs as well as handling VoiceXML call transfer (Section 9.5).

9.1. Preparing a VoiceXML Dialog

A VoiceXML dialog is prepared by sending the MS a request containing a <dialogprepare> element (Section 4.2.1). The type attribute is set to "application/voicexml+xml" and the src attribute to the URI of the VoiceXML document that is to be prepared by the MS. For example:
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 123
   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <dialogprepare type="application/voicexml+xml"
                   src="http://www.example.com/mydialog.vxml"
                   fetchtimeout="15s"/>
   </mscivr>

   The VoiceXML dialog environment uses the <dialogprepare> request as
   an opportunity to fetch and validate the initial document indicated
   by the src attribute along with any resources referenced in the
   VoiceXML document marked as prefetchable.  The maxage and maxstale
   attributes, if specified, control how the initial VoiceXML document
   is fetched using HTTP (see [RFC2616]).  Note that the fetchtimeout
   attribute is not defined in VoiceXML for an initial document, but the
   MS MUST support this attribute in its VoiceXML environment.

   If a <params> child element of <dialogprepare> is specified, then the
   MS MUST map the parameter information into a VoiceXML session
   variable object as described in Section 9.2.3.

   The success or failure of the VoiceXML document preparation is
   reported in the MS response.  For example, if the VoiceXML document
   cannot be retrieved, then a 409 error response is returned.  If the
   document is syntactically invalid according to VoiceXML, then a 400
   response is returned.  If successful, the response includes a
   dialogid attribute whose value the AS can use in <dialogstart>
   element to start the prepared dialog.

9.2. Starting a VoiceXML Dialog

A VoiceXML dialog is started by sending the MS a request containing a <dialogstart> element (Section 4.2.2). If a VoiceXML dialog has already been prepared using <dialogprepare>, then the MS starts the dialog indicated by the prepareddialogid attribute. Otherwise, a new VoiceXML dialog can be started by setting the type attribute to "application/voicexml+xml" and the src attribute to the URI of the VoiceXML document. For example: <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <dialogstart connectionid="ssd3r3:sds345b" type="application/voicexml+xml" src="http://www.example.com/mydialog.vxml" fetchtimeout="15s"/> </mscivr> The maxage and maxstale attributes, if specified, control how the initial VoiceXML document is fetched using HTTP (see [RFC2616]). Note that the fetchtimeout attribute is not defined in VoiceXML for an initial document, but the MS MUST support this attribute in its
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 124
   VoiceXML environment.  Note also that support for <dtmfsub>
   subscriptions (Section 4.2.2.1.1) and their associated dialog
   notification events is not defined in VoiceXML.  If such a
   subscription is specified in a <dialogstart> request, then the MS
   sends a 439 error response (see Section 4.5).

   The success or failure of starting a VoiceXML dialog is reported in
   the MS response as described in Section 4.2.2.

   When the MS starts a VoiceXML dialog, the MS MUST map session
   information into a VoiceXML session variable object.  There are 3
   types of session information: protocol information (Section 9.2.1),
   media stream information (Section 9.2.2), and parameter information
   (Section 9.2.3).

9.2.1. Session Protocol Information

If the connectionid attribute is specified, the MS assigns protocol information from the SIP dialog associated with the connection to the following session variables in VoiceXML: session.connection.local.uri Evaluates to the SIP URI specified in the 'To:' header of the initial INVITE. session.connection.remote.uri Evaluates to the SIP URI specified in the 'From:' header of the initial INVITE. session.connection.originator Evaluates to the value of session.connection.remote (MS receives inbound connections but does not create outbound connections). session.connection.protocol.name Evaluates to "sip". Note that this is intended to reflect the use of SIP in general, and does not distinguish between whether the connection accesses the MS via SIP or SIP Secure (SIPS) procedures. session.connection.protocol.version Evaluates to "2.0". session.connection.redirect This array is populated by information contained in the 'History-Info' header [RFC4244] in the initial INVITE or is otherwise undefined. Each entry (hi-entry) in the 'History-Info' header is mapped, in the order it appeared in the 'History-Info' header, into an element of the session.connection.redirect array. Properties of each element of the array are determined as follows: uri Set to the hi-targeted-to-uri value of the History-Info entry
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 125
      pi     Set to 'true' if hi-targeted-to-uri contains a
             'Privacy=history' parameter, or if the INVITE 'Privacy'
             header includes 'history'; 'false' otherwise

      si     Set to the value of the 'si' parameter if it exists;
             undefined otherwise

      reason Set verbatim to the value of the 'Reason' parameter of hi-
             targeted-to-uri

   session.connection.aai  Evaluates to the value of a SIP header with
      the name "aai" if present; undefined otherwise.

   session.connection.protocol.sip.requesturi  This is an associative
      array where the array keys and values are formed from the URI
      parameters on the SIP Request-URI of the initial INVITE.  The
      array key is the URI parameter name.  The corresponding array
      value is obtained by evaluating the URI parameter value as a
      string.  In addition, the array's toString() function returns the
      full SIP Request-URI.

   session.connection.protocol.sip.headers  This is an associative array
      where each key in the array is the non-compact name of a SIP
      header in the initial INVITE converted to lowercase (note the case
      conversion does not apply to the header value).  If multiple
      header fields of the same field name are present, the values are
      combined into a single comma-separated value.  Implementations
      MUST at a minimum include the 'Call-ID' header and MAY include
      other headers.  For example,
      session.connection.protocol.sip.headers["call-id"] evaluates to
      the Call-ID of the SIP dialog.

   If a conferenceid attribute is specified, then the MS populates the
   following session variables in VoiceXML:

   session.conference.name  Evaluates to the value of the conferenceid
      attribute.

9.2.2. Session Media Stream Information

The media streams of the connection or conference to use for the dialog are described in Section 4.2.2, including use of <stream> elements (Section 4.2.2.2) if specified. The MS maps media stream information into the VoiceXML session variable session.connection.protocol.sip.media for a connection, and session.conference.media for a conference. In both variables, the value of the variable is an array where each array element is an object with the following properties:
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 126
   type  This required property indicates the type of the media
      associated with the stream (see Section 4.2.2.2 <stream> type
      attribute definition).

   direction  This required property indicates the directionality of the
      media relative to the endpoint of the dialog (see Section 4.2.2.2
      <stream> direction attribute definition).

   format  This property is optional.  If defined, the value of the
      property is an array.  Each array element is an object that
      specifies information about one format of the media stream.  The
      object contains at least one property called name whose value is
      the subtype name of the media format [RFC4855].  Other properties
      may be defined with string values; these correspond to required
      and, if defined, optional parameters of the format.

   As a consequence of this definition, when a connectionid is specified
   there is an array entry in session.connection.protocol.sip.media for
   each media stream used by the VoiceXML dialog.  For an example,
   consider a connection with bidirectional G.711 mu-law audio sampled
   at 8kHz where the dialog is started with

   <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr">
    <dialogstart connectionid="ssd3r3:sds345b"
                 type="application/voicexml+xml"
                 src="http://www.example.com/mydialog.vxml"
                 fetchtimeout="15s">
     <stream media="audio" direction="recvonly"/>
    </dialogstart>
   </mscivr>

   In this case, session.connection.protocol.sip.media[0].type evaluates
   to "audio", session.connection.protocol.sip.media[0].direction
   evaluates to "recvonly" (i.e., the endpoint only receives media from
   the dialog -- the endpoint does not send media to the dialog),
   session.connection.protocol.sip.media[0].format[0].name evaluates to
   "PCMU", and session.connection.protocol.sip.media[0].format[0].rate
   evaluates to "8000".

   Note that the session variable is updated if the connection or
   conference media session characteristics for the VoiceXML dialog
   change (e.g., due to a SIP re-INVITE).
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 127

9.2.3. Session Parameter Information

Parameter information is specified in the <params> child element of <dialogprepare> and <dialogstart> elements, where each parameter is specified using a <param> element. The MS maps parameter information into VoiceXML session variables as follows: session.values This is an associative array mapped to the <params> element. It is undefined if no <params> element is specified. If a <params> element is specified in both <dialogprepare> and <dialogstart> elements for the same dialog, then the array is first initialized with the <params> specified in the <dialogprepare> element and then updated with the <params> specified in the <dialogstart> element; in cases of conflict, the <dialogstart> parameter value take priority. Array keys and values are formed from <param> children of the <params> element. Each array key is the value of the name attribute of a <param> element. If the same name is used in more than one <param> element, then the array key is associated with the last <param> in document order. The corresponding value for each key is an object with two required properties: a "type" property evaluating to the value of the type attribute, and a "content" property evaluating to the content of the <param>. In addition, this object's toString() function returns the value of the "content" property as a string. For example, a VoiceXML dialog started with one parameter: <mscivr version="1.0" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:msc-ivr"> <dialogstart connectionid="ssd3r3:sds345b" type="application/voicexml+xml" src="http://www.example.com/mydialog.vxml" fetchtimeout="15s"> <params> <param name="mode">playannouncement</param> </params> </dialogstart> </mscivr> In this case, session.values would be defined with one item in the array where session.values['mode'].type evaluates to "text/plain" (the default value), session.values['mode'].content evaluates to "playannouncement", and session.values['mode'].toString() also evaluates to "playannouncement". The MS sends an error response (see Section 4.2.2) if a <param> is not supported by the MS (e.g., the parameter type is not supported).
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 128

9.3. Terminating a VoiceXML Dialog

When the MS receives a request with a <dialogterminate> element (Section 4.2.3), the MS throws a 'connection.disconnect.hangup' event into the specified VoiceXML dialog. Note that if the immediate attribute has the value true, then the MS MUST NOT return <params> information when the VoiceXML dialog exits (even if the VoiceXML dialog provides such information) -- see Section 9.4. If the connection or conference associated with the VoiceXML dialog terminates, then the MS throws a 'connection.disconnect.hangup' event into the specified VoiceXML dialog.

9.4. Exiting a VoiceXML Dialog

The MS sends a <dialogexit> notification event (Section 4.2.5.1) when the VoiceXML dialog is complete, has been terminated, or exits due to an error. The <dialogexit> status attribute specifies the status of the VoiceXML dialog when it exits and its <params> child element specifies information, if any, returned from the VoiceXML dialog. A VoiceXML dialog exits when it processes a <disconnect> element, an <exit> element, or an implicit exit according to the VoiceXML form interpretation algorithm (FIA). If the VoiceXML dialog executes a <disconnect> and then subsequently executes an <exit> with namelist information, the namelist information from the <exit> element is discarded. The MS reports namelist variables in the <params> element of the <dialogexit>. Each <param> reports on a namelist variable. The MS set the <param> name attribute to the name of the VoiceXML variable. The MS sets the <param> type attribute according to the type of the VoiceXML variable. The MS sets the <param> type to 'text/plain' when the VoiceXML variable is a simple ECMAScript value. If the VoiceXML variable is a recording, the MS sets the <param> type to the MIME media type of the recording and encodes the recorded content as CDATA in the <param> (see Section 4.2.6.1 for an example). If the VoiceXML variable is a complex ECMAScript value (e.g., object, array, etc.), the MS sets the <param> type to 'application/json' and converts the variable value to its JSON value equivalent [RFC4627]. The behavior resulting from specifying an ECMAScript object with circular references is not defined. If the expr attribute is specified on the VoiceXML <exit> element instead of the namelist attribute, the MS creates a <param> element with the reserved name '__exit'. If the value is an ECMAScript literal, the <param> type is 'text/plain' and the content is the literal value. If the value is a variable, the <param> type and
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 129
   content are set in the same way as a namelist variable; for example,
   an expr attribute referencing a variable with a simple ECMAScript
   value has the type 'text/plain' and the content is set to the
   ECMAScript value.  To allow the AS to differentiate between a
   <dialogexit> notification event resulting from a VoiceXML
   <disconnect> from one resulting from an <exit>, the MS creates a
   <param> with the reserved name '__reason', the type 'text/plain', and
   a value of "disconnect" (without brackets) to reflect the use of
   VoiceXML's <disconnect> element, and the value of "exit" (without
   brackets) to an explicit <exit> in the VoiceXML dialog.  If the
   VoiceXML session terminates for other reasons (such as encountering
   an error), this parameter MAY be omitted or take on platform-specific
   values prefixed with an underscore.

   Table 2 provides some examples of VoiceXML <exit> usage and the
   corresponding <params> element in the <dialogexit> notification
   event.  It assumes the following VoiceXML variable names and values:
   userAuthorized=true, pin=1234, and errors=0.  The <param> type
   attributes ('text/plain') are omitted for clarity.

   +------------------------+------------------------------------------+
   | <exit> Usage           | <params> Result                          |
   +------------------------+------------------------------------------+
   | <exit>                 | <params> <param                          |
   |                        | name="__reason">exit</param> </params>   |
   | <exit expr="5">        | <params> <param                          |
   |                        | name="__reason">exit</param> <param      |
   |                        | name="__exit">5</param> </params>        |
   | <exit expr="'done'">   | <params> <param                          |
   |                        | name="__reason">exit</param> <param      |
   |                        | name="__exit">'done'</param> </params>   |
   | <exit                  | <params> <param                          |
   | expr="userAuthorized"> | name="__reason">exit</param> <param      |
   |                        | name="__exit">true</param> </params>     |
   | <exit namelist="pin    | <params> <param                          |
   | errors">               | name="__reason">exit</param> <param      |
   |                        | name="pin">1234</param> <param           |
   |                        | name="errors">0</param> </params>        |
   +------------------------+------------------------------------------+

                 Table 2: VoiceXML <exit> Mapping Examples

9.5. Call Transfer

While VoiceXML is at its core a dialog language, it also provides optional call transfer capability. It is NOT RECOMMENDED to use VoiceXML's call transfer capability in networks involving application servers. Rather, the AS itself can provide call routing
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 130
   functionality by taking signaling actions based on the data returned
   to it, either through VoiceXML's own data submission mechanisms or
   through the mechanism described in Section 9.4.  If the MS encounters
   a VoiceXML dialog requesting call transfer capability, the MS SHOULD
   raise an error event in the VoiceXML dialog execution context: an
   error.unsupported.transfer.blind event if blind transfer is
   requested, error.unsupported.transfer.bridge if bridge transfer is
   requested, or error.unsupported.transfer.consultation if consultation
   transfer is requested.

10. Contributors

Asher Shiratzky provided valuable support and contributions to the early versions of this document. The authors would like to thank the IVR design team consisting of Roni Even, Lorenzo Miniero, Adnan Saleem, Diego Besprosvan, Mary Barnes, and Steve Buko, who provided valuable feedback, input, and text to this document.

11. Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Adnan Saleem, Gene Shtirmer, Dave Burke, Dan York, Steve Buko, Jean-Francois Bertrand, Henry Lum, and Lorenzo Miniero for expert reviews of this work. Ben Campbell carried out the RAI expert review on this specification and provided a great deal of invaluable input. Donald Eastlake carried out a thorough security review.

12. References

12.1. Normative References

[RFC2045] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies", RFC 2045, November 1996. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2277] Alvestrand, H., "IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages", BCP 18, RFC 2277, January 1998. [RFC2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 131
   [RFC2818]  Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818, May 2000.

   [RFC3023]  Murata, M., St. Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, "XML Media
              Types", RFC 3023, January 2001.

   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
              January 2004.

   [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
              Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
              RFC 3986, January 2005.

   [RFC4288]  Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
              Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.

   [RFC4574]  Levin, O. and G. Camarillo, "The Session Description
              Protocol (SDP) Label Attribute", RFC 4574, August 2006.

   [RFC4627]  Crockford, D., "The application/json Media Type for
              JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)", RFC 4627, July 2006.

   [RFC4647]  Phillips, A. and M. Davis, "Matching of Language Tags",
              BCP 47, RFC 4647, September 2006.

   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
              May 2008.

   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.

   [RFC5646]  Phillips, A. and M. Davis, "Tags for Identifying
              Languages", BCP 47, RFC 5646, September 2009.

   [RFC6230]  Boulton, C., Melanchuk, T., and S. McGlashan, "Media
              Control Channel Framework", RFC 6230, May 2011.

   [SRGS]     Hunt, A. and S. McGlashan, "Speech Recognition Grammar
              Specification Version 1.0", W3C Recommendation,
              March 2004.

   [VXML20]   McGlashan, S., Burnett, D., Carter, J., Danielsen, P.,
              Ferrans, J., Hunt, A., Lucas, B., Porter, B., Rehor, K.,
              and S. Tryphonas, "Voice Extensible Markup Language
              (VoiceXML) Version 2.0", W3C Recommendation, March 2004.
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 132
   [VXML21]   Oshry, M., Auburn, RJ., Baggia, P., Bodell, M., Burke, D.,
              Burnett, D., Candell, E., Carter, J., McGlashan, S., Lee,
              A., Porter, B., and K. Rehor, "Voice Extensible Markup
              Language (VoiceXML) Version 2.1", W3C Recommendation,
              June 2007.

   [W3C.REC-SMIL2-20051213]
              Jansen, J., Layaida, N., Michel, T., Grassel, G.,
              Koivisto, A., Bulterman, D., Mullender, S., and D. Zucker,
              "Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 2.1)",
              World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-SMIL2-
              20051213, December 2005,
              <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20051213>.

   [XML]      Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C M., Maler, E.,
              and F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
              (Third Edition)", W3C Recommendation, February 2004.

   [XMLSchema:Part2]
              Biron, P. and A. Malhotra, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
              Second Edition", W3C Recommendation, October 2004.

12.2. Informative References

[CCXML10] Auburn, R J., "Voice Browser Call Control: CCXML Version 1.0", W3C Candidate Recommendation (work in progress), April 2010. [H.248.9] "Gateway control protocol: Advanced media server packages", ITU-T Recommendation H.248.9. [IANA] IANA, "RTP Payload Types", available from http://www.iana.org. [MIME.mediatypes] IANA, "MIME Media Types", available from http://www.iana.org. [MIXER-CP] McGlashan, S., Melanchuk, T., and C. Boulton, "A Mixer Control Package for the Media Control Channel Framework", Work in Progress, January 2011. [RFC2897] Cromwell, D., "Proposal for an MGCP Advanced Audio Package", RFC 2897, August 2000.
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 133
   [RFC3261]  Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston,
              A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E.
              Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261,
              June 2002.

   [RFC4240]  Burger, E., Van Dyke, J., and A. Spitzer, "Basic Network
              Media Services with SIP", RFC 4240, December 2005.

   [RFC4244]  Barnes, M., "An Extension to the Session Initiation
              Protocol (SIP) for Request History Information", RFC 4244,
              November 2005.

   [RFC4267]  Froumentin, M., "The W3C Speech Interface Framework Media
              Types: application/voicexml+xml, application/ssml+xml,
              application/srgs, application/srgs+xml, application/
              ccxml+xml, and application/pls+xml", RFC 4267,
              November 2005.

   [RFC4281]  Gellens, R., Singer, D., and P. Frojdh, "The Codecs
              Parameter for "Bucket" Media Types", RFC 4281,
              November 2005.

   [RFC4730]  Burger, E. and M. Dolly, "A Session Initiation Protocol
              (SIP) Event Package for Key Press Stimulus (KPML)",
              RFC 4730, November 2006.

   [RFC4733]  Schulzrinne, H. and T. Taylor, "RTP Payload for DTMF
              Digits, Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals", RFC 4733,
              December 2006.

   [RFC4855]  Casner, S., "Media Type Registration of RTP Payload
              Formats", RFC 4855, February 2007.

   [RFC5022]  Van Dyke, J., Burger, E., and A. Spitzer, "Media Server
              Control Markup Language (MSCML) and Protocol", RFC 5022,
              September 2007.

   [RFC5167]  Dolly, M. and R. Even, "Media Server Control Protocol
              Requirements", RFC 5167, March 2008.

   [RFC5707]  Saleem, A., Xin, Y., and G. Sharratt, "Media Server Markup
              Language (MSML)", RFC 5707, February 2010.

   [VXML30]   McGlashan, S., Burnett, D., Akolkar, R., Auburn, RJ.,
              Baggia, P., Barnett, J., Bodell, M., Carter, J., Oshry,
              M., Rehor, K., Young, M., and R. Hosn, "Voice Extensible
              Markup Language (VoiceXML) Version 3.0", W3C Working
              Draft, August 2010.
Top   ToC   RFC6231 - Page 134
   [XCON-DATA-MODEL]
              Novo, O., Camarillo, G., Morgan, D., and J. Urpalainen,
              "Conference Information Data Model for Centralized
              Conferencing (XCON)", Work in Progress, April 2011.

Authors' Addresses

Scott McGlashan Hewlett-Packard EMail: smcg.stds01@mcglashan.org Tim Melanchuk Rainwillow EMail: timm@rainwillow.com Chris Boulton NS-Technologies EMail: chris@ns-technologies.com