RFC 4523
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema Definitions for X.509 Certificates
Network Working Group K. Zeilenga Request for Comments: 4523 OpenLDAP Foundation Obsoletes: 2252, 2256, 2587 June 2006 Category: Standards Track Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema Definitions for X.509 Certificates Status of This Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).Abstract
This document describes schema for representing X.509 certificates, X.521 security information, and related elements in directories accessible using the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). The LDAP definitions for these X.509 and X.521 schema elements replace those provided in RFCs 2252 and 2256.1. Introduction
This document provides LDAP [RFC4510] schema definitions [RFC4512] for a subset of elements specified in X.509 [X.509] and X.521 [X.521], including attribute types for certificates, cross certificate pairs, and certificate revocation lists; matching rules to be used with these attribute types; and related object classes. LDAP syntax definitions are also provided for associated assertion and attribute values. As the semantics of these elements are as defined in X.509 and X.521, knowledge of X.509 and X.521 is necessary to make use of the LDAP schema definitions provided herein. This document, together with [RFC4510], obsoletes RFCs 2252 and 2256 in their entirety. The changes (in this document) made since RFC 2252 and RFC 2256 include: - addition of pkiUser, pkiCA, and deltaCRL classes;
- update of attribute types to include equality matching rules in
accordance with their X.500 specifications;
- addition of certificate, certificate pair, certificate list,
and algorithm identifier matching rules; and
- addition of LDAP syntax for assertion syntaxes for these
matching rules.
This document obsoletes RFC 2587. The X.509 schema descriptions for
LDAPv2 [RFC1777] are Historic, as is LDAPv2 [RFC3494].
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119].
Schema definitions are provided using LDAP description formats
[RFC4512]. Definitions provided here are formatted (line wrapped)
for readability.
2. Syntaxes
This section describes various syntaxes used in LDAP to transfer
certificates and related data types.
2.1. Certificate
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.8 DESC 'X.509 Certificate' )
A value of this syntax is an X.509 Certificate [X.509, clause 7].
Due to changes made to the definition of a Certificate through time,
no LDAP-specific encoding is defined for this syntax. Values of this
syntax SHOULD be encoded using Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)
[X.690] and MUST only be transferred using the ;binary transfer
option [RFC4522]; that is, by requesting and returning values using
attribute descriptions such as "userCertificate;binary".
As values of this syntax contain digitally signed data, values of
this syntax and the form of each value MUST be preserved as
presented.
2.2. CertificateList
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.9 DESC 'X.509 Certificate List' )
A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateList [X.509, clause
7.3].
Due to changes made to the definition of a CertificateList through time, no LDAP-specific encoding is defined for this syntax. Values of this syntax SHOULD be encoded using DER [X.690] and MUST only be transferred using the ;binary transfer option [RFC4522]; that is, by requesting and returning values using attribute descriptions such as "certificateRevocationList;binary". As values of this syntax contain digitally signed data, values of this syntax and the form of each value MUST be preserved as presented.2.3. CertificatePair
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.10 DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair' ) A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificatePair [X.509, clause 11.2.3]. Due to changes made to the definition of an X.509 CertificatePair through time, no LDAP-specific encoding is defined for this syntax. Values of this syntax SHOULD be encoded using DER [X.690] and MUST only be transferred using the ;binary transfer option [RFC4522]; that is, by requesting and returning values using attribute descriptions such as "crossCertificatePair;binary". As values of this syntax contain digitally signed data, values of this syntax and the form of each value MUST be preserved as presented.2.4. SupportedAlgorithm
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.49 DESC 'X.509 Supported Algorithm' ) A value of this syntax is an X.509 SupportedAlgorithm [X.509, clause 11.2.7]. Due to changes made to the definition of an X.509 SupportedAlgorithm through time, no LDAP-specific encoding is defined for this syntax. Values of this syntax SHOULD be encoded using DER [X.690] and MUST only be transferred using the ;binary transfer option [RFC4522]; that is, by requesting and returning values using attribute descriptions such as "supportedAlgorithms;binary". As values of this syntax contain digitally signed data, values of this syntax and the form of the value MUST be preserved as presented.
2.5. CertificateExactAssertion
( 1.3.6.1.1.15.1 DESC 'X.509 Certificate Exact Assertion' ) A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateExactAssertion [X.509, clause 11.3.1]. Values of this syntax MUST be encoded using the Generic String Encoding Rules (GSER) [RFC3641]. Appendix A.1 provides an equivalent Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) [RFC4234] grammar for this syntax.2.6. CertificateAssertion
( 1.3.6.1.1.15.2 DESC 'X.509 Certificate Assertion' ) A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateAssertion [X.509, clause 11.3.2]. Values of this syntax MUST be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. Appendix A.2 provides an equivalent ABNF [RFC4234] grammar for this syntax.2.7. CertificatePairExactAssertion
( 1.3.6.1.1.15.3 DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair Exact Assertion' ) A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificatePairExactAssertion [X.509, clause 11.3.3]. Values of this syntax MUST be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. Appendix A.3 provides an equivalent ABNF [RFC4234] grammar for this syntax.2.8. CertificatePairAssertion
( 1.3.6.1.1.15.4 DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair Assertion' ) A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificatePairAssertion [X.509, clause 11.3.4]. Values of this syntax MUST be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. Appendix A.4 provides an equivalent ABNF [RFC4234] grammar for this syntax.2.9. CertificateListExactAssertion
( 1.3.6.1.1.15.5 DESC 'X.509 Certificate List Exact Assertion' ) A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateListExactAssertion [X.509, clause 11.3.5]. Values of this syntax MUST be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. Appendix A.5 provides an equivalent ABNF grammar for this syntax.
2.10. CertificateListAssertion
( 1.3.6.1.1.15.6 DESC 'X.509 Certificate List Assertion' ) A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateListAssertion [X.509, clause 11.3.6]. Values of this syntax MUST be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. Appendix A.6 provides an equivalent ABNF [RFC4234] grammar for this syntax.2.11. AlgorithmIdentifier
( 1.3.6.1.1.15.7 DESC 'X.509 Algorithm Identifier' ) A value of this syntax is an X.509 AlgorithmIdentifier [X.509, Clause 7]. Values of this syntax MUST be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. Appendix A.7 provides an equivalent ABNF [RFC4234] grammar for this syntax.3. Matching Rules
This section introduces a set of certificate and related matching rules for use in LDAP. These rules are intended to act in accordance with their X.500 counterparts.3.1. certificateExactMatch
The certificateExactMatch matching rule compares the presented certificate exact assertion value with an attribute value of the certificate syntax as described in clause 11.3.1 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.13.34 NAME 'certificateExactMatch' DESC 'X.509 Certificate Exact Match' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.1.15.1 )3.2. certificateMatch
The certificateMatch matching rule compares the presented certificate assertion value with an attribute value of the certificate syntax as described in clause 11.3.2 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.13.35 NAME 'certificateMatch' DESC 'X.509 Certificate Match' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.1.15.2 )
3.3. certificatePairExactMatch
The certificatePairExactMatch matching rule compares the presented certificate pair exact assertion value with an attribute value of the certificate pair syntax as described in clause 11.3.3 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.13.36 NAME 'certificatePairExactMatch' DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair Exact Match' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.1.15.3 )3.4. certificatePairMatch
The certificatePairMatch matching rule compares the presented certificate pair assertion value with an attribute value of the certificate pair syntax as described in clause 11.3.4 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.13.37 NAME 'certificatePairMatch' DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair Match' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.1.15.4 )3.5. certificateListExactMatch
The certificateListExactMatch matching rule compares the presented certificate list exact assertion value with an attribute value of the certificate pair syntax as described in clause 11.3.5 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.13.38 NAME 'certificateListExactMatch' DESC 'X.509 Certificate List Exact Match' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.1.15.5 )3.6. certificateListMatch
The certificateListMatch matching rule compares the presented certificate list assertion value with an attribute value of the certificate pair syntax as described in clause 11.3.6 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.13.39 NAME 'certificateListMatch' DESC 'X.509 Certificate List Match' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.1.15.6 )
3.7. algorithmIdentifierMatch
The algorithmIdentifierMatch mating rule compares a presented algorithm identifier with an attribute value of the supported algorithm as described in clause 11.3.7 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.13.40 NAME 'algorithmIdentifier' DESC 'X.509 Algorithm Identifier Match' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.1.15.7 )4. Attribute Types
This section details a set of certificate and related attribute types for use in LDAP.4.1. userCertificate
The userCertificate attribute holds the X.509 certificates issued to the user by one or more certificate authorities, as discussed in clause 11.2.1 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.4.36 NAME 'userCertificate' DESC 'X.509 user certificate' EQUALITY certificateExactMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.8 ) As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute are requested and transferred using the attribute description "userCertificate;binary".4.2. cACertificate
The cACertificate attribute holds the X.509 certificates issued to the certificate authority (CA), as discussed in clause 11.2.2 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.4.37 NAME 'cACertificate' DESC 'X.509 CA certificate' EQUALITY certificateExactMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.8 ) As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute are requested and transferred using the attribute description "cACertificate;binary".
4.3. crossCertificatePair
The crossCertificatePair attribute holds an X.509 certificate pair, as discussed in clause 11.2.3 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.4.40 NAME 'crossCertificatePair' DESC 'X.509 cross certificate pair' EQUALITY certificatePairExactMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.10 ) As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute are requested and transferred using the attribute description "crossCertificatePair;binary".4.4. certificateRevocationList
The certificateRevocationList attribute holds certificate lists, as discussed in 11.2.4 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.4.39 NAME 'certificateRevocationList' DESC 'X.509 certificate revocation list' EQUALITY certificateListExactMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.9 ) As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute are requested and transferred using the attribute description "certificateRevocationList;binary".4.5. authorityRevocationList
The authorityRevocationList attribute holds certificate lists, as discussed in 11.2.5 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.4.38 NAME 'authorityRevocationList' DESC 'X.509 authority revocation list' EQUALITY certificateListExactMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.9 ) As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute are requested and transferred using the attribute description "authorityRevocationList;binary".
4.6. deltaRevocationList
The deltaRevocationList attribute holds certificate lists, as discussed in 11.2.6 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.4.53 NAME 'deltaRevocationList' DESC 'X.509 delta revocation list' EQUALITY certificateListExactMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.9 ) As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute MUST be requested and transferred using the attribute description "deltaRevocationList;binary".4.7. supportedAlgorithms
The supportedAlgorithms attribute holds supported algorithms, as discussed in 11.2.7 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.4.52 NAME 'supportedAlgorithms' DESC 'X.509 supported algorithms' EQUALITY algorithmIdentifierMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.49 ) As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute MUST be requested and transferred using the attribute description "supportedAlgorithms;binary".5. Object Classes
This section details a set of certificate-related object classes for use in LDAP.5.1. pkiUser
This object class is used in augment entries for objects that may be subject to certificates, as defined in clause 11.1.1 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.6.21 NAME 'pkiUser' DESC 'X.509 PKI User' SUP top AUXILIARY MAY userCertificate )
5.2. pkiCA
This object class is used to augment entries for objects that act as certificate authorities, as defined in clause 11.1.2 of [X.509] ( 2.5.6.22 NAME 'pkiCA' DESC 'X.509 PKI Certificate Authority' SUP top AUXILIARY MAY ( cACertificate $ certificateRevocationList $ authorityRevocationList $ crossCertificatePair ) )5.3. cRLDistributionPoint
This class is used to represent objects that act as CRL distribution points, as discussed in clause 11.1.3 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.6.19 NAME 'cRLDistributionPoint' DESC 'X.509 CRL distribution point' SUP top STRUCTURAL MUST cn MAY ( certificateRevocationList $ authorityRevocationList $ deltaRevocationList ) )5.4. deltaCRL
The deltaCRL object class is used to augment entries to hold delta revocation lists, as discussed in clause 11.1.4 of [X.509]. ( 2.5.6.23 NAME 'deltaCRL' DESC 'X.509 delta CRL' SUP top AUXILIARY MAY deltaRevocationList )5.5. strongAuthenticationUser
This object class is used to augment entries for objects participating in certificate-based authentication, as defined in clause 6.15 of [X.521]. This object class is deprecated in favor of pkiUser. ( 2.5.6.15 NAME 'strongAuthenticationUser' DESC 'X.521 strong authentication user' SUP top AUXILIARY MUST userCertificate )
5.6. userSecurityInformation
This object class is used to augment entries with needed additional associated security information, as defined in clause 6.16 of [X.521]. ( 2.5.6.18 NAME 'userSecurityInformation' DESC 'X.521 user security information' SUP top AUXILIARY MAY ( supportedAlgorithms ) )5.7. certificationAuthority
This object class is used to augment entries for objects that act as certificate authorities, as defined in clause 6.17 of [X.521]. This object class is deprecated in favor of pkiCA. ( 2.5.6.16 NAME 'certificationAuthority' DESC 'X.509 certificate authority' SUP top AUXILIARY MUST ( authorityRevocationList $ certificateRevocationList $ cACertificate ) MAY crossCertificatePair )5.8. certificationAuthority-V2
This object class is used to augment entries for objects that act as certificate authorities, as defined in clause 6.18 of [X.521]. This object class is deprecated in favor of pkiCA. ( 2.5.6.16.2 NAME 'certificationAuthority-V2' DESC 'X.509 certificate authority, version 2' SUP certificationAuthority AUXILIARY MAY deltaRevocationList )6. Security Considerations
General certificate considerations [RFC3280] apply to LDAP-aware certificate applications. General LDAP security considerations [RFC4510] apply as well. While elements of certificate information are commonly signed, these signatures only protect the integrity of the signed information. In the absence of data integrity protections in LDAP (or lower layer, e.g., IPsec), a server is not assured that client certificate request (or other request) was unaltered in transit. Likewise, a client cannot be assured that the results of the query were unaltered in
transit. Hence, it is generally recommended that implementations make use of authentication and data integrity services in LDAP [RFC4513][RFC4511].7. IANA Considerations
7.1. Object Identifier Registration
The IANA has registered an LDAP Object Identifier [RFC4520] for use in this technical specification. Subject: Request for LDAP OID Registration Person & email address to contact for further information: Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org> Specification: RFC 4523 Author/Change Controller: IESG Comments: Identifies the LDAP X.509 Certificate schema elements introduced in this document.7.2. Descriptor Registration
The IANA has updated the LDAP Descriptor registry [RFC4520] as indicated below. Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration Descriptor (short name): see table Object Identifier: see table Person & email address to contact for further information: Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org> Usage: see table Specification: RFC 4523 Author/Change Controller: IESG algorithmIdentifierMatch M 2.5.13.40 authorityRevocationList A 2.5.4.38 * cACertificate A 2.5.4.37 * cRLDistributionPoint O 2.5.6.19 * certificateExactMatch M 2.5.13.34 certificateListExactMatch M 2.5.13.38 certificateListMatch M 2.5.13.39 certificateMatch M 2.5.13.35 certificatePairExactMatch M 2.5.13.36 certificatePairMatch M 2.5.13.37 certificateRevocationList A 2.5.4.39 * certificationAuthority O 2.5.6.16 * certificationAuthority-V2 O 2.5.6.16.2 * crossCertificatePair A 2.5.4.40 *
deltaCRL O 2.5.6.23 *
deltaRevocationList A 2.5.4.53 *
pkiCA O 2.5.6.22 *
pkiUser O 2.5.6.21 *
strongAuthenticationUser O 2.5.6.15 *
supportedAlgorithms A 2.5.4.52 *
userCertificate A 2.5.4.36 *
userSecurityInformation O 2.5.6.18 *
* Updates previous registration
8. Acknowledgements
This document is based on X.509, a product of the ITU-T. A number of
LDAP schema definitions were based on those found in RFCs 2252 and
2256, both products of the IETF ASID WG. The ABNF productions in
Appendix A were provided by Steven Legg. Additional material was
borrowed from prior works by David Chadwick and Steven Legg to refine
the LDAP X.509 schema.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3641] Legg, S., "Generic String Encoding Rules (GSER) for ASN.1
Types", RFC 3641, October 2003.
[RFC4510] Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
(LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map", RFC 4510, June
2006.
[RFC4512] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
(LDAP): Directory Information Models", RFC 4512, June
2006.
[RFC4522] Legg, S., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP):
The Binary Encoding Option", RFC 4522, June 2006.
[X.509] International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication
Standardization Sector, "The Directory: Authentication
Framework", X.509(2000).
[X.521] International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The Directory: Selected Object Classes", X.521(2000). [X.690] International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Specification of ASN.1 encoding rules: Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER), and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)", X.690(2002) (also ISO/IEC 8825-1:2002).9.2. Informative References
[RFC1777] Yeong, W., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol", RFC 1777, March 1995. [RFC2156] Kille, S., "MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay): Mapping between X.400 and RFC 822/MIME", RFC 2156, January 1998. [RFC3280] Housley, R., Polk, W., Ford, W., and D. Solo, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 3280, April 2002. [RFC3494] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol version 2 (LDAPv2) to Historic Status", RFC 3494, March 2003. [RFC3642] Legg, S., "Common Elements of Generic String Encoding Rules (GSER) Encodings", RFC 3642, October 2003. [RFC4234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005. [RFC4511] Sermersheim, J., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol", RFC 4511, June 2006. [RFC4513] Harrison, R. Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms", RFC 4513, June 2006. [RFC4520] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520, June 2006.
Appendix A.
This appendix is informative. This appendix provides ABNF [RFC4234] grammars for GSER-based [RFC3641] LDAP-specific encodings specified in this document. These grammars where produced using, and relying on, Common Elements for GSER Encodings [RFC3642].A.1. CertificateExactAssertion
CertificateExactAssertion = "{" sp cea-serialNumber "," sp cea-issuer sp "}" cea-serialNumber = id-serialNumber msp CertificateSerialNumber cea-issuer = id-issuer msp Name id-serialNumber = %x73.65.72.69.61.6C.4E.75.6D.62.65.72 ; 'serialNumber' id-issuer = %x69.73.73.75.65.72 ; 'issuer' Name = id-rdnSequence ":" RDNSequence id-rdnSequence = %x72.64.6E.53.65.71.75.65.6E.63.65 ; 'rdnSequence' CertificateSerialNumber = INTEGERA.2. CertificateAssertion
CertificateAssertion = "{" [ sp ca-serialNumber ] [ sep sp ca-issuer ] [ sep sp ca-subjectKeyIdentifier ] [ sep sp ca-authorityKeyIdentifier ] [ sep sp ca-certificateValid ] [ sep sp ca-privateKeyValid ] [ sep sp ca-subjectPublicKeyAlgID ] [ sep sp ca-keyUsage ] [ sep sp ca-subjectAltName ] [ sep sp ca-policy ] [ sep sp ca-pathToName ] [ sep sp ca-subject ] [ sep sp ca-nameConstraints ] sp "}" ca-serialNumber = id-serialNumber msp CertificateSerialNumber ca-issuer = id-issuer msp Name ca-subjectKeyIdentifier = id-subjectKeyIdentifier msp SubjectKeyIdentifier ca-authorityKeyIdentifier = id-authorityKeyIdentifier msp AuthorityKeyIdentifier
ca-certificateValid = id-certificateValid msp Time
ca-privateKeyValid = id-privateKeyValid msp GeneralizedTime
ca-subjectPublicKeyAlgID = id-subjectPublicKeyAlgID msp
OBJECT-IDENTIFIER
ca-keyUsage = id-keyUsage msp KeyUsage
ca-subjectAltName = id-subjectAltName msp AltNameType
ca-policy = id-policy msp CertPolicySet
ca-pathToName = id-pathToName msp Name
ca-subject = id-subject msp Name
ca-nameConstraints = id-nameConstraints msp NameConstraintsSyntax
id-subjectKeyIdentifier =
%x73.75.62.6A.65.63.74.4B.65.79.49.64.65.6E.74.69.66.69.65.72
; 'subjectKeyIdentifier'
id-authorityKeyIdentifier =
%x61.75.74.68.6F.72.69.74.79.4B.65.79.49.64.65.6E.74.69.66.69.65.72
; 'authorityKeyIdentifier'
id-certificateValid = %x63.65.72.74.69.66.69.63.61.74.65.56.61.6C.69.64
; 'certificateValid'
id-privateKeyValid = %x70.72.69.76.61.74.65.4B.65.79.56.61.6C.69.64
; 'privateKeyValid'
id-subjectPublicKeyAlgID =
%x73.75.62.6A.65.63.74.50.75.62.6C.69.63.4B.65.79.41.6C.67.49.44
; 'subjectPublicKeyAlgID'
id-keyUsage = %x6B.65.79.55.73.61.67.65 ; 'keyUsage'
id-subjectAltName = %x73.75.62.6A.65.63.74.41.6C.74.4E.61.6D.65
; 'subjectAltName'
id-policy = %x70.6F.6C.69.63.79 ; 'policy'
id-pathToName = %x70.61.74.68.54.6F.4E.61.6D.65 ; 'pathToName'
id-subject = %x73.75.62.6A.65.63.74 ; 'subject'
id-nameConstraints = %x6E.61.6D.65.43.6F.6E.73.74.72.61.69.6E.74.73
; 'nameConstraints'
SubjectKeyIdentifier = KeyIdentifier
KeyIdentifier = OCTET-STRING
AuthorityKeyIdentifier = "{" [ sp aki-keyIdentifier ]
[ sep sp aki-authorityCertIssuer ]
[ sep sp aki-authorityCertSerialNumber ] sp "}"
aki-keyIdentifier = id-keyIdentifier msp KeyIdentifier
aki-authorityCertIssuer = id-authorityCertIssuer msp GeneralNames
GeneralNames = "{" sp GeneralName *( "," sp GeneralName ) sp "}"
GeneralName = gn-otherName
/ gn-rfc822Name
/ gn-dNSName
/ gn-x400Address
/ gn-directoryName
/ gn-ediPartyName
/ gn-uniformResourceIdentifier
/ gn-iPAddress
/ gn-registeredID
gn-otherName = id-otherName ":" OtherName
gn-rfc822Name = id-rfc822Name ":" IA5String
gn-dNSName = id-dNSName ":" IA5String
gn-x400Address = id-x400Address ":" ORAddress
gn-directoryName = id-directoryName ":" Name
gn-ediPartyName = id-ediPartyName ":" EDIPartyName
gn-iPAddress = id-iPAddress ":" OCTET-STRING
gn-registeredID = gn-id-registeredID ":" OBJECT-IDENTIFIER
gn-uniformResourceIdentifier = id-uniformResourceIdentifier
":" IA5String
id-otherName = %x6F.74.68.65.72.4E.61.6D.65 ; 'otherName'
gn-id-registeredID = %x72.65.67.69.73.74.65.72.65.64.49.44
; 'registeredID'
OtherName = "{" sp on-type-id "," sp on-value sp "}"
on-type-id = id-type-id msp OBJECT-IDENTIFIER
on-value = id-value msp Value
;; <Value> as defined in Section 3 of [RFC3641]
id-type-id = %x74.79.70.65.2D.69.64 ; 'type-id'
id-value = %x76.61.6C.75.65 ; 'value'
ORAddress = dquote *SafeIA5Character dquote
SafeIA5Character = %x01-21 / %x23-7F / ; ASCII minus dquote
dquote dquote ; escaped double quote
dquote = %x22 ; '"' (double quote)
;; Note: The <ORAddress> rule encodes the x400Address component
;; of a GeneralName as a character string between double quotes.
;; The character string is first derived according to Section 4.1
;; of [RFC2156], and then any embedded double quotes are escaped
;; by being repeated. This resulting string is output between
;; double quotes.
EDIPartyName = "{" [ sp nameAssigner "," ] sp partyName sp "}"
nameAssigner = id-nameAssigner msp DirectoryString
partyName = id-partyName msp DirectoryString
id-nameAssigner = %x6E.61.6D.65.41.73.73.69.67.6E.65.72
; 'nameAssigner'
id-partyName = %x70.61.72.74.79.4E.61.6D.65 ; 'partyName'
aki-authorityCertSerialNumber = id-authorityCertSerialNumber
msp CertificateSerialNumber
id-keyIdentifier = %x6B.65.79.49.64.65.6E.74.69.66.69.65.72
; 'keyIdentifier'
id-authorityCertIssuer =
%x61.75.74.68.6F.72.69.74.79.43.65.72.74.49.73.73.75.65.72
; 'authorityCertIssuer'
id-authorityCertSerialNumber = %x61.75.74.68.6F.72.69.74.79.43
%x65.72.74.53.65.72.69.61.6C.4E.75.6D.62.65.72
; 'authorityCertSerialNumber'
Time = time-utcTime / time-generalizedTime
time-utcTime = id-utcTime ":" UTCTime
time-generalizedTime = id-generalizedTime ":" GeneralizedTime
id-utcTime = %x75.74.63.54.69.6D.65 ; 'utcTime'
id-generalizedTime = %x67.65.6E.65.72.61.6C.69.7A.65.64.54.69.6D.65
; 'generalizedTime'
KeyUsage = BIT-STRING / key-usage-bit-list
key-usage-bit-list = "{" [ sp key-usage *( "," sp key-usage ) ] sp "}"
;; Note: The <key-usage-bit-list> rule encodes the one bits in
;; a KeyUsage value as a comma separated list of identifiers.
key-usage = id-digitalSignature
/ id-nonRepudiation
/ id-keyEncipherment
/ id-dataEncipherment
/ id-keyAgreement
/ id-keyCertSign
/ id-cRLSign
/ id-encipherOnly
/ id-decipherOnly
id-digitalSignature = %x64.69.67.69.74.61.6C.53.69.67.6E.61.74
%x75.72.65 ; 'digitalSignature'
id-nonRepudiation = %x6E.6F.6E.52.65.70.75.64.69.61.74.69.6F.6E
; 'nonRepudiation'
id-keyEncipherment = %x6B.65.79.45.6E.63.69.70.68.65.72.6D.65.6E.74
; 'keyEncipherment'
id-dataEncipherment = %x64.61.74.61.45.6E.63.69.70.68.65.72.6D.65.6E
%x74 ; "dataEncipherment'
id-keyAgreement = %x6B.65.79.41.67.72.65.65.6D.65.6E.74
; 'keyAgreement'
id-keyCertSign = %x6B.65.79.43.65.72.74.53.69.67.6E
; 'keyCertSign'
id-cRLSign = %x63.52.4C.53.69.67.6E ; "cRLSign"
id-encipherOnly = %x65.6E.63.69.70.68.65.72.4F.6E.6C.79
; 'encipherOnly'
id-decipherOnly = %x64.65.63.69.70.68.65.72.4F.6E.6C.79
; 'decipherOnly'
AltNameType = ant-builtinNameForm / ant-otherNameForm
ant-builtinNameForm = id-builtinNameForm ":" BuiltinNameForm
ant-otherNameForm = id-otherNameForm ":" OBJECT-IDENTIFIER
id-builtinNameForm = %x62.75.69.6C.74.69.6E.4E.61.6D.65.46.6F.72.6D
; 'builtinNameForm'
id-otherNameForm = %x6F.74.68.65.72.4E.61.6D.65.46.6F.72.6D
; 'otherNameForm'
BuiltinNameForm = id-rfc822Name
/ id-dNSName
/ id-x400Address
/ id-directoryName
/ id-ediPartyName
/ id-uniformResourceIdentifier
/ id-iPAddress
/ id-registeredId
id-rfc822Name = %x72.66.63.38.32.32.4E.61.6D.65 ; 'rfc822Name'
id-dNSName = %x64.4E.53.4E.61.6D.65 ; 'dNSName'
id-x400Address = %x78.34.30.30.41.64.64.72.65.73.73 ; 'x400Address'
id-directoryName = %x64.69.72.65.63.74.6F.72.79.4E.61.6D.65
; 'directoryName'
id-ediPartyName = %x65.64.69.50.61.72.74.79.4E.61.6D.65
; 'ediPartyName'
id-iPAddress = %x69.50.41.64.64.72.65.73.73 ; 'iPAddress'
id-registeredId = %x72.65.67.69.73.74.65.72.65.64.49.64
; 'registeredId'
id-uniformResourceIdentifier = %x75.6E.69.66.6F.72.6D.52.65.73.6F.75
%x72.63.65.49.64.65.6E.74.69.66.69.65.72
; 'uniformResourceIdentifier'
CertPolicySet = "{" sp CertPolicyId *( "," sp CertPolicyId ) sp "}"
CertPolicyId = OBJECT-IDENTIFIER
NameConstraintsSyntax = "{" [ sp ncs-permittedSubtrees ]
[ sep sp ncs-excludedSubtrees ] sp "}"
ncs-permittedSubtrees = id-permittedSubtrees msp GeneralSubtrees
ncs-excludedSubtrees = id-excludedSubtrees msp GeneralSubtrees
id-permittedSubtrees =
%x70.65.72.6D.69.74.74.65.64.53.75.62.74.72.65.65.73
; 'permittedSubtrees'
id-excludedSubtrees =
%x65.78.63.6C.75.64.65.64.53.75.62.74.72.65.65.73
; 'excludedSubtrees'
GeneralSubtrees = "{" sp GeneralSubtree
*( "," sp GeneralSubtree ) sp "}"
GeneralSubtree = "{" sp gs-base
[ "," sp gs-minimum ]
[ "," sp gs-maximum ] sp "}"
gs-base = id-base msp GeneralName
gs-minimum = id-minimum msp BaseDistance
gs-maximum = id-maximum msp BaseDistance
id-base = %x62.61.73.65 ; 'base'
id-minimum = %x6D.69.6E.69.6D.75.6D ; 'minimum'
id-maximum = %x6D.61.78.69.6D.75.6D ; 'maximum'
BaseDistance = INTEGER-0-MAX
A.3. CertificatePairExactAssertion
CertificatePairExactAssertion = "{" [ sp cpea-issuedTo ]
[sep sp cpea-issuedBy ] sp "}"
;; At least one of <cpea-issuedTo> or <cpea-issuedBy> MUST be present.
cpea-issuedTo = id-issuedToThisCAAssertion msp
CertificateExactAssertion
cpea-issuedBy = id-issuedByThisCAAssertion msp
CertificateExactAssertion
id-issuedToThisCAAssertion = %x69.73.73.75.65.64.54.6F.54.68.69.73
%x43.41.41.73.73.65.72.74.69.6F.6E ; 'issuedToThisCAAssertion'
id-issuedByThisCAAssertion = %x69.73.73.75.65.64.42.79.54.68.69.73
%x43.41.41.73.73.65.72.74.69.6F.6E ; 'issuedByThisCAAssertion'
A.4. CertificatePairAssertion
CertificatePairAssertion = "{" [ sp cpa-issuedTo ] [sep sp cpa-issuedBy ] sp "}" ;; At least one of <cpa-issuedTo> and <cpa-issuedBy> MUST be present. cpa-issuedTo = id-issuedToThisCAAssertion msp CertificateAssertion cpa-issuedBy = id-issuedByThisCAAssertion msp CertificateAssertionA.5. CertificateListExactAssertion
CertificateListExactAssertion = "{" sp clea-issuer "," sp clea-thisUpdate [ "," sp clea-distributionPoint ] sp "}" clea-issuer = id-issuer msp Name clea-thisUpdate = id-thisUpdate msp Time clea-distributionPoint = id-distributionPoint msp DistributionPointName id-thisUpdate = %x74.68.69.73.55.70.64.61.74.65 ; 'thisUpdate' id-distributionPoint = %x64.69.73.74.72.69.62.75.74.69.6F.6E.50.6F.69.6E.74 ; 'distributionPoint' DistributionPointName = dpn-fullName / dpn-nameRelativeToCRLIssuer dpn-fullName = id-fullName ":" GeneralNames dpn-nameRelativeToCRLIssuer = id-nameRelativeToCRLIssuer ":" RelativeDistinguishedName id-fullName = %x66.75.6C.6C.4E.61.6D.65 ; 'fullName' id-nameRelativeToCRLIssuer = %x6E.61.6D.65.52.65.6C.61.74.69.76.65 %x54.6F.43.52.4C.49.73.73.75.65.72 ; 'nameRelativeToCRLIssuer'A.6. CertificateListAssertion
CertificateListAssertion = "{" [ sp cla-issuer ] [ sep sp cla-minCRLNumber ] [ sep sp cla-maxCRLNumber ] [ sep sp cla-reasonFlags ] [ sep sp cla-dateAndTime ] [ sep sp cla-distributionPoint ] [ sep sp cla-authorityKeyIdentifier ] sp "}" cla-issuer = id-issuer msp Name cla-minCRLNumber = id-minCRLNumber msp CRLNumber cla-maxCRLNumber = id-maxCRLNumber msp CRLNumber
cla-reasonFlags = id-reasonFlags msp ReasonFlags
cla-dateAndTime = id-dateAndTime msp Time
cla-distributionPoint = id-distributionPoint msp
DistributionPointName
cla-authorityKeyIdentifier = id-authorityKeyIdentifier msp
AuthorityKeyIdentifier
id-minCRLNumber = %x6D.69.6E.43.52.4C.4E.75.6D.62.65.72
; 'minCRLNumber'
id-maxCRLNumber = %x6D.61.78.43.52.4C.4E.75.6D.62.65.72
; 'maxCRLNumber'
id-reasonFlags = %x72.65.61.73.6F.6E.46.6C.61.67.73 ; 'reasonFlags'
id-dateAndTime = %x64.61.74.65.41.6E.64.54.69.6D.65 ; 'dateAndTime'
CRLNumber = INTEGER-0-MAX
ReasonFlags = BIT-STRING
/ "{" [ sp reason-flag *( "," sp reason-flag ) ] sp "}"
reason-flag = id-unused
/ id-keyCompromise
/ id-cACompromise
/ id-affiliationChanged
/ id-superseded
/ id-cessationOfOperation
/ id-certificateHold
/ id-privilegeWithdrawn
/ id-aACompromise
id-unused = %x75.6E.75.73.65.64 ; 'unused'
id-keyCompromise = %x6B.65.79.43.6F.6D.70.72.6F.6D.69.73.65
; 'keyCompromise'
id-cACompromise = %x63.41.43.6F.6D.70.72.6F.6D.69.73.65
; 'cACompromise'
id-affiliationChanged =
%x61.66.66.69.6C.69.61.74.69.6F.6E.43.68.61.6E.67.65.64
; 'affiliationChanged'
id-superseded = %x73.75.70.65.72.73.65.64.65.64 ; 'superseded'
id-cessationOfOperation =
%x63.65.73.73.61.74.69.6F.6E.4F.66.4F.70.65.72.61.74.69.6F.6E
; 'cessationOfOperation'
id-certificateHold = %x63.65.72.74.69.66.69.63.61.74.65.48.6F.6C.64
; 'certificateHold'
id-privilegeWithdrawn =
%x70.72.69.76.69.6C.65.67.65.57.69.74.68.64.72.61.77.6E
; 'privilegeWithdrawn'
id-aACompromise = %x61.41.43.6F.6D.70.72.6F.6D.69.73.65
; 'aACompromise'
A.7. AlgorithmIdentifier
AlgorithmIdentifier = "{" sp ai-algorithm
[ "," sp ai-parameters ] sp "}"
ai-algorithm = id-algorithm msp OBJECT-IDENTIFIER
ai-parameters = id-parameters msp Value
id-algorithm = %x61.6C.67.6F.72.69.74.68.6D ; 'algorithm'
id-parameters = %x70.61.72.61.6D.65.74.65.72.73 ; 'parameters'
Author's Address
Kurt D. Zeilenga
OpenLDAP Foundation
EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA).